Frailty is a predictor for worse outcomes in patients hospitalized with Clostridioides difficile infection.

IF 2.1 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.20524/aog.2024.0898
Abdelkader Chaar, Jin Woo Yoo, Ahmad Nawaz, Rabia Rizwan, Osama Qasim Agha, Paul Feuerstadt
{"title":"Frailty is a predictor for worse outcomes in patients hospitalized with <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection.","authors":"Abdelkader Chaar, Jin Woo Yoo, Ahmad Nawaz, Rabia Rizwan, Osama Qasim Agha, Paul Feuerstadt","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty has major health implications for affected patients and is widely used in the perioperative risk assessment. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a validated score that utilizes administrative billing data to identify patients at higher risk because of frailty. We investigated the utility of the HFRS in patients with <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) to determine whether they were at risk for worse outcomes and higher healthcare resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2017 National Inpatient Sample, we identified all adults with a primary diagnosis of CDI. We classified patients into 2 groups: those who had an HFRS <5 (NonFrailCDI) and those with a score ≥5 (FrailCDI). We assessed differences in hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization based on frailty status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 93,810 hospitalizations, of which 54,300 (57.88%) were FrailCDI. FrailCDI patients were at higher risk for fulminant CDI (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.3), requiring colectomy (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.5-11.2), and inpatient mortality (OR 4.5, 95%CI 2.8-7.1). Furthermore, FrailCDI patients had higher odds of requiring Intensive Care Unit admission (OR 13.7, 95%CI 6.3-29.9) or transfer to another facility on discharge (OR 2.2, 95%CI 2.0-2.4), and had longer hospital stays and higher total charges when compared with NonFrailCDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty as defined by the HFRS is an independent factor for worse outcomes and higher healthcare utilization in adults admitted for CDI. Risk stratifying patients by frailty may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"442-448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2024.0898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty has major health implications for affected patients and is widely used in the perioperative risk assessment. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a validated score that utilizes administrative billing data to identify patients at higher risk because of frailty. We investigated the utility of the HFRS in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) to determine whether they were at risk for worse outcomes and higher healthcare resource utilization.

Methods: Using the 2017 National Inpatient Sample, we identified all adults with a primary diagnosis of CDI. We classified patients into 2 groups: those who had an HFRS <5 (NonFrailCDI) and those with a score ≥5 (FrailCDI). We assessed differences in hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization based on frailty status.

Results: We identified 93,810 hospitalizations, of which 54,300 (57.88%) were FrailCDI. FrailCDI patients were at higher risk for fulminant CDI (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.3), requiring colectomy (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.5-11.2), and inpatient mortality (OR 4.5, 95%CI 2.8-7.1). Furthermore, FrailCDI patients had higher odds of requiring Intensive Care Unit admission (OR 13.7, 95%CI 6.3-29.9) or transfer to another facility on discharge (OR 2.2, 95%CI 2.0-2.4), and had longer hospital stays and higher total charges when compared with NonFrailCDI.

Conclusions: Frailty as defined by the HFRS is an independent factor for worse outcomes and higher healthcare utilization in adults admitted for CDI. Risk stratifying patients by frailty may improve outcomes.

虚弱是艰难梭菌感染住院患者病情恶化的预测因素。
背景:虚弱对患者的健康有重大影响,被广泛用于围手术期风险评估。医院虚弱风险评分(Hospital Frailty Risk Score,HFRS)是一种经过验证的评分方法,它利用管理账单数据来识别因虚弱而面临较高风险的患者。我们研究了 HFRS 在艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患者中的实用性,以确定他们是否有恶化预后和提高医疗资源利用率的风险:利用 2017 年全国住院患者样本,我们确定了所有初诊为 CDI 的成年人。我们将患者分为两组:一组是有 HFRS 结果的患者,另一组是没有 HFRS 结果的患者:我们确定了 93810 例住院患者,其中 54300 例(57.88%)为 FrailCDI。FrailCDI 患者发生暴发性 CDI(几率比 [OR] 1.9,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.6-2.3)、需要结肠切除术(OR 4.1,95%CI 1.5-11.2)和住院死亡率(OR 4.5,95%CI 2.8-7.1)的风险较高。此外,与非FrailCDI相比,FrailCDI患者需要入住重症监护病房(OR 13.7,95%CI 6.3-29.9)或出院时转院(OR 2.2,95%CI 2.0-2.4)的几率更高,住院时间更长,总费用更高:结论:根据 HFRS 定义的体弱是导致因 CDI 入院的成人患者预后更差、医疗费用更高的一个独立因素。根据体弱程度对患者进行风险分层可改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterology
Annals of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信