A review evaluating the gaps in plastic impacts in life cycle assessment

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Kealohi Sabate, Alissa Kendall
{"title":"A review evaluating the gaps in plastic impacts in life cycle assessment","authors":"Kealohi Sabate,&nbsp;Alissa Kendall","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Plastics provide numerous societal benefits but have adverse effects on the environment over their life cycles; however, the magnitude, time horizon, and scope of these impacts is uncertain, particularly for plastics that are lost to the environment. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method intended to capture environmental impacts of a product from cradle-to-grave, and has often been applied to plastics. This article undertakes a systematic literature review of LCA and life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods tailored to plastics, with particular focus on end-of-life stages and impacts from plastics lost to the environment. The review identified 1541 articles for screening, of which 51 were selected for review. Results show that even when LCA studies are largely focused on end-of-life, most ignore the risks of losing plastics to the environment, and omit the attendant impacts. Articles devoted to creating LCIA methods for plastics in the environment are growing in number, and focus primarily, on the effects of macroplastics in the marine environment. The review shows an urgent need to better understand the probability of plastic losses to the environment and their fate and transport, and develop impact characterization factors that better reflect the effects of plastics on humans and ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100205"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000436/pdfft?md5=71c122aef386d5a53b1144924c76d7c4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666789424000436-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plastics provide numerous societal benefits but have adverse effects on the environment over their life cycles; however, the magnitude, time horizon, and scope of these impacts is uncertain, particularly for plastics that are lost to the environment. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method intended to capture environmental impacts of a product from cradle-to-grave, and has often been applied to plastics. This article undertakes a systematic literature review of LCA and life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods tailored to plastics, with particular focus on end-of-life stages and impacts from plastics lost to the environment. The review identified 1541 articles for screening, of which 51 were selected for review. Results show that even when LCA studies are largely focused on end-of-life, most ignore the risks of losing plastics to the environment, and omit the attendant impacts. Articles devoted to creating LCIA methods for plastics in the environment are growing in number, and focus primarily, on the effects of macroplastics in the marine environment. The review shows an urgent need to better understand the probability of plastic losses to the environment and their fate and transport, and develop impact characterization factors that better reflect the effects of plastics on humans and ecosystems.

回顾评估生命周期评估中塑料影响方面的差距
塑料可为社会带来诸多益处,但在其生命周期中也会对环境造成不利影响;然而,这些影响的程度、时间跨度和范围并不确定,尤其是对那些在环境中流失的塑料而言。生命周期评估(LCA)是一种旨在捕捉产品从摇篮到坟墓对环境影响的方法,通常被应用于塑料领域。本文对专门针对塑料的生命周期评估和生命周期影响评估 (LCIA) 方法进行了系统的文献综述,尤其关注塑料的生命末期阶段以及塑料流失到环境中造成的影响。该综述共筛选出 1541 篇文章,其中 51 篇被选中进行综述。结果表明,即使生命周期评估研究主要集中在生命末期,大多数研究也忽视了塑料流失到环境中的风险,并忽略了随之而来的影响。致力于为环境中的塑料创建 LCIA 方法的文章越来越多,而且主要侧重于宏观塑料对海洋环境的影响。综述表明,迫切需要更好地了解塑料流失到环境中的概率及其归宿和迁移,并开发能更好地反映塑料对人类和生态系统影响的影响表征因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信