Low-dose atropine for high myopia: An observational cohort study

Anna Mueller , Roberto Warman
{"title":"Low-dose atropine for high myopia: An observational cohort study","authors":"Anna Mueller ,&nbsp;Roberto Warman","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To describe and compare the spherical equivalent progression of pediatric patients with high myopia undergoing treatment with 0.01 % atropine and those not receiving any myopia therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Retrospective, descriptive cohort study</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this IRB-approved study, we analyzed the spherical equivalent (SE) progression in children 6–13 years old treated with 0.01 % atropine and those who were not treated for myopia, initial SE of ≤-6 D, astigmatism of ≤2 D, no syndromic conditions, and records of cycloplegic refraction measurements without missing more than one year.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-five eyes were included, with 87 % belonging to Hispanic patients. The baseline SE (D) was -7.66 ± 1.40 in the atropine group and -7.90 ± 1.38 in the control group. Over three years, atropine-treated eyes demonstrated slower SE progression compared to controls (<em>P</em> = 0.002). Analysis of yearly progression rates (D/year) revealed notably slower progression in the atropine group during the second (<em>P</em> = 0.04) and third (<em>P</em> = 0.02) years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that low-dose atropine may be beneficial as a first-line treatment for high myopia due to its favorable safety profile and potential efficacy. Due to limited statistical power, findings should be interpreted cautiously.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000467/pdfft?md5=5f7709c3e439015737541be0912f71f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To describe and compare the spherical equivalent progression of pediatric patients with high myopia undergoing treatment with 0.01 % atropine and those not receiving any myopia therapy.

Design

Retrospective, descriptive cohort study

Methods

In this IRB-approved study, we analyzed the spherical equivalent (SE) progression in children 6–13 years old treated with 0.01 % atropine and those who were not treated for myopia, initial SE of ≤-6 D, astigmatism of ≤2 D, no syndromic conditions, and records of cycloplegic refraction measurements without missing more than one year.

Results

Seventy-five eyes were included, with 87 % belonging to Hispanic patients. The baseline SE (D) was -7.66 ± 1.40 in the atropine group and -7.90 ± 1.38 in the control group. Over three years, atropine-treated eyes demonstrated slower SE progression compared to controls (P = 0.002). Analysis of yearly progression rates (D/year) revealed notably slower progression in the atropine group during the second (P = 0.04) and third (P = 0.02) years.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that low-dose atropine may be beneficial as a first-line treatment for high myopia due to its favorable safety profile and potential efficacy. Due to limited statistical power, findings should be interpreted cautiously.

小剂量阿托品治疗高度近视:一项观察性队列研究
目的描述并比较接受 0.01 % 阿托品治疗和未接受任何近视治疗的儿童高度近视患者的球面等效度数进展情况。结果共纳入 75 只眼睛,其中 87% 属于西班牙裔患者。阿托品组的基线 SE (D) 为 -7.66 ± 1.40,对照组为 -7.90 ± 1.38。与对照组相比,经过阿托品治疗的眼睛在三年内的SE进展较慢(P = 0.002)。我们的研究结果表明,小剂量阿托品具有良好的安全性和潜在疗效,可作为高度近视的一线治疗手段。由于统计能力有限,应谨慎解释研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信