Transitioning from Heterogeneous VSC to Homogeneous VSC Based Power Systems: Leveraging Dual-Port Grid-Forming VSCs

iEnergy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.23919/IEN.2024.0009
Shuo Zhang;Wei Qiao;Liyan Qu;Jun Wang
{"title":"Transitioning from Heterogeneous VSC to Homogeneous VSC Based Power Systems: Leveraging Dual-Port Grid-Forming VSCs","authors":"Shuo Zhang;Wei Qiao;Liyan Qu;Jun Wang","doi":"10.23919/IEN.2024.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grid-tie voltage source converters (VSCs) can operate in three distinct modes: AC-dominant, DC-dominant, and balanced, depending on the placement of the stiff voltage sources, as shown in Figure 1. The distinct operation modes of VSCs typically require different synchronization control techniques. For instance, the grid-following (GFL) control, which utilizes a phase-locked loop to track the AC grid phase and frequency, can be employed for VSCs operating in the AC-dominant mode and the balanced mode. On the other hand, the grid-forming (GFM) control is utilized for VSCs operating in the DC-dominant mode and the balanced mode. Therefore, neither GFM control nor GFL control can serve as a universal synchronization control technique for VSCs to operate in all of the three modes. While the combination of the GFL VSCs and the GFM VSCs can handle applications that require the VSCs to operate in all of the three modes, effectively accommodating and coordinating the heterogeneous GFL and GFM VSCs remains challenging for power systems.","PeriodicalId":100648,"journal":{"name":"iEnergy","volume":"3 2","pages":"75-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10587142","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iEnergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10587142/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grid-tie voltage source converters (VSCs) can operate in three distinct modes: AC-dominant, DC-dominant, and balanced, depending on the placement of the stiff voltage sources, as shown in Figure 1. The distinct operation modes of VSCs typically require different synchronization control techniques. For instance, the grid-following (GFL) control, which utilizes a phase-locked loop to track the AC grid phase and frequency, can be employed for VSCs operating in the AC-dominant mode and the balanced mode. On the other hand, the grid-forming (GFM) control is utilized for VSCs operating in the DC-dominant mode and the balanced mode. Therefore, neither GFM control nor GFL control can serve as a universal synchronization control technique for VSCs to operate in all of the three modes. While the combination of the GFL VSCs and the GFM VSCs can handle applications that require the VSCs to operate in all of the three modes, effectively accommodating and coordinating the heterogeneous GFL and GFM VSCs remains challenging for power systems.
从异构 VSC 过渡到基于同构 VSC 的电力系统:利用双端口电网型 VSC
并网电压源变换器(VSC)可以在三种不同的模式下运行:如图 1 所示,根据刚性电压源的位置,可分为交流主导型、直流主导型和平衡型。VSC 的不同运行模式通常需要不同的同步控制技术。例如,电网跟踪(GFL)控制利用锁相环来跟踪交流电网相位和频率,可用于在交流主导模式和平衡模式下运行的 VSC。另一方面,电网形成(GFM)控制则适用于在直流主导模式和平衡模式下运行的 VSC。因此,无论是 GFM 控制还是 GFL 控制,都不能作为 VSC 在所有三种模式下运行的通用同步控制技术。虽然 GFL 可控硅和 GFM 可控硅的组合可以处理要求可控硅在所有三种模式下运行的应用,但有效容纳和协调异构的 GFL 和 GFM 可控硅对于电力系统来说仍然具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信