How do soil fauna mediate leaf litter decomposition in north temperate forest ecosystems?

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q3 ECOLOGY
James C. Burtis, Gwen T. Pipes, Joseph B. Yavitt
{"title":"How do soil fauna mediate leaf litter decomposition in north temperate forest ecosystems?","authors":"James C. Burtis,&nbsp;Gwen T. Pipes,&nbsp;Joseph B. Yavitt","doi":"10.1016/j.pedobi.2024.150975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigated how soil fauna impact leaf litter decomposition in north temperate forests using litter bags with different mesh sizes (5 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.01 mm) to exclude specific fauna by size. The experimental design included two regions (warmer, cooler) in New York State, two forest types (coniferous, deciduous), and litter bags with four tree species (yellow birch, sugar maple, red oak, red pine) that varied in litter resource quality. Excluding most soil fauna with 0.01-mm mesh decreased mass loss from litter bags by 8.8 % overall; by 19 % in the relatively warmer region; by 12 % in coniferous forest stands; and by 18 % for high-quality yellow birch litter but not for high-quality sugar maple litter or low-quality red oak and red pine litters. Mass loss rates were predicted by initial nitrogen concentrations and by initial ratios of carbon / nitrogen and lignin / nitrogen of the leaf litter; these relationships were stronger for litter bags that excluded soil fauna. Fauna extracted from the leaf litter residue were predominantly Acari (mites) and Collembola (springtails). Soil fauna mediated the extent that biochemical fractions (nitrogen, hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin) were lost from decomposing litter but in idiosyncratic ways. Not only are soil fauna impacts on leaf litter decomposition widespread, but, as shown here, they can be idiosyncratic when evaluated with several litter species that differ in resource quality, placed in different forest types, and across a climate gradient. Future analyses of soil fauna impacts on leaf litter decomposition should combine litter-, site-, and climate-related variability to improve understanding and enable prediction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49711,"journal":{"name":"Pedobiologia","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 150975"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031405624034966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated how soil fauna impact leaf litter decomposition in north temperate forests using litter bags with different mesh sizes (5 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.01 mm) to exclude specific fauna by size. The experimental design included two regions (warmer, cooler) in New York State, two forest types (coniferous, deciduous), and litter bags with four tree species (yellow birch, sugar maple, red oak, red pine) that varied in litter resource quality. Excluding most soil fauna with 0.01-mm mesh decreased mass loss from litter bags by 8.8 % overall; by 19 % in the relatively warmer region; by 12 % in coniferous forest stands; and by 18 % for high-quality yellow birch litter but not for high-quality sugar maple litter or low-quality red oak and red pine litters. Mass loss rates were predicted by initial nitrogen concentrations and by initial ratios of carbon / nitrogen and lignin / nitrogen of the leaf litter; these relationships were stronger for litter bags that excluded soil fauna. Fauna extracted from the leaf litter residue were predominantly Acari (mites) and Collembola (springtails). Soil fauna mediated the extent that biochemical fractions (nitrogen, hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin) were lost from decomposing litter but in idiosyncratic ways. Not only are soil fauna impacts on leaf litter decomposition widespread, but, as shown here, they can be idiosyncratic when evaluated with several litter species that differ in resource quality, placed in different forest types, and across a climate gradient. Future analyses of soil fauna impacts on leaf litter decomposition should combine litter-, site-, and climate-related variability to improve understanding and enable prediction.

土壤动物如何介导北温带森林生态系统中的落叶分解?
我们使用不同网眼尺寸(5 毫米、0.5 毫米和 0.01 毫米)的垃圾袋来研究土壤动物如何影响北温带森林的落叶分解,从而按尺寸排除特定的动物。实验设计包括纽约州的两个地区(温暖地区和凉爽地区)、两种森林类型(针叶林和落叶林)以及装有四种树种(黄桦树、糖槭树、红橡树和红松)的垃圾袋,这些树种的垃圾资源质量各不相同。用 0.01 毫米的网眼排除大部分土壤动物后,垃圾袋的质量损失总体减少了 8.8%;在相对温暖的地区减少了 19%;在针叶林中减少了 12%;优质黄桦垃圾袋的质量损失减少了 18%,但优质糖槭垃圾袋或低质量红栎和红松垃圾袋的质量损失没有减少。质量损失率是由落叶的初始氮浓度以及碳/氮和木质素/氮的初始比率预测的;这些关系在不包括土壤动物的落叶袋中更为明显。从残留落叶中提取的动物主要是螨类和鞘翅目。土壤动物对腐烂落叶中生化组分(氮、半纤维素、纤维素、木质素)的损失程度起着介导作用,但方式各不相同。土壤动物对枯落叶分解的影响不仅广泛存在,而且正如本文所示,当评估资源质量不同的几种枯落叶物种、不同的森林类型以及不同的气候梯度时,它们的影响也会各不相同。未来分析土壤动物对落叶分解的影响时,应将落叶、地点和气候相关的变异性结合起来,以加深理解并进行预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pedobiologia
Pedobiologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Pedobiologia publishes peer reviewed articles describing original work in the field of soil ecology, which includes the study of soil organisms and their interactions with factors in their biotic and abiotic environments. Analysis of biological structures, interactions, functions, and processes in soil is fundamental for understanding the dynamical nature of terrestrial ecosystems, a prerequisite for appropriate soil management. The scope of this journal consists of fundamental and applied aspects of soil ecology; key focal points include interactions among organisms in soil, organismal controls on soil processes, causes and consequences of soil biodiversity, and aboveground-belowground interactions. We publish: original research that tests clearly defined hypotheses addressing topics of current interest in soil ecology (including studies demonstrating nonsignificant effects); descriptions of novel methodological approaches, or evaluations of current approaches, that address a clear need in soil ecology research; innovative syntheses of the soil ecology literature, including metaanalyses, topical in depth reviews and short opinion/perspective pieces, and descriptions of original conceptual frameworks; and short notes reporting novel observations of ecological significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信