Does empathy decline in the clinical phase of medical education? A study of students at Leicester medical school

Leila Keshtkar , Andy Ward , Rachel Winter , Char Leung , Jeremy Howick
{"title":"Does empathy decline in the clinical phase of medical education? A study of students at Leicester medical school","authors":"Leila Keshtkar ,&nbsp;Andy Ward ,&nbsp;Rachel Winter ,&nbsp;Char Leung ,&nbsp;Jeremy Howick","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine whether medical student empathy changes throughout the five years of a UK medical school.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Students completed an online version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE-S) during the 2022–2023 academic year. Comparisons of empathy scores were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent <em>t</em>-tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Empathy scores varied across different years of medical school (<em>P</em> ≤ 0.001), with a small drop in empathy between the pre-clinical and clinical phases of medical school (Mean difference = 1.82, <em>P</em> = 0.025). Male students scored lower than female students and there was no statistically significant difference between the mean empathy score and speciality interest.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Students' empathy appeared declined slightly as they progressed through medical school. As a crucial component of good clinical care, interventions in medical education to enhance empathy should be prioritised.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>This is the first time following the COVID-19 pandemic that medical student empathy was measured across all five years of a medical school. Unlike many previous related studies, we identified the point at which empathy appears to decline, providing guidance for educators who can target empathy enhancing interventions where they are most needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000645/pdfft?md5=816af771b0520b2cb297a4a716cbc7d5&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000645-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine whether medical student empathy changes throughout the five years of a UK medical school.

Methods

Students completed an online version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE-S) during the 2022–2023 academic year. Comparisons of empathy scores were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and independent t-tests.

Results

Empathy scores varied across different years of medical school (P ≤ 0.001), with a small drop in empathy between the pre-clinical and clinical phases of medical school (Mean difference = 1.82, P = 0.025). Male students scored lower than female students and there was no statistically significant difference between the mean empathy score and speciality interest.

Conclusions

Students' empathy appeared declined slightly as they progressed through medical school. As a crucial component of good clinical care, interventions in medical education to enhance empathy should be prioritised.

Innovation

This is the first time following the COVID-19 pandemic that medical student empathy was measured across all five years of a medical school. Unlike many previous related studies, we identified the point at which empathy appears to decline, providing guidance for educators who can target empathy enhancing interventions where they are most needed.

移情能力在医学教育的临床阶段会下降吗?对莱斯特医学院学生的研究
方法学生们在2022-2023学年完成了在线版杰斐逊移情量表(JSE-S)。结果同理心得分在医学院不同年级之间存在差异(P≤0.001),医学院临床前和临床阶段的同理心得分略有下降(平均差=1.82,P=0.025)。男生的同理心得分低于女生,平均同理心得分与专业兴趣之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异。作为良好临床护理的重要组成部分,应优先考虑在医学教育中采取干预措施以提高移情能力。创新这是 COVID-19 大流行后首次对医学院校五年级医学生的移情能力进行测量。与以往许多相关研究不同的是,我们确定了移情出现下降的时间点,为教育者提供了指导,使他们能够在最需要的地方有针对性地采取增强移情的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信