Water storage levels and water storage capacity of an extensive green roof quantified from multi-year eddy covariance measurements

IF 3.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Niklas Markolf, Jannik Heusinger, Stephan Weber
{"title":"Water storage levels and water storage capacity of an extensive green roof quantified from multi-year eddy covariance measurements","authors":"Niklas Markolf,&nbsp;Jannik Heusinger,&nbsp;Stephan Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Green roofs provide several ecosystem services that may aid cities in locally adapting to climate change such as the regulation of local air temperatures by evaporative cooling and the limitation of stormwater damage by retention of precipitation water in the green roof substrate. In the past, water storage levels in green roofs have often been inferred from substrate moisture measurements. Here, we test the applicability of recession analysis to quantify water storage levels from the temporal decrease in evapotranspiration during dry periods using latent heat flux densities measured by the eddy covariance (EC) method over the time period of 2015–2020. We found water storage levels to vary between 0.1 and 35.8 mm (median of 4.2 mm). The water storage capacity of 35.8 mm was larger by a factor of ≥27 compared to modelled values for paved urban surfaces (1–1.3 mm). Seasonal variation of water storage levels inferred by EC was characterised by an energy-limited evapotranspiration regime in winter and water limitation during summer. The increase in the green roof vegetation coverage over time resulted in a slight increase in the capacity of the green roof to store water. Water storage levels calculated from in-situ substrate moisture sensors found very similar results compared to the EC recession analysis. Multi-year eddy covariance observations prove a useful tool to quantify and monitor variation of water storage levels in an extensive green roof, as long as evapotranspiration is not limited by available energy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 107333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001587/pdfft?md5=bb760e045e5decbf503c176b38841459&pid=1-s2.0-S0925857424001587-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green roofs provide several ecosystem services that may aid cities in locally adapting to climate change such as the regulation of local air temperatures by evaporative cooling and the limitation of stormwater damage by retention of precipitation water in the green roof substrate. In the past, water storage levels in green roofs have often been inferred from substrate moisture measurements. Here, we test the applicability of recession analysis to quantify water storage levels from the temporal decrease in evapotranspiration during dry periods using latent heat flux densities measured by the eddy covariance (EC) method over the time period of 2015–2020. We found water storage levels to vary between 0.1 and 35.8 mm (median of 4.2 mm). The water storage capacity of 35.8 mm was larger by a factor of ≥27 compared to modelled values for paved urban surfaces (1–1.3 mm). Seasonal variation of water storage levels inferred by EC was characterised by an energy-limited evapotranspiration regime in winter and water limitation during summer. The increase in the green roof vegetation coverage over time resulted in a slight increase in the capacity of the green roof to store water. Water storage levels calculated from in-situ substrate moisture sensors found very similar results compared to the EC recession analysis. Multi-year eddy covariance observations prove a useful tool to quantify and monitor variation of water storage levels in an extensive green roof, as long as evapotranspiration is not limited by available energy.

通过多年涡度协方差测量量化大面积绿色屋顶的蓄水量和蓄水能力
绿色屋顶提供了多种生态系统服务,可帮助城市在当地适应气候变化,例如通过蒸发冷却调节当地气温,以及通过将降水保留在绿色屋顶基质中限制暴雨造成的破坏。过去,屋顶绿化中的蓄水水平通常是通过基质湿度测量来推断的。在此,我们利用涡度协方差(EC)方法测量了 2015-2020 年期间的潜热通量密度,测试了衰退分析的适用性,以从干旱期蒸散量的时间性减少来量化蓄水量。我们发现蓄水量在 0.1 至 35.8 毫米之间变化(中位数为 4.2 毫米)。35.8 毫米的蓄水量比城市铺装路面的模拟值(1-1.3 毫米)大≥27 倍。根据 EC 推断的蓄水量季节变化特点是冬季蒸散量受能量限制,夏季蓄水量受限。随着时间的推移,屋顶绿化植被覆盖率的增加使屋顶绿化的蓄水能力略有提高。通过现场基质湿度传感器计算得出的蓄水量与导电率衰退分析的结果非常相似。多年涡度协方差观测结果证明,只要蒸发蒸腾作用不受可用能量的限制,它就是量化和监测大面积绿色屋顶蓄水量变化的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering
Ecological Engineering 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
293
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers. Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信