Patterns of individual differences in executive functions for preschoolers from low-income backgrounds: Associations with pre-academic skills

IF 3.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Brianna L. Devlin , Elyssa A. Geer , Jennifer K. Finders , Tracy M. Zehner , Robert J. Duncan , David J. Purpura , Sara A. Schmitt
{"title":"Patterns of individual differences in executive functions for preschoolers from low-income backgrounds: Associations with pre-academic skills","authors":"Brianna L. Devlin ,&nbsp;Elyssa A. Geer ,&nbsp;Jennifer K. Finders ,&nbsp;Tracy M. Zehner ,&nbsp;Robert J. Duncan ,&nbsp;David J. Purpura ,&nbsp;Sara A. Schmitt","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Primarily studying executive functions of children from low-income backgrounds in comparison to more affluent peers can promote a deficit perspective that they are uniformly lacking in skills. We used latent profile analysis to investigate patterns of heterogeneity in executive functions in a sample of 232 preschoolers (<em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 52.15 months, <em>SD</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 6.70 months; 50 % female; 34 % Latine, 31 % White, 10 % Asian, 7 % Black, 14 % Multiracial, and 4 % other) from low-income backgrounds in the Midwestern United States. Five executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, complex planning, and behavioral self-regulation) were used as indicators. We found evidence of four latent profiles including three profiles with consistently below average, above average, and high executive functions. A fourth discordant profile had high executive functions but below average behavioral self-regulation. We also estimated relations among executive function profiles and concurrent numeracy, vocabulary, and geometry; patterns of relations differed by pre-academic skill.</p></div><div><h3>Educational relevance and implications</h3><p>Primarily studying executive functions of children from low-income backgrounds in comparison to more affluent peers can promote a deficit perspective that they are uniformly lacking in skills. Using a statistical method that allowed us to explore sub-groups of children based on their executive function skills, we found evidence of four distinct sub-groups in a sample of preschoolers from low-income backgrounds. One sub-group scored high in executive functions but lower in incorporating them into gross motor behavior, which may be particularly important for early math. Results disrupt deficit perspectives and point to future areas of research for designing targeted and differentiated instruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024000918","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Primarily studying executive functions of children from low-income backgrounds in comparison to more affluent peers can promote a deficit perspective that they are uniformly lacking in skills. We used latent profile analysis to investigate patterns of heterogeneity in executive functions in a sample of 232 preschoolers (Mage = 52.15 months, SDage = 6.70 months; 50 % female; 34 % Latine, 31 % White, 10 % Asian, 7 % Black, 14 % Multiracial, and 4 % other) from low-income backgrounds in the Midwestern United States. Five executive functions (working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, complex planning, and behavioral self-regulation) were used as indicators. We found evidence of four latent profiles including three profiles with consistently below average, above average, and high executive functions. A fourth discordant profile had high executive functions but below average behavioral self-regulation. We also estimated relations among executive function profiles and concurrent numeracy, vocabulary, and geometry; patterns of relations differed by pre-academic skill.

Educational relevance and implications

Primarily studying executive functions of children from low-income backgrounds in comparison to more affluent peers can promote a deficit perspective that they are uniformly lacking in skills. Using a statistical method that allowed us to explore sub-groups of children based on their executive function skills, we found evidence of four distinct sub-groups in a sample of preschoolers from low-income backgrounds. One sub-group scored high in executive functions but lower in incorporating them into gross motor behavior, which may be particularly important for early math. Results disrupt deficit perspectives and point to future areas of research for designing targeted and differentiated instruction.

低收入背景学龄前儿童执行功能的个体差异模式:与学前技能的关联
主要研究低收入背景儿童与较富裕同龄儿童的执行功能对比,可能会助长一种赤字观点,即他们都缺乏技能。我们采用潜特征分析法研究了美国中西部地区 232 名低收入学龄前儿童(年龄:52.15 个月,平均年龄:6.70 个月;50% 为女性;34% 为拉丁裔,31% 为白人,10% 为亚裔,7% 为黑人,14% 为多种族,4% 为其他种族)执行功能的异质性模式。五项执行功能(工作记忆、抑制控制、认知灵活性、复杂计划和行为自我调节)被用作指标。我们发现了四种潜在特征,其中三种特征的执行功能持续低于平均水平、高于平均水平和较高。第四种不一致的情况是,执行功能较高,但行为自我调节能力低于平均水平。我们还估算了执行功能特征与同时出现的算术、词汇和几何之间的关系;这些关系的模式因学前技能的不同而不同。通过使用一种统计方法,我们可以根据儿童的执行功能技能对其进行分组研究,我们在低收入背景的学龄前儿童样本中发现了四个不同分组的证据。其中一个亚组的执行功能得分较高,但将执行功能融入粗大运动行为的能力较低,而粗大运动行为可能对早期数学学习尤为重要。研究结果颠覆了缺陷观点,并指出了设计有针对性和差异化教学的未来研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning and Individual Differences
Learning and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信