A Fullerton Functional Fitness Test-based exercise intervention for older adults yields quick physical and psychological benefits

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Eliza E. Toth , Aleksandar Vujić , Ferenc Ihász , Roberto Ruíz-Barquín , Attila Szabo
{"title":"A Fullerton Functional Fitness Test-based exercise intervention for older adults yields quick physical and psychological benefits","authors":"Eliza E. Toth ,&nbsp;Aleksandar Vujić ,&nbsp;Ferenc Ihász ,&nbsp;Roberto Ruíz-Barquín ,&nbsp;Attila Szabo","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Functional fitness is essential for healthy living in older adults. Specially targeted fitness programs might be the most beneficial. This intervention study aimed to assess the efficacy of a specific 16-week exercise program in improving functions as measured by the Fullerton Functional Fitness Test (FFFT), also known as the Senior Test, in older adults.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Thirty-eight participants (66 % women, M<sub>age</sub> = 80.15, SD = 7.21) were randomized into an exercise group (n = 24) and a waiting list control group (n = 14). The exercise group trained three times a week for 1 h.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Objective tests (FFFT and handgrip power) and subjective psychological measures (life satisfaction, resilience, happiness, perceived stress, and well-being) were obtained at baseline, after eight weeks, and after 16 weeks. The data were analyzed using mixed-effect regression models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results yielded statistically significant group-by-time interactions in all models, indicating improvements in physical and psychological measures over time in the treatment group compared to the control group. Significant differences between the groups in the estimated marginal means (with adjusted 95 % confidence intervals) emerged after 16 weeks in happiness (−3.5 [-6.5, −0.4]), resilience (−5.5 [-9.9, −1.2]), perceived stress (2.2 [0.2, 4.2]), well-being (−5.8 [-7.9, −3.6]), upper limb strength (−5.7 [-9.0, −2.4]), upper body flexibility (−8.7 [-16.4, −1.0]), and agility and balance (4.6 [1.2, 8.1]). Except for happiness and resilience, these differences surfaced already after eight weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The here-employed 16-week exercise program, targeting the test elements of the FFFT, efficiently induced physical and mental improvements in older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101880"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000537/pdfft?md5=5dcde1065ce0a6467ddaea07a65093e5&pid=1-s2.0-S1744388124000537-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Functional fitness is essential for healthy living in older adults. Specially targeted fitness programs might be the most beneficial. This intervention study aimed to assess the efficacy of a specific 16-week exercise program in improving functions as measured by the Fullerton Functional Fitness Test (FFFT), also known as the Senior Test, in older adults.

Participants

Thirty-eight participants (66 % women, Mage = 80.15, SD = 7.21) were randomized into an exercise group (n = 24) and a waiting list control group (n = 14). The exercise group trained three times a week for 1 h.

Methods

Objective tests (FFFT and handgrip power) and subjective psychological measures (life satisfaction, resilience, happiness, perceived stress, and well-being) were obtained at baseline, after eight weeks, and after 16 weeks. The data were analyzed using mixed-effect regression models.

Results

The results yielded statistically significant group-by-time interactions in all models, indicating improvements in physical and psychological measures over time in the treatment group compared to the control group. Significant differences between the groups in the estimated marginal means (with adjusted 95 % confidence intervals) emerged after 16 weeks in happiness (−3.5 [-6.5, −0.4]), resilience (−5.5 [-9.9, −1.2]), perceived stress (2.2 [0.2, 4.2]), well-being (−5.8 [-7.9, −3.6]), upper limb strength (−5.7 [-9.0, −2.4]), upper body flexibility (−8.7 [-16.4, −1.0]), and agility and balance (4.6 [1.2, 8.1]). Except for happiness and resilience, these differences surfaced already after eight weeks.

Conclusion

The here-employed 16-week exercise program, targeting the test elements of the FFFT, efficiently induced physical and mental improvements in older adults.

以富勒顿功能体能测试为基础的老年人运动干预能迅速产生生理和心理益处。
目的:功能性健身对老年人的健康生活至关重要。有针对性的健身计划可能最有益。这项干预研究旨在评估一项为期 16 周的特定锻炼计划在改善老年人功能方面的效果,该计划通过富勒顿功能体能测试(Fullerton Functional Fitness Test,FFFT)(也称为老年测试)来衡量:38 名参与者(66% 为女性,平均年龄 = 80.15,标准差 = 7.21)被随机分为运动组(n = 24)和候补对照组(n = 14)。运动组每周训练三次,每次 1 小时:分别在基线期、8 周后和 16 周后进行客观测试(FFFT 和握力)和主观心理测量(生活满意度、复原力、幸福感、感知压力和幸福感)。数据采用混合效应回归模型进行分析:结果:在所有模型中,组与组之间的时间交互作用都具有统计学意义,表明随着时间的推移,治疗组与对照组相比在生理和心理测量方面都有所改善。16 周后,治疗组与对照组在幸福感(-3.5 [-6.5, -0.4])、恢复力(-5.5 [-9.9, -1.2])、感知压力(2.2 [0.2,4.2])、幸福感(-5.8 [-7.9,-3.6])、上肢力量(-5.7 [-9.0,-2.4])、上身灵活性(-8.7 [-16.4,-1.0])以及敏捷性和平衡性(4.6 [1.2,8.1])。除了幸福感和恢复力之外,这些差异在八周后已经显现出来:结论:针对 FFFT 测试要素的为期 16 周的锻炼计划能有效改善老年人的身体和精神状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信