Does uncertainty affect the limits of arbitrage? Evidence from the U.S. stock markets

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Weihua Chen , Rogemar Mamon , Heng Xiong , Pingping Zeng
{"title":"Does uncertainty affect the limits of arbitrage? Evidence from the U.S. stock markets","authors":"Weihua Chen ,&nbsp;Rogemar Mamon ,&nbsp;Heng Xiong ,&nbsp;Pingping Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyzes how uncertainty affects the correction process of mispricing. We extract stock market data from the United States spanning from January 1976 to December 2016, and discover that uncertainty exerts a notable impact on traders’ decision-making processes. Various robustness tests have been conducted to validate the credibility of our findings. Notably, the extension of the sample duration until December 2022, encompassing the disruptive COVID-19 pandemic, serves to fortify the cohesion and reliability of our primary analysis, with the findings exhibiting consistency. Additionally, we examine how investor sentiment affects future returns under different uncertainty and overpricing ranks. An inverse relation between investor sentiment and uncertainty is also detected. We contribute to the existing literature by revealing potential features that affect the limits of arbitrage. Our results provide insights in designing arbitrage mechanisms and assist arbitrageurs in strategizing their operations with stocks under different magnitudes of uncertainty.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940824001463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes how uncertainty affects the correction process of mispricing. We extract stock market data from the United States spanning from January 1976 to December 2016, and discover that uncertainty exerts a notable impact on traders’ decision-making processes. Various robustness tests have been conducted to validate the credibility of our findings. Notably, the extension of the sample duration until December 2022, encompassing the disruptive COVID-19 pandemic, serves to fortify the cohesion and reliability of our primary analysis, with the findings exhibiting consistency. Additionally, we examine how investor sentiment affects future returns under different uncertainty and overpricing ranks. An inverse relation between investor sentiment and uncertainty is also detected. We contribute to the existing literature by revealing potential features that affect the limits of arbitrage. Our results provide insights in designing arbitrage mechanisms and assist arbitrageurs in strategizing their operations with stocks under different magnitudes of uncertainty.

不确定性会影响套利的限度吗?来自美国股市的证据
本研究分析了不确定性如何影响错误定价的修正过程。我们提取了美国从 1976 年 1 月到 2016 年 12 月的股票市场数据,发现不确定性对交易者的决策过程产生了显著影响。我们还进行了各种稳健性检验,以验证我们研究结果的可信度。值得注意的是,我们将样本时间延长至 2022 年 12 月,其中包括具有破坏性的 COVID-19 大流行,这有助于加强我们主要分析的凝聚力和可靠性,并使我们的研究结果呈现出一致性。此外,我们还研究了在不同的不确定性和定价过高等级下,投资者情绪如何影响未来回报。我们还发现了投资者情绪与不确定性之间的反向关系。我们揭示了影响套利限制的潜在特征,为现有文献做出了贡献。我们的研究结果为设计套利机制提供了启示,并有助于套利者在不同的不确定性下制定股票操作策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信