A systematic review of the integration between occupational and process safety risk analysis methodologies

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Khalil Taherzadeh Chenani , Esmaeil Zarei , Mohammad Yazdi , Karen Klockner , Moslem Alimohammadlou , Mojtaba Kamalinia
{"title":"A systematic review of the integration between occupational and process safety risk analysis methodologies","authors":"Khalil Taherzadeh Chenani ,&nbsp;Esmaeil Zarei ,&nbsp;Mohammad Yazdi ,&nbsp;Karen Klockner ,&nbsp;Moslem Alimohammadlou ,&nbsp;Mojtaba Kamalinia","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Safety considerations in process industries primarily revolve around process and occupational safety. In recent times, there has been a growing emphasis on the development and application of risk estimation frameworks to provide a more holistic evaluation of these critical risk types. While previous studies have offered valuable insights into the concurrent assessment and management of occupational and process hazards, a comprehensive review of frameworks and models incorporating risk estimation dimensions is lacking. Accordingly, this review aims to systematically examine studies that have devised methods to integrate the estimation of both occupational and process risks, with a focus on categorizing applied criteria for risk estimation. A thorough literature review was conducted using reputable databases, including Web of Science and Scopus, resulting in the identification of 16 studies meeting the predetermined inclusion criteria. Subsequently, the selected studies were classified into four categories: (1) New Framework Developments, (2) Existing Framework Adjustments, (3) Hybrid Frameworks, and (4) Management System/Risk Management Integration. Furthermore, employing a relevant risk dimension perspective, the identified studies were categorized based on four primary dimensions: (a) Scenario Probability, (b) Scenario Consequences, and (c) Economical Damage. It is crucial to note that the existing literature on occupational-process hazards and associated risk dimensions lacks reliable and robust studies. Therefore, further research efforts are imperative to effectively evaluate, quantify, and precisely delineate diverse risk dimensions within the integrated domain of occupational-process safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024001451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety considerations in process industries primarily revolve around process and occupational safety. In recent times, there has been a growing emphasis on the development and application of risk estimation frameworks to provide a more holistic evaluation of these critical risk types. While previous studies have offered valuable insights into the concurrent assessment and management of occupational and process hazards, a comprehensive review of frameworks and models incorporating risk estimation dimensions is lacking. Accordingly, this review aims to systematically examine studies that have devised methods to integrate the estimation of both occupational and process risks, with a focus on categorizing applied criteria for risk estimation. A thorough literature review was conducted using reputable databases, including Web of Science and Scopus, resulting in the identification of 16 studies meeting the predetermined inclusion criteria. Subsequently, the selected studies were classified into four categories: (1) New Framework Developments, (2) Existing Framework Adjustments, (3) Hybrid Frameworks, and (4) Management System/Risk Management Integration. Furthermore, employing a relevant risk dimension perspective, the identified studies were categorized based on four primary dimensions: (a) Scenario Probability, (b) Scenario Consequences, and (c) Economical Damage. It is crucial to note that the existing literature on occupational-process hazards and associated risk dimensions lacks reliable and robust studies. Therefore, further research efforts are imperative to effectively evaluate, quantify, and precisely delineate diverse risk dimensions within the integrated domain of occupational-process safety.

对职业安全和工艺安全风险分析方法整合的系统审查
流程工业的安全考虑因素主要围绕流程和职业安全。近来,人们越来越重视开发和应用风险评估框架,以便对这些关键风险类型进行更全面的评估。虽然以往的研究为同时评估和管理职业与工艺危害提供了宝贵的见解,但目前还缺乏对包含风险评估维度的框架和模型的全面回顾。因此,本综述旨在系统性地研究已设计出整合职业风险和工艺风险评估方法的研究,重点是对风险评估的应用标准进行分类。我们利用 Web of Science 和 Scopus 等知名数据库进行了全面的文献综述,最终确定了 16 项符合预定纳入标准的研究。随后,所选研究被分为四类:(1) 新框架开发,(2) 现有框架调整,(3) 混合框架,(4) 管理系统/风险管理整合。此外,采用相关风险维度视角,根据四个主要维度对确定的研究进行分类:(a) 情景概率、(b) 情景后果和 (c) 经济损失。必须指出的是,关于职业过程危害和相关风险维度的现有文献缺乏可靠和有力的研究。因此,进一步的研究工作势在必行,以有效评估、量化和精确划分职业流程安全综合领域内的各种风险维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信