Confidence for intrusion errors during the attentional blink depends on target-defining features

Abstract

Research surrounding the attentional blink phenomenon – a deficit in responding to the second of two temporally proximal stimuli when presented 150–500 ms after the first – has used a wide variety of target-defining and response features of stimuli. The typical U-shape curve for absolute performance is robust, surviving across most stimulus features, and therefore changes in performance are discussed as dynamics in an attentional system that are nonspecific a stimulus type. However, the patterns of errors participants make might not show the same robustness, and participants’ confidences in these errors might differ – potentially suggesting the involvement of different attentional or perceptual mechanisms. The present research is a comparison of error patterns and confidence in those errors when letter target stimuli are defined by either the color of the letter, the presence of a surrounding annulus, or the color of the annulus. Across three experiments, we show that participants erroneously report stimuli that are further away from T2 and they are similarly confident in specifically their post-target errors as their correct responses when annuli define targets, but not when color of the letter defines targets. Experiment 3 provides some evidence to suggest that this error pattern and associated confidence is time-dependent when the color of the annulus defines the target, but not when the color of the letter defines the target. These results raise questions concerning the nature of the errors and possibly the mechanisms of the attentional blink phenomenon itself.