Shellfish gathering during MIS 5c-d at Klasies River main site and Blombos Cave, southern Cape, South Africa: An inter-assemblage comparison

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 N/A ARCHAEOLOGY
Kokeli P. Ryano , Karen L. van Niekerk , Christopher S. Henshilwood , Sarah Wurz
{"title":"Shellfish gathering during MIS 5c-d at Klasies River main site and Blombos Cave, southern Cape, South Africa: An inter-assemblage comparison","authors":"Kokeli P. Ryano ,&nbsp;Karen L. van Niekerk ,&nbsp;Christopher S. Henshilwood ,&nbsp;Sarah Wurz","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Klasies River main site and Blombos Cave, both situated in the southern Cape, South Africa, provide new insights on shellfish harvesting behaviour during MIS 5c-d. This is a period linked to the MSA II Lower or Mossel Bay techno-complex. The shellfish assemblage composition at Klasies River main site and Blombos Cave are somewhat different and fluctuation in species representation occurs through time at each site. For example, at Klasies River main site, <em>Turbo sarmaticus</em> and <em>Perna perna</em> are predominant while some of the lesser represented species include <em>Diloma sinensis</em> and <em>Burnupena cincta limbosa</em>. <em>T. sarmaticus</em> dominates the Blombos Cave shellfish assemblage followed by <em>Cymbula oculus</em>, <em>P. perna</em>, <em>Dinoplax gigas</em>, and <em>Scutellastra argenvillei</em>. The coastal habitat at both sites were generally rocky with smaller sandy shores during some periods, especially in layers Black Occupational Soils Three (Klasies River main site) and CJ (Blombos Cave). Sea surface temperatures were relatively colder than today in the southern Cape during this period. <em>T. sarmaticus</em> individuals are larger at Blombos Cave than at Klasies River Main site and there are clear differences in the ratio of <em>T. sarmaticus</em> shell weight to opercula weight at Klasies River main site compared to Blombos Cave. Size differences may be explained by climatic or environmental factors, and contrasting ratios may have resulted from different processing strategies at these two sites. Alternatively, the Klasies River deposits may have been subjected to more intensive post depositional processes influencing the preservation of the shell.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X24002955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Klasies River main site and Blombos Cave, both situated in the southern Cape, South Africa, provide new insights on shellfish harvesting behaviour during MIS 5c-d. This is a period linked to the MSA II Lower or Mossel Bay techno-complex. The shellfish assemblage composition at Klasies River main site and Blombos Cave are somewhat different and fluctuation in species representation occurs through time at each site. For example, at Klasies River main site, Turbo sarmaticus and Perna perna are predominant while some of the lesser represented species include Diloma sinensis and Burnupena cincta limbosa. T. sarmaticus dominates the Blombos Cave shellfish assemblage followed by Cymbula oculus, P. perna, Dinoplax gigas, and Scutellastra argenvillei. The coastal habitat at both sites were generally rocky with smaller sandy shores during some periods, especially in layers Black Occupational Soils Three (Klasies River main site) and CJ (Blombos Cave). Sea surface temperatures were relatively colder than today in the southern Cape during this period. T. sarmaticus individuals are larger at Blombos Cave than at Klasies River Main site and there are clear differences in the ratio of T. sarmaticus shell weight to opercula weight at Klasies River main site compared to Blombos Cave. Size differences may be explained by climatic or environmental factors, and contrasting ratios may have resulted from different processing strategies at these two sites. Alternatively, the Klasies River deposits may have been subjected to more intensive post depositional processes influencing the preservation of the shell.

南非南开普省克拉西斯河主要遗址和布隆博斯洞穴 MIS 5c-d 期间的贝类采集:贝类组合间的比较
克拉西斯河主遗址和布隆博斯洞穴均位于南非开普省南部,它们为研究 MIS 5c-d 期间的贝类捕捞行为提供了新的视角。这一时期与 MSA II 下层或莫塞尔湾技术复合体有关。克拉西斯河主要地点和布隆博斯洞穴的贝类组合构成有些不同,每个地点的物种代表性随时间发生波动。例如,在 Klasies 河主要地点,Turbo sarmaticus 和 Perna perna 占主导地位,而一些较少的物种包括 Diloma sinensis 和 Burnupena cincta limbosa。在布隆博斯洞穴贝类群中,T. sarmaticus 占主导地位,其次是 Cymbula oculus、P. perna、Dinoplax gigas 和 Scutellastra argenvillei。这两个地点的沿岸生境一般都是岩石,在某些时期也有较小的沙岸,特别是在黑占土三层(克拉西斯河主地点)和 CJ 层(布隆博斯洞穴)。在此期间,开普南部的海面温度比现在相对要低。布隆博斯洞穴中的沼泽栉水母个体比克拉塞斯河主遗址中的大,克拉塞斯河主遗址中的沼泽栉水母贝壳重量与厣重量之比明显不同于布隆博斯洞穴中的沼泽栉水母贝壳重量与厣重量之比。大小差异可能是由于气候或环境因素造成的,而不同的比率可能是这两个地点不同的加工策略造成的。另外,克拉西斯河沉积物可能经历了更密集的沉积后过程,影响了贝壳的保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信