Prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in western Austrian sheep flocks: Comparison of bacterial cultures, clinical foot rot and lameness with PCR and analysis of sample pooling for PCR diagnosis.

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
A Meiβl, M Duenser, C Eller, G Pelster, M Altmann, A Tichy, J L Khol
{"title":"Prevalence of Dichelobacter nodosus in western Austrian sheep flocks: Comparison of bacterial cultures, clinical foot rot and lameness with PCR and analysis of sample pooling for PCR diagnosis.","authors":"A Meiβl, M Duenser, C Eller, G Pelster, M Altmann, A Tichy, J L Khol","doi":"10.17236/sat00427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ovine foot rot is a highly contagious and multifactorial claw disease, caused by Dichelobacter nodosus (D. nodosus) and is the main cause of lameness in sheep. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of D. nodosus in western Austria both at animal and farm levels. Real-time PCR was evaluated in comparison with clinical and bacteriological investigations from interdigital foot swabs to detect D. nodosus-infected animals. In addition, the use of pooled four-foot swabs to detect foot rot was determined. In course of the study a total of 3156 sheep from 124 farms were examined for lameness and clinical signs of foot rot. The found flock prevalence of D. nodosus was 30,65 % with bacterial culture showing a sensitivity of 75,0 % and a specificity of 100,0 % (p < 0,001) respectively, compared with PCR. Furthermore, clinical foot rot scores (Ckorr = 0,87; p < 0,001) and lameness scores (Ckorr = 0,71; p < 0,001) highly correlated with the detection of D. nodosus by PCR. The result showed that the clinical examination can be used to identify animals infected with D. nodosus in flocks, but PCR must be used to confirm the diagnosis. D. nodosus could be detected equally well with risk-based pools-of-five samples as with undiluted samples (p < 0,001), suggesting that a pool-of-five samples might be a suitable and cost-effective method for detecting D. nodosus in sheep flocks. This study provides an overview of foot rot in Tyrolean sheep flocks and outlines the possibilities and limitations of the various diagnostic tools for D. nodosus. Further studies to investigate possible influencing factors, including alpine pasturing, management factors and biosecurity predisposing to foot rot are necessary for the design of effective future control programs in alpine regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21544,"journal":{"name":"Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde","volume":"166 7","pages":"368-378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17236/sat00427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ovine foot rot is a highly contagious and multifactorial claw disease, caused by Dichelobacter nodosus (D. nodosus) and is the main cause of lameness in sheep. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine the prevalence of D. nodosus in western Austria both at animal and farm levels. Real-time PCR was evaluated in comparison with clinical and bacteriological investigations from interdigital foot swabs to detect D. nodosus-infected animals. In addition, the use of pooled four-foot swabs to detect foot rot was determined. In course of the study a total of 3156 sheep from 124 farms were examined for lameness and clinical signs of foot rot. The found flock prevalence of D. nodosus was 30,65 % with bacterial culture showing a sensitivity of 75,0 % and a specificity of 100,0 % (p < 0,001) respectively, compared with PCR. Furthermore, clinical foot rot scores (Ckorr = 0,87; p < 0,001) and lameness scores (Ckorr = 0,71; p < 0,001) highly correlated with the detection of D. nodosus by PCR. The result showed that the clinical examination can be used to identify animals infected with D. nodosus in flocks, but PCR must be used to confirm the diagnosis. D. nodosus could be detected equally well with risk-based pools-of-five samples as with undiluted samples (p < 0,001), suggesting that a pool-of-five samples might be a suitable and cost-effective method for detecting D. nodosus in sheep flocks. This study provides an overview of foot rot in Tyrolean sheep flocks and outlines the possibilities and limitations of the various diagnostic tools for D. nodosus. Further studies to investigate possible influencing factors, including alpine pasturing, management factors and biosecurity predisposing to foot rot are necessary for the design of effective future control programs in alpine regions.

奥地利西部羊群中结核双球菌的流行情况:细菌培养、临床腐蹄和跛足与 PCR 的比较,以及对 PCR 诊断样本池的分析。
导言:绵羊蹄腐病是由Dichelobacter nodosus (D. nodosus)引起的一种高度传染性和多因素爪病,是导致绵羊跛足的主要原因。这项横断面研究的目的是确定 D. nodosus 在奥地利西部动物和农场的流行情况。实时 PCR 与趾间足拭子的临床和细菌学调查进行了比较评估,以检测感染 D. nodosus 的动物。此外,还确定了使用集中的四足拭子检测腐蹄病的方法。在研究过程中,共对 124 个农场的 3156 只羊进行了跛足和蹄腐病临床症状检查。发现羊群的结核杆菌感染率为 30.65%,与 PCR 相比,细菌培养的灵敏度为 75.0%,特异性为 100.0%(p < 0.001)。此外,临床烂脚评分(Ckorr = 0.87;p < 0.001)和跛足评分(Ckorr = 0.71;p < 0.001)与 PCR 检测出的结核杆菌高度相关。结果表明,临床检查可用于鉴别鸡群中感染结核杆菌的动物,但必须使用 PCR 才能确诊。使用基于风险的五份样本池和使用未稀释的样本同样可以检测到结核杆菌(p < 0,001),这表明五份样本池可能是检测羊群中结核杆菌的一种合适且经济有效的方法。本研究概述了蒂罗尔羊群中的腐蹄病,并概述了各种诊断工具检测结核病的可能性和局限性。为了在高寒地区设计有效的未来控制计划,有必要开展进一步研究,调查可能的影响因素,包括高寒牧业、管理因素和易导致蹄腐病的生物安全因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Das Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde ist die älteste veterinärmedizinische Zeitschrift der Welt (gegründet 1816). Es ist das wissenschaftliche und praxisbezogene offizielle Publikationsorgan der Gesellschaft Schweizer Tierärztinnen und Tierärzte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信