Johnson Pang, Lora Batson, Kathryn Detwiler, Mattea E Miller, Dörte Thorndike, Renee D Boss, Miriam C Shapiro
{"title":"Where do families turn? Ethical dilemmas in the care of chronically critically Ill children.","authors":"Johnson Pang, Lora Batson, Kathryn Detwiler, Mattea E Miller, Dörte Thorndike, Renee D Boss, Miriam C Shapiro","doi":"10.1007/s40592-024-00201-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancements in early diagnosis and novel treatments for children with complex and chronic needs have improved their chances of survival. But many survive with complex medical needs and ongoing medical management in the setting of prognostic uncertainty. Their medical care relies more and more on preference-sensitive decisions, requiring medical team and family engagement in ethically challenging situations. Many families are unprepared as they face these ethical challenges and struggle to access relevant ethical resources. In this paper, Timmy's narrative, situated in the context of what is known about ethical challenges in the care of children with chronic critical illness (CCI), serves as a case study of the gap in available ethical resources to guide families in their approach to difficult decision making for children with significant medical complexity and CCI. Our author group, inclusive of parents of children with complex medical needs and medical professionals, identifies domains of ethical challenges facing families of children with CCI and we highlight the development of family/caregiver-oriented ethics resources as an essential expansion of pediatric bioethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":43628,"journal":{"name":"Monash Bioethics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash Bioethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-024-00201-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Advancements in early diagnosis and novel treatments for children with complex and chronic needs have improved their chances of survival. But many survive with complex medical needs and ongoing medical management in the setting of prognostic uncertainty. Their medical care relies more and more on preference-sensitive decisions, requiring medical team and family engagement in ethically challenging situations. Many families are unprepared as they face these ethical challenges and struggle to access relevant ethical resources. In this paper, Timmy's narrative, situated in the context of what is known about ethical challenges in the care of children with chronic critical illness (CCI), serves as a case study of the gap in available ethical resources to guide families in their approach to difficult decision making for children with significant medical complexity and CCI. Our author group, inclusive of parents of children with complex medical needs and medical professionals, identifies domains of ethical challenges facing families of children with CCI and we highlight the development of family/caregiver-oriented ethics resources as an essential expansion of pediatric bioethics.
针对有复杂和慢性需求的儿童的早期诊断和新型治疗方法的进步提高了他们的生存机会。但是,许多患儿在预后不确定的情况下,带着复杂的医疗需求和持续的医疗管理存活下来。他们的医疗护理越来越依赖于对偏好敏感的决定,这就要求医疗团队和家庭参与到具有伦理挑战性的情况中。许多家庭在面对这些伦理挑战时毫无准备,并且难以获得相关的伦理资源。在本文中,Timmy 的叙述以人们对慢性危重症(CCI)患儿护理过程中的伦理挑战的了解为背景,作为一个案例研究,说明在可用的伦理资源方面存在的差距,以指导家庭如何为患有严重医疗复杂性和慢性危重症的患儿做出艰难的决策。我们的作者群包括有复杂医疗需求儿童的家长和医疗专业人士,他们确定了 CCI 儿童家庭面临的伦理挑战领域,我们强调开发以家庭/护理人员为导向的伦理资源是儿科生命伦理学的重要扩展。
期刊介绍:
Monash Bioethics Review provides comprehensive coverage of traditional topics and emerging issues in bioethics. The Journal is especially concerned with empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance. Monash Bioethics Review also regularly publishes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications. Produced by the Monash University Centre for Human Bioethics since 1981 (originally as Bioethics News), Monash Bioethics Review is the oldest peer reviewed bioethics journal based in Australia–and one of the oldest bioethics journals in the world.
An international forum for empirically-informed philosophical bioethical analysis with policy relevance.
Includes empirical studies providing explicit ethical analysis and/or with significant ethical or policy implications.
One of the oldest bioethics journals, produced by a world-leading bioethics centre.
Publishes papers up to 13,000 words in length.
Unique New Feature: All Articles Open for Commentary