Exploring the effect of the nerve conduction distance on the MScanFit method ofmotor unit number estimation (MUNE)

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
H.Evren Boran , Halil Can Alaydin , Ilker Arslan , Ozlem Kurtkaya Kocak , Hasan Kılınc , Bulent Cengiz
{"title":"Exploring the effect of the nerve conduction distance on the MScanFit method ofmotor unit number estimation (MUNE)","authors":"H.Evren Boran ,&nbsp;Halil Can Alaydin ,&nbsp;Ilker Arslan ,&nbsp;Ozlem Kurtkaya Kocak ,&nbsp;Hasan Kılınc ,&nbsp;Bulent Cengiz","doi":"10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) is a sensitive method for detecting motor unit loss and has demonstrated high reproducibility in various settings. In this study, our aim was to assess the outputs of this method when the nerve conduction distance is increased.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MScanFit recordings were obtained from the abductor digiti minimi muscle of 20 healthy volunteers. To evaluate the effect of nerve conduction distance, the ulnar nerve was stimulated from the wrist and elbow respectively. Reproducibility of MUNE, compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and other motor unit parameters were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Motor unit numbers obtained from stimulation at the wrist and elbow did not significantly differ and exhibited strong consistency in the ICC test (120.3 ± 23.7 vs. 118.5 ± 27.9, <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05, ICC: 0.88). Similar repeatability values were noted for other parameters. However, the Largest Unit (%) displayed notable variability between the two regions and exhibited a negative correlation with nerve conduction distance.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings indicate that MScanFit can consistently calculate motor unit numbers and most of its outputs without substantial influence from nerve conduction distance. Exploring MScanFit's capabilities in various settings could enhance our understanding of its strengths and limitations for extensive use in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19134,"journal":{"name":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":"54 5","pages":"Article 102991"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0987705324000492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) is a sensitive method for detecting motor unit loss and has demonstrated high reproducibility in various settings. In this study, our aim was to assess the outputs of this method when the nerve conduction distance is increased.

Methods

MScanFit recordings were obtained from the abductor digiti minimi muscle of 20 healthy volunteers. To evaluate the effect of nerve conduction distance, the ulnar nerve was stimulated from the wrist and elbow respectively. Reproducibility of MUNE, compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and other motor unit parameters were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Results

Motor unit numbers obtained from stimulation at the wrist and elbow did not significantly differ and exhibited strong consistency in the ICC test (120.3 ± 23.7 vs. 118.5 ± 27.9, p > 0.05, ICC: 0.88). Similar repeatability values were noted for other parameters. However, the Largest Unit (%) displayed notable variability between the two regions and exhibited a negative correlation with nerve conduction distance.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that MScanFit can consistently calculate motor unit numbers and most of its outputs without substantial influence from nerve conduction distance. Exploring MScanFit's capabilities in various settings could enhance our understanding of its strengths and limitations for extensive use in clinical practice.

探索神经传导距离对运动单位数量估算(MUNE)的 MScanFit 方法的影响。
目的:MScanFit运动单位数量估算(MUNE)是一种检测运动单位缺失的灵敏方法,在各种情况下均表现出较高的可重复性。在本研究中,我们的目的是评估该方法在神经传导距离增加时的输出结果:从 20 名健康志愿者的小腿内收肌获得 MScanFit 记录。为了评估神经传导距离的影响,分别从手腕和肘部刺激尺神经。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估了MUNE、复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)和其他运动单位参数的再现性:结果:通过刺激手腕和肘部获得的运动单位数量没有明显差异,并且在 ICC 测试中表现出很强的一致性(120.3 ± 23.7 vs. 118.5 ± 27.9,p > 0.05,ICC:0.88)。其他参数也具有类似的重复性。然而,最大单位(%)在两个区域之间显示出明显的变异性,并与神经传导距离呈负相关:我们的研究结果表明,MScanFit 可以稳定地计算运动单位数量及其大部分输出结果,而不会受到神经传导距离的实质性影响。在各种环境下探索 MScanFit 的功能可以加深我们对其优势和局限性的理解,从而在临床实践中广泛使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
55
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Neurophysiologie Clinique / Clinical Neurophysiology (NCCN) is the official organ of the French Society of Clinical Neurophysiology (SNCLF). This journal is published 6 times a year, and is aimed at an international readership, with articles written in English. These can take the form of original research papers, comprehensive review articles, viewpoints, short communications, technical notes, editorials or letters to the Editor. The theme is the neurophysiological investigation of central or peripheral nervous system or muscle in healthy humans or patients. The journal focuses on key areas of clinical neurophysiology: electro- or magneto-encephalography, evoked potentials of all modalities, electroneuromyography, sleep, pain, posture, balance, motor control, autonomic nervous system, cognition, invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation, signal processing, bio-engineering, functional imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信