Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Elissa M. Olimpi, Alison Ke, Patrick Baur, Liz Carlisle, Kenzo E. Esquivel, Tyler Glaser, William E. Snyder, Hannah Waterhouse, Timothy M. Bowles, Claire Kremen, Daniel S. Karp
{"title":"Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks","authors":"Elissa M. Olimpi, Alison Ke, Patrick Baur, Liz Carlisle, Kenzo E. Esquivel, Tyler Glaser, William E. Snyder, Hannah Waterhouse, Timothy M. Bowles, Claire Kremen, Daniel S. Karp","doi":"10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Context</h3><p>Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic <i>E. coli</i>, <i>Campylobacter</i> spp<i>.</i>, and <i>Salmonella</i> spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":54745,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Ecology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks.

Objectives

We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety.

Methods

We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic E. coli, Campylobacter spp., and Salmonella spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks.

Results

Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.

Abstract Image

农场周围未开垦的半自然栖息地有利于鸟类保护,但不会增加食源性病原体风险
背景工作景观的保护对于阻止生物多样性的减少和确保农业系统的可持续性至关重要。然而,由于担心野生动物可能携带食源性病原体,农民面临着移除栖息地和减少生物多样性的压力,从而破坏了农田保护。尽管如此,简化后的农田景观仍可能栖息着携带较高食源性疾病风险的鸟类群落。目标我们分析了加利福尼亚州 30 个生菜农场的当地耕作方式和周边景观对鸟类群落和食品安全风险的影响。具体而言,我们试图确定农田多样化如何影响鸟类多样性、粪便污染和食源性病原体发病率,从而确定农场管理在鸟类保护与食品安全之间的潜在权衡。方法我们在 227 个点计数点调查了鸟类,沿 120 个横断面量化了粪便污染,并对 601 个鸟类粪便进行了致病性大肠杆菌、弯曲杆菌属和沙门氏菌检测、然后,我们使用层次模型量化了农场管理和景观环境对鸟类群落和食品安全风险的影响。 结果周围未放牧的半自然区域与鸟类多样性较高、保护关注物种较多、可能增加食源性病原体风险的鸟群较少有关。相比之下,农场多样化实践和周围的放牧地对鸟类保护的益处较小。结论我们的研究结果表明,保护农产品农场周围的栖息地可以在不增加食源性病原体的情况下保护鸟类,尤其是在离牧场较远的农场。因此,使耕作制度多样化的干预措施具有同时保护生物多样性和为人类提供安全食品的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape Ecology
Landscape Ecology 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape Ecology is the flagship journal of a well-established and rapidly developing interdisciplinary science that focuses explicitly on the ecological understanding of spatial heterogeneity. Landscape Ecology draws together expertise from both biophysical and socioeconomic sciences to explore basic and applied research questions concerning the ecology, conservation, management, design/planning, and sustainability of landscapes as coupled human-environment systems. Landscape ecology studies are characterized by spatially explicit methods in which spatial attributes and arrangements of landscape elements are directly analyzed and related to ecological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信