Strategic analysis of vertical integration in cross-border e-commerce logistics service supply chains

IF 8.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Longxue Hua, Yingliang Wu
{"title":"Strategic analysis of vertical integration in cross-border e-commerce logistics service supply chains","authors":"Longxue Hua,&nbsp;Yingliang Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2024.103626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The boom in cross-border e-commerce (CBEC) brings opportunities and challenges to its logistics. Integrated logistics service providers (ILSPs) are becoming increasingly important in the CBEC industry by offering cost-effective integrated logistics services. We construct a three-echelon supply chain consisting of one ILSP, one CBEC platform, and one functional logistics service provider (FLSP), and consider three scenarios, namely, no integration (VD), vertical integration dominated by ILSP (VI-L), and vertical integration dominated by platform (VI-P). This study aims to find out which vertical integration strategy is more effective in mitigating the double marginalization problem in supply chain, what the influencing factors are, and how these factors affect vertical integration performance. The results show that higher channel power does not always result in greater profits for the ILSP but does for the CBEC platform. With low logistics cost performance, mode VI-L is optimal for the ILSP and becomes the equilibrium strategy in which increased logistics cost investment benefits the ILSP but harms the platform. With high logistics cost performance, mode VI-P is optimal for all parties and generates the highest logistics service level, in which the increased logistics cost investment benefits the platform but harms the ILSP, resulting in the equilibrium strategy evolving from mode VI-P to mode VI-L. The FLSP’s preference aligns with the improvement of logistics service level when the market size is small or moderate. We also extend our model to encompass more scenarios and find that the exogenous logistics service price or service level can exacerbate the profit conflict between the ILSP and the platform, resulting in no strategic equilibrium for mode VI-P. Additionally, it is not always the best choice for CBEC platforms to self-build logistics systems to directly integrate FLSP’s services, compared to taking the lead in vertical integration with a professional ILSP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"188 ","pages":"Article 103626"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524002175","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The boom in cross-border e-commerce (CBEC) brings opportunities and challenges to its logistics. Integrated logistics service providers (ILSPs) are becoming increasingly important in the CBEC industry by offering cost-effective integrated logistics services. We construct a three-echelon supply chain consisting of one ILSP, one CBEC platform, and one functional logistics service provider (FLSP), and consider three scenarios, namely, no integration (VD), vertical integration dominated by ILSP (VI-L), and vertical integration dominated by platform (VI-P). This study aims to find out which vertical integration strategy is more effective in mitigating the double marginalization problem in supply chain, what the influencing factors are, and how these factors affect vertical integration performance. The results show that higher channel power does not always result in greater profits for the ILSP but does for the CBEC platform. With low logistics cost performance, mode VI-L is optimal for the ILSP and becomes the equilibrium strategy in which increased logistics cost investment benefits the ILSP but harms the platform. With high logistics cost performance, mode VI-P is optimal for all parties and generates the highest logistics service level, in which the increased logistics cost investment benefits the platform but harms the ILSP, resulting in the equilibrium strategy evolving from mode VI-P to mode VI-L. The FLSP’s preference aligns with the improvement of logistics service level when the market size is small or moderate. We also extend our model to encompass more scenarios and find that the exogenous logistics service price or service level can exacerbate the profit conflict between the ILSP and the platform, resulting in no strategic equilibrium for mode VI-P. Additionally, it is not always the best choice for CBEC platforms to self-build logistics systems to directly integrate FLSP’s services, compared to taking the lead in vertical integration with a professional ILSP.

跨境电商物流服务供应链垂直整合的战略分析
跨境电子商务(CBEC)的蓬勃发展为其物流带来了机遇和挑战。综合物流服务供应商(ILSP)通过提供具有成本效益的综合物流服务,在 CBEC 行业中变得越来越重要。我们构建了一条由一个综合物流服务提供商、一个 CBEC 平台和一个功能性物流服务提供商组成的三梯队供应链,并考虑了三种情况,即无整合(VD)、综合物流服务提供商主导的纵向整合(VI-L)和平台主导的纵向整合(VI-P)。本研究旨在找出哪种纵向一体化战略能更有效地缓解供应链中的双重边缘化问题,影响因素是什么,以及这些因素如何影响纵向一体化绩效。研究结果表明,较高的渠道能力并不总能为 ILSP 带来更多利润,但却能为 CBEC 平台带来更多利润。在物流成本绩效较低的情况下,VI-L 模式对 ILSP 来说是最优的,并成为一种均衡战略,即增加物流成本投资对 ILSP 有利,但对平台不利。在物流成本绩效较高的情况下,VI-P 模式对各方都是最优的,能产生最高的物流服务水平,在这种情况下,增加物流成本投资对平台有利,但对 ILSP 不利,从而导致均衡战略从 VI-P 模式演变为 VI-L 模式。当市场规模较小或适中时,FLSP 的偏好与物流服务水平的提高相一致。我们还将模型扩展到更多场景,发现外生物流服务价格或服务水平会加剧 ILSP 与平台之间的利润冲突,导致模式 VI-P 没有战略均衡。此外,对于 CBEC 平台来说,自建物流系统直接整合 FLSP 的服务并不一定是最好的选择,相比之下,与专业的 ILSP 进行垂直整合才是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信