How to Implement a Knowledge Graph Completeness Assessment with the Guidance of User Requirements

IF 1.9 3区 计算机科学 Q3 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Ying Zhang, Gang Xiao
{"title":"How to Implement a Knowledge Graph Completeness Assessment with the Guidance of User Requirements","authors":"Ying Zhang, Gang Xiao","doi":"10.23919/jsee.2024.000046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of big data, many large-scale knowledge graphs have emerged to effectively organize the explosive growth of web data on the Internet. To select suitable knowledge graphs for use from many knowledge graphs, quality assessment is particularly important. As an important thing of quality assessment, completeness assessment generally refers to the ratio of the current data volume to the total data volume. When evaluating the completeness of a knowledge graph, it is often necessary to refine the completeness dimension by setting different completeness metrics to produce more complete and understandable evaluation results for the knowledge graph. However, lack of awareness of requirements is the most problematic quality issue. In the actual evaluation process, the existing completeness metrics need to consider the actual application. Therefore, to accurately recommend suitable knowledge graphs to many users, it is particularly important to develop relevant measurement metrics and formulate measurement schemes for completeness. In this paper, we will first clarify the concept of completeness, establish each metric of completeness, and finally design a measurement proposal for the completeness of knowledge graphs.","PeriodicalId":50030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/jsee.2024.000046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of big data, many large-scale knowledge graphs have emerged to effectively organize the explosive growth of web data on the Internet. To select suitable knowledge graphs for use from many knowledge graphs, quality assessment is particularly important. As an important thing of quality assessment, completeness assessment generally refers to the ratio of the current data volume to the total data volume. When evaluating the completeness of a knowledge graph, it is often necessary to refine the completeness dimension by setting different completeness metrics to produce more complete and understandable evaluation results for the knowledge graph. However, lack of awareness of requirements is the most problematic quality issue. In the actual evaluation process, the existing completeness metrics need to consider the actual application. Therefore, to accurately recommend suitable knowledge graphs to many users, it is particularly important to develop relevant measurement metrics and formulate measurement schemes for completeness. In this paper, we will first clarify the concept of completeness, establish each metric of completeness, and finally design a measurement proposal for the completeness of knowledge graphs.
如何在用户需求的指导下实施知识图谱完整性评估
在大数据背景下,出现了许多大规模知识图谱,以有效组织互联网上爆炸式增长的网络数据。要从众多知识图谱中挑选出适合使用的知识图谱,质量评估就显得尤为重要。作为质量评估的一项重要内容,完整性评估一般是指当前数据量与总数据量的比值。在评估知识图谱的完备性时,往往需要通过设置不同的完备性指标来细化完备性维度,从而得出更完备、更易理解的知识图谱评估结果。然而,缺乏需求意识是最棘手的质量问题。在实际评价过程中,现有的完备性指标需要考虑实际应用。因此,要想准确地向众多用户推荐合适的知识图谱,开发相关的测量指标和制定完备性测量方案就显得尤为重要。本文将首先明确完备性的概念,建立完备性的各项指标,最后设计出知识图谱完备性的测量方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics
Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信