Strength and clinical test combinations enhance predictions of sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics in single-leg landing

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Inaê de Oliveira , Karine J.V. Stoelben , Eduarda Santos Tulius , Vitória de Pereira Ferreira , Felipe P. Carpes
{"title":"Strength and clinical test combinations enhance predictions of sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics in single-leg landing","authors":"Inaê de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Karine J.V. Stoelben ,&nbsp;Eduarda Santos Tulius ,&nbsp;Vitória de Pereira Ferreira ,&nbsp;Felipe P. Carpes","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.06.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine whether clinical screening tests can predict lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics outcomes eliciting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk in single-leg landings.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Laboratory research.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Twenty-six professional male futsal athletes.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Participants completed the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT), Lateral Step Down (LSD), Lunge, Hop tests, and isometric strength tests for clinical screening of lower extremity injury risk and performed single-leg landings to assess lower extremity 3D kinematics and kinetics outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>mSEBT, LSD, and isometric strength were the more important tests when constructing the prediction models. The predictive power of clinical tests for screening injury risk significantly increases when combined with strength measurements (p = 0.005, f<sup>2</sup> = 0.595). We discerned 11 biomechanical predictions, six explicitly related to the sagittal plane's biomechanics. Some predictions were leg-dependent, with muscle strength tests predominantly predicting biomechanical outcomes of the preferred leg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Combining clinical screening tests with strength measures enhances ACL injury risk factors prediction during single-leg landings. Clustering at least two tests improves prediction accuracy, aiding injury prevention planning and decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether clinical screening tests can predict lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics outcomes eliciting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk in single-leg landings.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

Laboratory research.

Participants

Twenty-six professional male futsal athletes.

Main outcome measures

Participants completed the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT), Lateral Step Down (LSD), Lunge, Hop tests, and isometric strength tests for clinical screening of lower extremity injury risk and performed single-leg landings to assess lower extremity 3D kinematics and kinetics outcomes.

Results

mSEBT, LSD, and isometric strength were the more important tests when constructing the prediction models. The predictive power of clinical tests for screening injury risk significantly increases when combined with strength measurements (p = 0.005, f2 = 0.595). We discerned 11 biomechanical predictions, six explicitly related to the sagittal plane's biomechanics. Some predictions were leg-dependent, with muscle strength tests predominantly predicting biomechanical outcomes of the preferred leg.

Conclusion

Combining clinical screening tests with strength measures enhances ACL injury risk factors prediction during single-leg landings. Clustering at least two tests improves prediction accuracy, aiding injury prevention planning and decision-making.

力量和临床测试相结合,增强了对单腿着地时矢状面和额面生物力学的预测。
目的确定临床筛查测试能否预测单腿着地时引起前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤风险的下肢关节运动学和动力学结果:设计:横断面研究:参与者:26 名专业男子五人制足球运动员主要结果测量:结果:在构建预测模型时,mSEBT、LSD 和等长力量是更重要的测试。当临床测试与力量测量相结合时,对筛选损伤风险的预测能力会显著提高(p = 0.005,f2 = 0.595)。我们发现了 11 项生物力学预测,其中 6 项与矢状面生物力学明确相关。一些预测结果与腿有关,肌力测试主要预测首选腿的生物力学结果:结论:将临床筛选测试与力量测量相结合,可提高单腿着地时前交叉韧带损伤风险因素的预测能力。结论:将临床筛查测试与力量测量相结合可提高单腿着地时前交叉韧带损伤风险因素的预测能力,而将至少两种测试组合在一起可提高预测的准确性,有助于损伤预防计划的制定和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信