Plasma as endothelial rescue in septic shock: A randomized, phase 2a pilot trial.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1111/trf.17939
Niels E Clausen, Christian S Meyhoff, Hanne H Henriksen, Anne Lindhardt, Frank C Pott, Thomas Bech Lunen, Mikkel Gybel-Brask, Theis Lange, Pär I Johansson, Jakob Stensballe
{"title":"Plasma as endothelial rescue in septic shock: A randomized, phase 2a pilot trial.","authors":"Niels E Clausen, Christian S Meyhoff, Hanne H Henriksen, Anne Lindhardt, Frank C Pott, Thomas Bech Lunen, Mikkel Gybel-Brask, Theis Lange, Pär I Johansson, Jakob Stensballe","doi":"10.1111/trf.17939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic shock is associated with high morbidity and mortality, the endothelium plays an important role. Crystalloids is standard of care to maintain intravascular volume. Plasma is associated with improved endothelial integrity and restoration of the glycocalyx layer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety aspects of cell-free and pathogen inactivated pooled plasma (OctaplasLG®) as resuscitation in septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This randomized, investigator-initiated phase IIa trial ran at a Danish single center intensive care unit, from 2017 to 2019. Patients were 18 years of age or older with septic shock and randomized to fluid optimization with OctaplasLG® or Ringer-acetate in the first 24 h. The primary endpoints were changes in biomarkers indicative of endothelial activation, damage, and microvascular perfusion from baseline to 24 h. Safety events and mortality were assessed during 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four patients were randomized, 20 to OctaplasLG versus 24 to Ringer-acetate. The median age was 69, and 55% were men. Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 13. Baseline differences favoring the Ringer-acetate group were observed. The OctaplasLG® group was resuscitated with 740 mL plasma and the Ringer-acetate group with 841 mL crystalloids. There was no significant change in the microvascular perfusion or five biomarkers except VEGFR1 change, which was higher in patients receiving OctaplasLG® 0.12(SD 0.37) versus Ringer-acetate -0.24 (SD 0.39), with mean difference 0.36 (95% CI, 0.13-0.59, p = .003) in favor of Ringer-acetate.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study found that fluid resuscitation with OctaplasLG® in critically ill septic shock patients is feasible. Baseline confounding prevented assessment of the potential effect of OctaplasLG®.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17939","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Septic shock is associated with high morbidity and mortality, the endothelium plays an important role. Crystalloids is standard of care to maintain intravascular volume. Plasma is associated with improved endothelial integrity and restoration of the glycocalyx layer. We evaluated the efficacy and safety aspects of cell-free and pathogen inactivated pooled plasma (OctaplasLG®) as resuscitation in septic shock patients.

Study design and methods: This randomized, investigator-initiated phase IIa trial ran at a Danish single center intensive care unit, from 2017 to 2019. Patients were 18 years of age or older with septic shock and randomized to fluid optimization with OctaplasLG® or Ringer-acetate in the first 24 h. The primary endpoints were changes in biomarkers indicative of endothelial activation, damage, and microvascular perfusion from baseline to 24 h. Safety events and mortality were assessed during 90 days.

Results: Forty-four patients were randomized, 20 to OctaplasLG versus 24 to Ringer-acetate. The median age was 69, and 55% were men. Median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 13. Baseline differences favoring the Ringer-acetate group were observed. The OctaplasLG® group was resuscitated with 740 mL plasma and the Ringer-acetate group with 841 mL crystalloids. There was no significant change in the microvascular perfusion or five biomarkers except VEGFR1 change, which was higher in patients receiving OctaplasLG® 0.12(SD 0.37) versus Ringer-acetate -0.24 (SD 0.39), with mean difference 0.36 (95% CI, 0.13-0.59, p = .003) in favor of Ringer-acetate.

Discussion: This study found that fluid resuscitation with OctaplasLG® in critically ill septic shock patients is feasible. Baseline confounding prevented assessment of the potential effect of OctaplasLG®.

血浆作为脓毒性休克的内皮救援:一项随机 2a 期试点试验。
背景:脓毒性休克与高发病率和高死亡率有关,内皮细胞在其中扮演着重要角色。晶体液是维持血管内容量的标准疗法。血浆与改善内皮完整性和恢复糖萼层有关。我们评估了无细胞和病原体灭活的集合血浆(OctaplasLG®)作为脓毒性休克患者复苏药物的疗效和安全性:这项由研究者发起的随机 IIa 期试验于 2017 年至 2019 年在丹麦一家单中心重症监护病房进行。患者年龄在18岁或以上,患有脓毒性休克,在最初24小时内随机接受OctaplasLG®或醋酸林格液的液体优化治疗。主要终点是指示内皮活化、损伤和微血管灌注的生物标志物从基线到24小时的变化,90天内评估安全事件和死亡率:44名患者接受了随机治疗,其中20人接受OctaplasLG治疗,24人接受林格乙酸盐治疗。中位年龄为 69 岁,55% 为男性。序贯器官衰竭评估得分中位数为 13 分。基线差异有利于醋酸林格组。OctaplasLG® 组用 740 毫升血浆进行复苏,而林格-醋酸盐组用 841 毫升晶体液进行复苏。除血管内皮生长因子受体1(VEGFR1)的变化外,微血管灌注或五项生物标志物均无明显变化,接受OctaplasLG®的患者血管内皮生长因子受体1的变化为0.12(标清0.37),而接受醋酸林格液的患者血管内皮生长因子受体1的变化为-0.24(标清0.39),平均差为0.36(95% CI,0.13-0.59,p = .003),醋酸林格液更优:本研究发现,在脓毒性休克重症患者中使用 OctaplasLG® 进行液体复苏是可行的。基线混杂因素阻碍了对 OctaplasLG® 潜在效果的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信