Inaê de Oliveira , Karine J.V. Stoelben , Eduarda Santos Tulius , Vitória de Pereira Ferreira , Felipe P. Carpes
{"title":"Strength and clinical test combinations enhance predictions of sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics in single-leg landing","authors":"Inaê de Oliveira , Karine J.V. Stoelben , Eduarda Santos Tulius , Vitória de Pereira Ferreira , Felipe P. Carpes","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether clinical screening tests can predict lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics outcomes eliciting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk in single-leg landings.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Laboratory research.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty-six professional male futsal athletes.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Participants completed the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT), Lateral Step Down (LSD), Lunge, Hop tests, and isometric strength tests for clinical screening of lower extremity injury risk and performed single-leg landings to assess lower extremity 3D kinematics and kinetics outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>mSEBT, LSD, and isometric strength were the more important tests when constructing the prediction models. The predictive power of clinical tests for screening injury risk significantly increases when combined with strength measurements (p = 0.005, f<sup>2</sup> = 0.595). We discerned 11 biomechanical predictions, six explicitly related to the sagittal plane's biomechanics. Some predictions were leg-dependent, with muscle strength tests predominantly predicting biomechanical outcomes of the preferred leg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Combining clinical screening tests with strength measures enhances ACL injury risk factors prediction during single-leg landings. Clustering at least two tests improves prediction accuracy, aiding injury prevention planning and decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To determine whether clinical screening tests can predict lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics outcomes eliciting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk in single-leg landings.
Design
Cross-sectional study.
Setting
Laboratory research.
Participants
Twenty-six professional male futsal athletes.
Main outcome measures
Participants completed the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT), Lateral Step Down (LSD), Lunge, Hop tests, and isometric strength tests for clinical screening of lower extremity injury risk and performed single-leg landings to assess lower extremity 3D kinematics and kinetics outcomes.
Results
mSEBT, LSD, and isometric strength were the more important tests when constructing the prediction models. The predictive power of clinical tests for screening injury risk significantly increases when combined with strength measurements (p = 0.005, f2 = 0.595). We discerned 11 biomechanical predictions, six explicitly related to the sagittal plane's biomechanics. Some predictions were leg-dependent, with muscle strength tests predominantly predicting biomechanical outcomes of the preferred leg.
Conclusion
Combining clinical screening tests with strength measures enhances ACL injury risk factors prediction during single-leg landings. Clustering at least two tests improves prediction accuracy, aiding injury prevention planning and decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science.
The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.