{"title":"Unfairness brings malice: Malevolent creativity is modulated by perceived unfairness of others","authors":"Wenyu Zhang , Qiuyu Liang , Xinuo Qiao , Ning Hao","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Creativity which is driven by negative intention can be termed as malevolent creativity (MC). Existing findings revealed that unfairness promoted regular antisocial behavior like aggression or lying. But the relationship between unfairness and creative antisocial behavior (i.e., MC) have not been investigated. Based on AMORAL theory, two studies were conducted to investigate the relationship between unfairness and MC from trait and state levels respectively. In Study 1, participants completed several questionaries about unfairness, MC, and other personality traits in online formats. Results showed that MC was significantly correlated with individuals’ unfairness, aggression, and moral disengagement. Aggression and moral disengagement played mediating roles between unfairness and MC. In Study 2, the Ultimatum Game paradigm was used to activate participants’ feelings of unfairness and they were further asked to solve MC problems in control or unfair conditions. Results showed that the experience of unfair condition enhanced individuals’ MC performance. Anger and implicit aggression played mediating roles between unfairness and MC. These findings indicate that individuals’ MC performance might be enhanced by unfairness and this effect could be related to individuals’ moral disengagement, aggression and anger.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47729,"journal":{"name":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101586"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187118712400124X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Creativity which is driven by negative intention can be termed as malevolent creativity (MC). Existing findings revealed that unfairness promoted regular antisocial behavior like aggression or lying. But the relationship between unfairness and creative antisocial behavior (i.e., MC) have not been investigated. Based on AMORAL theory, two studies were conducted to investigate the relationship between unfairness and MC from trait and state levels respectively. In Study 1, participants completed several questionaries about unfairness, MC, and other personality traits in online formats. Results showed that MC was significantly correlated with individuals’ unfairness, aggression, and moral disengagement. Aggression and moral disengagement played mediating roles between unfairness and MC. In Study 2, the Ultimatum Game paradigm was used to activate participants’ feelings of unfairness and they were further asked to solve MC problems in control or unfair conditions. Results showed that the experience of unfair condition enhanced individuals’ MC performance. Anger and implicit aggression played mediating roles between unfairness and MC. These findings indicate that individuals’ MC performance might be enhanced by unfairness and this effect could be related to individuals’ moral disengagement, aggression and anger.
由负面意图驱动的创造力可称为恶意创造力(MC)。现有研究结果表明,不公平会促进常规的反社会行为,如攻击或撒谎。但不公平与创造性反社会行为(即 MC)之间的关系尚未得到研究。基于 AMORAL 理论,我们进行了两项研究,分别从特质和状态两个层面探讨不公平与 MC 之间的关系。在研究 1 中,受试者通过在线形式完成了几份关于不公平感、MC 及其他人格特质的问卷。结果表明,MC 与个体的不公平感、攻击性和道德疏离感有明显的相关性。攻击性和道德脱离在不公平感和 MC 之间起到了中介作用。在研究2中,研究人员使用了 "最后通牒游戏 "范式来激活参与者的不公平感,并进一步要求他们在控制或不公平条件下解决MC问题。结果表明,不公平条件的体验会提高个体的 MC 表现。愤怒和内隐攻击在不公平感和 MC 之间起到了中介作用。这些研究结果表明,个体的 MC 表现可能会因为不公平而提高,而这种效应可能与个体的道德偏离、攻击性和愤怒有关。
期刊介绍:
Thinking Skills and Creativity is a new journal providing a peer-reviewed forum for communication and debate for the community of researchers interested in teaching for thinking and creativity. Papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches and may relate to any age level in a diversity of settings: formal and informal, education and work-based.