Evaluating Coastal Wetland Restoration Using Drones and High-Resolution Imagery

IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
J. Mason Harris, Whitney P. Broussard, James A. Nelson
{"title":"Evaluating Coastal Wetland Restoration Using Drones and High-Resolution Imagery","authors":"J. Mason Harris, Whitney P. Broussard, James A. Nelson","doi":"10.1007/s12237-024-01376-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coastal marsh ecosystems are changing and being lost at a rapid rate around the world. One of the fastest rates of land loss, specifically coastal marsh habitat, occurs in Louisiana on the Northern Gulf Coast of the USA. To address this issue, state and federal agencies have undertaken massive wetland restoration efforts to preserve and restore coastal marsh habitats in Louisiana. For these efforts to be successful in the long-term, it is critical to understand what methodologies and techniques result in resilient restoration projects. However, traditional methods to monitor restoration success rely on labor intensive field measurements that are often limited in scope, difficult to maintain, and underfunded. Recent technological developments with uncrewed aircraft systems (UASs) and image processing have substantially improved the ability of restoration practitioners to use off-the-shelf UASs and cameras to map projects. We present a streamlined method using a commercially available drone with a high-resolution red, green, blue (RGB) camera to assess the effects of wetland restoration and integrate more modern tools into evaluation approaches. We conducted drone flights at restored brackish marshes of various ages using a space for time substitution with the goal of understanding the long-term success of marsh restoration. We observed that created marshes had higher land to water ratios than natural marshes. This finding suggests that these restored areas were gaining and maintaining elevation after approximately 10 years. Our method shows that drone surveys offer low-cost, minimally invasive methods for evaluating restored wetlands and ultimately tell us more about ecosystem function through realistic site-level habitat configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11921,"journal":{"name":"Estuaries and Coasts","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuaries and Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-024-01376-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coastal marsh ecosystems are changing and being lost at a rapid rate around the world. One of the fastest rates of land loss, specifically coastal marsh habitat, occurs in Louisiana on the Northern Gulf Coast of the USA. To address this issue, state and federal agencies have undertaken massive wetland restoration efforts to preserve and restore coastal marsh habitats in Louisiana. For these efforts to be successful in the long-term, it is critical to understand what methodologies and techniques result in resilient restoration projects. However, traditional methods to monitor restoration success rely on labor intensive field measurements that are often limited in scope, difficult to maintain, and underfunded. Recent technological developments with uncrewed aircraft systems (UASs) and image processing have substantially improved the ability of restoration practitioners to use off-the-shelf UASs and cameras to map projects. We present a streamlined method using a commercially available drone with a high-resolution red, green, blue (RGB) camera to assess the effects of wetland restoration and integrate more modern tools into evaluation approaches. We conducted drone flights at restored brackish marshes of various ages using a space for time substitution with the goal of understanding the long-term success of marsh restoration. We observed that created marshes had higher land to water ratios than natural marshes. This finding suggests that these restored areas were gaining and maintaining elevation after approximately 10 years. Our method shows that drone surveys offer low-cost, minimally invasive methods for evaluating restored wetlands and ultimately tell us more about ecosystem function through realistic site-level habitat configurations.

Abstract Image

利用无人机和高分辨率图像评估沿海湿地恢复情况
世界各地的沿海沼泽生态系统正在迅速变化和消失。美国北部海湾沿岸的路易斯安那州是土地流失速度最快的地区之一,特别是沿海沼泽栖息地。为解决这一问题,各州和联邦机构开展了大规模的湿地恢复工作,以保护和恢复路易斯安那州的沿海沼泽栖息地。要使这些努力取得长期成功,关键是要了解哪些方法和技术能使恢复项目具有复原力。然而,监测恢复成功与否的传统方法依赖于劳动密集型的实地测量,这些测量通常范围有限、难以维护且资金不足。最近,无人驾驶航空器系统(UAS)和图像处理技术的发展大大提高了修复工作者使用现成的无人驾驶航空器系统和照相机绘制项目地图的能力。我们介绍了一种简化的方法,使用带有高分辨率红、绿、蓝(RGB)相机的市售无人机来评估湿地恢复的效果,并将更多现代工具融入评估方法中。我们在不同年龄段的修复咸水沼泽地进行了无人机飞行,采用空间换时间的方法,目的是了解沼泽地修复的长期成功率。我们观察到,与天然沼泽相比,人工沼泽的水陆比更高。这一发现表明,经过大约 10 年的时间,这些恢复区域的海拔在不断升高和保持。我们的方法表明,无人机调查为评估恢复后的湿地提供了低成本、低侵入性的方法,并最终通过真实的地点级栖息地配置告诉我们更多关于生态系统功能的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Estuaries and Coasts
Estuaries and Coasts 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Estuaries and Coasts is the journal of the Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (CERF). Begun in 1977 as Chesapeake Science, the journal has gradually expanded its scope and circulation. Today, the journal publishes scholarly manuscripts on estuarine and near coastal ecosystems at the interface between the land and the sea where there are tidal fluctuations or sea water is diluted by fresh water. The interface is broadly defined to include estuaries and nearshore coastal waters including lagoons, wetlands, tidal fresh water, shores and beaches, but not the continental shelf. The journal covers research on physical, chemical, geological or biological processes, as well as applications to management of estuaries and coasts. The journal publishes original research findings, reviews and perspectives, techniques, comments, and management applications. Estuaries and Coasts will consider properly carried out studies that present inconclusive findings or document a failed replication of previously published work. Submissions that are primarily descriptive, strongly place-based, or only report on development of models or new methods without detailing their applications fall outside the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信