Screening of genes related to programmed cell death in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and construction of prognostic model based on transcriptome analysis.
Min Chen, Yijun Qi, Shenghua Zhang, Yubo Du, Haodong Cheng, Shegan Gao
{"title":"Screening of genes related to programmed cell death in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and construction of prognostic model based on transcriptome analysis.","authors":"Min Chen, Yijun Qi, Shenghua Zhang, Yubo Du, Haodong Cheng, Shegan Gao","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2377184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To screen programmed cell death (PCD)-related genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) based on transcriptomic data and to explore its clinical value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Differentially expressed PCD genes (DEPCDGs) were screened from ESCC transcriptome and clinical data in TCGA database. Univariate COX and LASSO COX were performed on prognostically DEPCDGs in ESCC to develop prognostic model. Differences in immune cell infiltration in different RiskScore groups were determined by ssGSEA and CIBERSORT. The role of RiskScore in immunotherapy response was explored using Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) and IMvigor210 cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen DEPCDGs associated with prognosis were tapped in ESCC. These DEPCDGs form a RiskScore with good predictive performance for prognosis. RiskScore demonstrated excellent prediction accuracy in three data sets. The abundance of M2 macrophages and Tregs was higher in the high RiskScore group, and the abundance of M1 macrophages was higher in the low RiskScore group. The RiskScore also showed good immunotherapy sensitivity. RT-qPCR analysis showed that AUP1, BCAP31, DYRK2, TAF9 and UBQLN2 were higher expression in KYSE-150 cells. Knockdown BCAP31 inhibited migration and invasion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A prognostic risk model can predict prognosis of ESCC and may be a useful biomarker for risk stratification and immunotherapy assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"905-915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2377184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To screen programmed cell death (PCD)-related genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) based on transcriptomic data and to explore its clinical value.
Methods: Differentially expressed PCD genes (DEPCDGs) were screened from ESCC transcriptome and clinical data in TCGA database. Univariate COX and LASSO COX were performed on prognostically DEPCDGs in ESCC to develop prognostic model. Differences in immune cell infiltration in different RiskScore groups were determined by ssGSEA and CIBERSORT. The role of RiskScore in immunotherapy response was explored using Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) and IMvigor210 cohorts.
Results: Fourteen DEPCDGs associated with prognosis were tapped in ESCC. These DEPCDGs form a RiskScore with good predictive performance for prognosis. RiskScore demonstrated excellent prediction accuracy in three data sets. The abundance of M2 macrophages and Tregs was higher in the high RiskScore group, and the abundance of M1 macrophages was higher in the low RiskScore group. The RiskScore also showed good immunotherapy sensitivity. RT-qPCR analysis showed that AUP1, BCAP31, DYRK2, TAF9 and UBQLN2 were higher expression in KYSE-150 cells. Knockdown BCAP31 inhibited migration and invasion.
Conclusion: A prognostic risk model can predict prognosis of ESCC and may be a useful biomarker for risk stratification and immunotherapy assessment.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.