Glitter or gold? Deriving structured insights from sustainability reports via large language models

IF 3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Marco Bronzini, Carlo Nicolini, Bruno Lepri, Andrea Passerini, Jacopo Staiano
{"title":"Glitter or gold? Deriving structured insights from sustainability reports via large language models","authors":"Marco Bronzini, Carlo Nicolini, Bruno Lepri, Andrea Passerini, Jacopo Staiano","doi":"10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00481-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the last decade, several regulatory bodies have started requiring the disclosure of non-financial information from publicly listed companies, in light of the investors’ increasing attention to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues. Publicly released information on sustainability practices is often disclosed in diverse, unstructured, and multi-modal documentation. This poses a challenge in efficiently gathering and aligning the data into a unified framework to derive insights related to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Thus, using Information Extraction (IE) methods becomes an intuitive choice for delivering insightful and actionable data to stakeholders. In this study, we employ Large Language Models (LLMs), In-Context Learning, and the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm to extract structured insights related to ESG aspects from companies’ sustainability reports. We then leverage graph-based representations to conduct statistical analyses concerning the extracted insights. These analyses revealed that ESG criteria cover a wide range of topics, exceeding 500, often beyond those considered in existing categorizations, and are addressed by companies through a variety of initiatives. Moreover, disclosure similarities emerged among companies from the same region or sector, validating ongoing hypotheses in the ESG literature. Lastly, by incorporating additional company attributes into our analyses, we investigated which factors impact the most on companies’ ESG ratings, showing that ESG disclosure affects the obtained ratings more than other financial or company data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11887,"journal":{"name":"EPJ Data Science","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPJ Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00481-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade, several regulatory bodies have started requiring the disclosure of non-financial information from publicly listed companies, in light of the investors’ increasing attention to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues. Publicly released information on sustainability practices is often disclosed in diverse, unstructured, and multi-modal documentation. This poses a challenge in efficiently gathering and aligning the data into a unified framework to derive insights related to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Thus, using Information Extraction (IE) methods becomes an intuitive choice for delivering insightful and actionable data to stakeholders. In this study, we employ Large Language Models (LLMs), In-Context Learning, and the Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) paradigm to extract structured insights related to ESG aspects from companies’ sustainability reports. We then leverage graph-based representations to conduct statistical analyses concerning the extracted insights. These analyses revealed that ESG criteria cover a wide range of topics, exceeding 500, often beyond those considered in existing categorizations, and are addressed by companies through a variety of initiatives. Moreover, disclosure similarities emerged among companies from the same region or sector, validating ongoing hypotheses in the ESG literature. Lastly, by incorporating additional company attributes into our analyses, we investigated which factors impact the most on companies’ ESG ratings, showing that ESG disclosure affects the obtained ratings more than other financial or company data.

Abstract Image

熠熠生辉还是金光闪闪?通过大型语言模型从可持续发展报告中获取结构化见解
在过去十年中,鉴于投资者对环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题的日益关注,一些监管机构开始要求上市公司披露非财务信息。公开发布的可持续发展实践信息通常是以多样化、非结构化和多模式的文件形式披露的。这给高效收集数据并将其整合到统一框架中,从而获得与企业社会责任(CSR)相关的洞察力带来了挑战。因此,使用信息提取(IE)方法成为向利益相关者提供具有洞察力和可操作性数据的直观选择。在本研究中,我们采用大型语言模型(LLM)、上下文学习(In-Context Learning)和检索-增强生成(RAG)范式,从公司的可持续发展报告中提取与 ESG 方面相关的结构化见解。然后,我们利用基于图的表示方法对提取的见解进行统计分析。这些分析表明,环境、社会和治理标准涵盖的主题范围很广,超过 500 个,往往超出了现有分类所考虑的范围,而且公司通过各种举措来解决这些问题。此外,同一地区或行业的公司在披露信息方面存在相似之处,这验证了环境、社会和公司治理文献中的假设。最后,通过将其他公司属性纳入分析,我们研究了哪些因素对公司的环境、社会和公司治理评级影响最大,结果表明环境、社会和公司治理信息披露比其他财务或公司数据对评级的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EPJ Data Science
EPJ Data Science MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EPJ Data Science covers a broad range of research areas and applications and particularly encourages contributions from techno-socio-economic systems, where it comprises those research lines that now regard the digital “tracks” of human beings as first-order objects for scientific investigation. Topics include, but are not limited to, human behavior, social interaction (including animal societies), economic and financial systems, management and business networks, socio-technical infrastructure, health and environmental systems, the science of science, as well as general risk and crisis scenario forecasting up to and including policy advice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信