Treatment Response With Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers Based on Clinical Phenotypes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Seungyeon Seo, Hye-Kyung Jung, C Prakash Gyawali, Hye Ah Lee, Hyung Seok Lim, Eui Sun Jeong, Seong Eun Kim, Chang Mo Moon
{"title":"Treatment Response With Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers Based on Clinical Phenotypes of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Seungyeon Seo, Hye-Kyung Jung, C Prakash Gyawali, Hye Ah Lee, Hyung Seok Lim, Eui Sun Jeong, Seong Eun Kim, Chang Mo Moon","doi":"10.5056/jnm24024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is typically managed based on the clinical phenotype. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) in patients with various clinical GERD phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Core databases were searched for studies comparing PCABs and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in clinical GERD phenotypes of erosive reflux disease (ERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), PPI-resistant GERD and night-time heartburn. Additional analysis was performed based on disease severity and drug dosage, and pooled efficacy was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the initial treatment of ERD, the risk ratio for healing with PCABs versus PPIs was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.04-1.13) at 2 weeks and 1.03 (95% CI, 1.00-1.07) at 8 weeks, respectively. PCABs exhibited a significant increase in both initial and sustained healing of ERD compared to PPIs in RCTs, driven particularly in severe ERD (Los Angeles grade C/D). In 3 NERD RCTs, PCAB was superior to placebo in proportion of days without heartburn. Observational studies on PPI-resistant symptomatic GERD reported symptom frequency improvement in 86.3% of patients, while 90.7% showed improvement in PPIresistant ERD across 5 observational studies. Two RCTs for night-time heartburn had different endpoints, limiting meta-analysis. Pronounced hypergastrinemia was observed in patients treated with PCABs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to PPIs, PCABs have superior efficacy and faster therapeutic effect in the initial and maintenance therapy of ERD, particularly severe ERD. While PCABs may be an alternative treatment option in NERD and PPI-resistant GERD, findings were inconclusive in patients with night-time heartburn.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11238110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm24024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is typically managed based on the clinical phenotype. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) in patients with various clinical GERD phenotypes.

Methods: Core databases were searched for studies comparing PCABs and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in clinical GERD phenotypes of erosive reflux disease (ERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), PPI-resistant GERD and night-time heartburn. Additional analysis was performed based on disease severity and drug dosage, and pooled efficacy was calculated.

Results: In 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the initial treatment of ERD, the risk ratio for healing with PCABs versus PPIs was 1.09 (95% CI, 1.04-1.13) at 2 weeks and 1.03 (95% CI, 1.00-1.07) at 8 weeks, respectively. PCABs exhibited a significant increase in both initial and sustained healing of ERD compared to PPIs in RCTs, driven particularly in severe ERD (Los Angeles grade C/D). In 3 NERD RCTs, PCAB was superior to placebo in proportion of days without heartburn. Observational studies on PPI-resistant symptomatic GERD reported symptom frequency improvement in 86.3% of patients, while 90.7% showed improvement in PPIresistant ERD across 5 observational studies. Two RCTs for night-time heartburn had different endpoints, limiting meta-analysis. Pronounced hypergastrinemia was observed in patients treated with PCABs.

Conclusions: Compared to PPIs, PCABs have superior efficacy and faster therapeutic effect in the initial and maintenance therapy of ERD, particularly severe ERD. While PCABs may be an alternative treatment option in NERD and PPI-resistant GERD, findings were inconclusive in patients with night-time heartburn.

基于胃食管反流病临床表型的钾竞争性酸阻滞剂治疗反应:系统性文献综述与元分析》。
背景/目的:胃食管反流病(GERD)通常根据临床表型进行治疗。我们评估了钾竞争性酸阻滞剂(PCABs)对各种临床胃食管反流病表型患者的疗效和安全性:我们检索了核心数据库,比较了 PCAB 和质子泵抑制剂 (PPI) 在侵蚀性反流病 (ERD)、非侵蚀性反流病 (NERD)、耐 PPI 胃食管反流病和夜间烧心等临床胃食管反流病表型中的疗效。根据疾病严重程度和药物剂量进行了补充分析,并计算了汇总疗效:结果:在9项评估ERD初始治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)中,PCABs与PPIs相比,2周后治愈的风险比分别为1.09(95% CI,1.04-1.13),8周后治愈的风险比分别为1.03(95% CI,1.00-1.07)。与 PPIs 相比,PCABs 在 RCT 中显示出 ERD 初始愈合和持续愈合的明显增加,尤其是在重度 ERD(洛杉矶 C/D 级)中。在 3 项 NERD RCT 中,PCAB 在无烧心天数比例方面优于安慰剂。针对 PPI 耐药性症状性胃食管反流病的观察性研究报告显示,86.3% 的患者症状频率有所改善,而在 5 项观察性研究中,90.7% 的 PPI 耐药性 ERD 患者症状频率有所改善。两项针对夜间胃灼热的研究采用了不同的终点,因此限制了荟萃分析。在接受 PCABs 治疗的患者中观察到明显的高胃泌素血症:结论:与 PPIs 相比,PCABs 在 ERD(尤其是重度 ERD)的初始和维持治疗中具有更优越的疗效和更快的疗效。PCABs可能是治疗非胃炎性胃食管反流病和对PPI耐药的胃食管反流病的替代疗法,但对夜间烧心患者的研究结果尚无定论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信