{"title":"Feasibility Study of Renewable e-Methanol Production: A Substitution Pathway from Blue to Green","authors":"Peiyang Li;Jin Lin;Zhipeng Yu;Yingtian Chi;Kai Zhao","doi":"10.23919/IEN.2024.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Producing renewable e-methanol from e-hydrogen and diverse carbon sources is an essential way for clean methanol preparation. Despite this, the technical and economic feasibility of different e-methanols has yet to be thoroughly compared, leaving the most promising pathway to achieve commercialization yet evident. This paper reports a preliminary analysis of the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and costs of four renewable e-methanols with different carbon sources: bio-carbon, direct air capture (DAC), fossil fuel carbon capture (FFCC), and fossil. The results indicate that renewable e-methanol costs (4167–10250 CNY/tonne) 2–4 times the market rate of grey methanol. However, with the carbon tax and the projected decline in e-H\n<inf>2</inf>\n costs, blue e-methanol may initially replace diesel in inland navigation, followed by a shift from heavy fuel oil (HFO) to green e-methanol in ocean shipping. Furthermore, the e-H\n<inf>2</inf>\n cost and the availability of green carbon are vital factors affecting cost-effectiveness. A reduction in e-H\n<inf>2</inf>\n cost from 2.1 CNY/Nm\n<sup>3</sup>\n to 1.1 CNY/Nm\n<sup>3</sup>\n resulting from a transition from an annual to a daily scheduling period, could lower e-methanol costs by 1200 to 2100 CNY. This paper also provides an in-depth discussion on the challenges and opportunities associated with the various green carbon sources.","PeriodicalId":100648,"journal":{"name":"iEnergy","volume":"3 2","pages":"108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10587141","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iEnergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10587141/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Producing renewable e-methanol from e-hydrogen and diverse carbon sources is an essential way for clean methanol preparation. Despite this, the technical and economic feasibility of different e-methanols has yet to be thoroughly compared, leaving the most promising pathway to achieve commercialization yet evident. This paper reports a preliminary analysis of the lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and costs of four renewable e-methanols with different carbon sources: bio-carbon, direct air capture (DAC), fossil fuel carbon capture (FFCC), and fossil. The results indicate that renewable e-methanol costs (4167–10250 CNY/tonne) 2–4 times the market rate of grey methanol. However, with the carbon tax and the projected decline in e-H
2
costs, blue e-methanol may initially replace diesel in inland navigation, followed by a shift from heavy fuel oil (HFO) to green e-methanol in ocean shipping. Furthermore, the e-H
2
cost and the availability of green carbon are vital factors affecting cost-effectiveness. A reduction in e-H
2
cost from 2.1 CNY/Nm
3
to 1.1 CNY/Nm
3
resulting from a transition from an annual to a daily scheduling period, could lower e-methanol costs by 1200 to 2100 CNY. This paper also provides an in-depth discussion on the challenges and opportunities associated with the various green carbon sources.