Contribution of the root system of Cyperus papyrus and Pontederia sagittata to microplastic removal in floating treatment Wetlands in two urban ponds

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
María del Refugio Cabañas-Mendoza , Eugenia J. Olguín , Gloria Sánchez-Galván , Francisco J. Melo , María Susana Alvarado Barrientos
{"title":"Contribution of the root system of Cyperus papyrus and Pontederia sagittata to microplastic removal in floating treatment Wetlands in two urban ponds","authors":"María del Refugio Cabañas-Mendoza ,&nbsp;Eugenia J. Olguín ,&nbsp;Gloria Sánchez-Galván ,&nbsp;Francisco J. Melo ,&nbsp;María Susana Alvarado Barrientos","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Microplastic pollution represents a global challenge that threatens ecosystems and human health. Because of this, there has been an increased interest in evaluating the use of phytotechnologies as a natural alternative for the removal of microplastics in water bodies. This study assessed the microplastic removal by Floating Treatment Wetlands (FTWs) consisting of linear arrays planted with <em>Cyperus papyrus</em> and <em>Pontederia sagittata</em>, installed in two urban ponds (“Pond 1” and “Pond 4”) located in the center of the city of Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. The results indicated that the two linear arrays of FTWs in Pond 1 (FTW1 and FTW2) efficiently removed microplastics in water column and sediments, with total removal rates of 82.4% and 81.1% respectively, despite having a high initial microplastic concentration. On the other hand, the effectiveness of the two FTWs in Pond 4 was mainly attributed to the first line of plants (FTW3), where the highest removal rates were observed, showing 61.6% in water column and 72.6% in sediments. However, the total removal of the two lines was 64.6% in water and 48.8% in sediments. <em>C. papyrus</em> and <em>P. sagittata</em> plants strongly retained microplastics in their roots, with concentrations of 16.4 and 11.9 mg/g respectively for FTW1 and FTW2 in Pond 1, and 2.1 and 6 mg/g for FTW3 and FTW 4 in Pond 4. These results suggest that the main removal microplastic mechanism was root retention, which facilitates microplastic removal from the aquatic environment by periodical root harvesting. Therefore, the crucial role of roots in the stabilization and reduction of these pollutants is highlighted. This study represents the first report in Mexico on the efficiency of FTWs in removing microplastics in urban water bodies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857424001599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microplastic pollution represents a global challenge that threatens ecosystems and human health. Because of this, there has been an increased interest in evaluating the use of phytotechnologies as a natural alternative for the removal of microplastics in water bodies. This study assessed the microplastic removal by Floating Treatment Wetlands (FTWs) consisting of linear arrays planted with Cyperus papyrus and Pontederia sagittata, installed in two urban ponds (“Pond 1” and “Pond 4”) located in the center of the city of Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. The results indicated that the two linear arrays of FTWs in Pond 1 (FTW1 and FTW2) efficiently removed microplastics in water column and sediments, with total removal rates of 82.4% and 81.1% respectively, despite having a high initial microplastic concentration. On the other hand, the effectiveness of the two FTWs in Pond 4 was mainly attributed to the first line of plants (FTW3), where the highest removal rates were observed, showing 61.6% in water column and 72.6% in sediments. However, the total removal of the two lines was 64.6% in water and 48.8% in sediments. C. papyrus and P. sagittata plants strongly retained microplastics in their roots, with concentrations of 16.4 and 11.9 mg/g respectively for FTW1 and FTW2 in Pond 1, and 2.1 and 6 mg/g for FTW3 and FTW 4 in Pond 4. These results suggest that the main removal microplastic mechanism was root retention, which facilitates microplastic removal from the aquatic environment by periodical root harvesting. Therefore, the crucial role of roots in the stabilization and reduction of these pollutants is highlighted. This study represents the first report in Mexico on the efficiency of FTWs in removing microplastics in urban water bodies.

Abstract Image

两个城市池塘中的浮动处理湿地中,纸莎草和鹅掌楸根系对去除微塑料的贡献
微塑料污染是威胁生态系统和人类健康的全球性挑战。因此,人们越来越关注评估植物技术的使用情况,将其作为清除水体中微塑料的天然替代方法。本研究评估了浮动处理湿地(FTWs)去除微塑料的情况,该湿地由种植了纸莎草和箭竹的线性阵列组成,安装在位于墨西哥韦拉克鲁斯州哈拉帕市中心的两个城市池塘("池塘 1 "和 "池塘 4")中。结果表明,尽管池塘 1 的初始微塑料浓度较高,但池塘 1 中的两个线性阵列(FTW1 和 FTW2)能有效去除水体和沉积物中的微塑料,总去除率分别为 82.4% 和 81.1%。另一方面,第 4 号池塘中的两种 FTW 的效果主要归功于第一种植物(FTW3),其去除率最高,在水体中的去除率为 61.6%,在沉积物中的去除率为 72.6%。然而,两个品系的总去除率分别为水体中 64.6%,沉积物中 48.8%。C. 纸莎草和 P. sagittata 植物的根部强烈保留了微塑料,池塘 1 中的 FTW1 和 FTW2 浓度分别为 16.4 和 11.9 毫克/克,池塘 4 中的 FTW3 和 FTW4 浓度分别为 2.1 和 6 毫克/克。这些结果表明,去除微塑料的主要机制是根系滞留,通过定期收割根系促进微塑料从水环境中去除。因此,根系在稳定和减少这些污染物方面的关键作用得到了强调。这项研究是墨西哥第一份关于 FTW 在城市水体中去除微塑料效率的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信