The effect of a hybrid structured pulmonary rehabilitation education program for patients with lung cancer with a high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: A quasi-experimental study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yan Liang , Ting Deng , Yangyang Long , Jin Li , Jinfen Yang , Yufan Hu , Taiping Lu , Xu Luo , Lorna Kwai Ping Suen , Shaolin Chen
{"title":"The effect of a hybrid structured pulmonary rehabilitation education program for patients with lung cancer with a high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: A quasi-experimental study","authors":"Yan Liang ,&nbsp;Ting Deng ,&nbsp;Yangyang Long ,&nbsp;Jin Li ,&nbsp;Jinfen Yang ,&nbsp;Yufan Hu ,&nbsp;Taiping Lu ,&nbsp;Xu Luo ,&nbsp;Lorna Kwai Ping Suen ,&nbsp;Shaolin Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The absence of standardized protocols and education are the main obstacles to perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), especially for patients with high-risk factors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). We aimed to explore the effect of a hybrid structured pulmonary rehabilitation education program (SPREP) on patients with lung cancer at high risk of PPCs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A quasi-experimental trial with a pre-post test design was conducted. The control group (n = 53) adopted routine perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation, while the intervention group (n = 53) received SPREP. Respiratory function, 6-min walk distance, Borg dyspnea scale, quality of life, anxiety–depression scores at admission, discharge, 2 weeks and 3 months post-discharge, and incidence of PPCs were compared between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences on the 6-min walk distance and Borg Dyspnoea Scale at discharge between the two groups (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05), whereas the intervention group showed improved performance at the remaining time points (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). In addition, the intervention group had improved exercise capacity, pulmonary function and quality of life, reduced levels of anxiety and depression at discharge, 2 weeks post-discharge and 3 months post-discharge (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). In addition, incidence of PPCs was significantly reduced in the intervention group, especially postoperative pneumonia.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The SPREP could show significant benefits in enhancing exercise capacity, lung function, and quality of life, while diminishing the occurrence of PPCs and mitigating the levels of anxiety and depression, future large RCT need to further explore the efficacy.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>This study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR) under the Clinical Trial Registration Number [ChiCTR2200066698].</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 102655"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388924001534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The absence of standardized protocols and education are the main obstacles to perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), especially for patients with high-risk factors of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). We aimed to explore the effect of a hybrid structured pulmonary rehabilitation education program (SPREP) on patients with lung cancer at high risk of PPCs.

Methods

A quasi-experimental trial with a pre-post test design was conducted. The control group (n = 53) adopted routine perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation, while the intervention group (n = 53) received SPREP. Respiratory function, 6-min walk distance, Borg dyspnea scale, quality of life, anxiety–depression scores at admission, discharge, 2 weeks and 3 months post-discharge, and incidence of PPCs were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences on the 6-min walk distance and Borg Dyspnoea Scale at discharge between the two groups (P > 0.05), whereas the intervention group showed improved performance at the remaining time points (P < 0.05). In addition, the intervention group had improved exercise capacity, pulmonary function and quality of life, reduced levels of anxiety and depression at discharge, 2 weeks post-discharge and 3 months post-discharge (P < 0.05). In addition, incidence of PPCs was significantly reduced in the intervention group, especially postoperative pneumonia.

Conclusions

The SPREP could show significant benefits in enhancing exercise capacity, lung function, and quality of life, while diminishing the occurrence of PPCs and mitigating the levels of anxiety and depression, future large RCT need to further explore the efficacy.

Trial registration

This study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR) under the Clinical Trial Registration Number [ChiCTR2200066698].

针对术后肺部并发症高风险肺癌患者的混合结构肺康复教育计划的效果:准实验研究。
目的:缺乏标准化的方案和教育是围手术期肺康复(PR)的主要障碍,尤其是对于具有术后肺部并发症(PPCs)高风险因素的患者。我们旨在探讨混合结构化肺康复教育计划(SPREP)对肺癌术后并发症高危患者的影响:方法:我们进行了一项采用前后测试设计的准实验性试验。对照组(53 人)采用常规围手术期肺康复治疗,干预组(53 人)接受 SPREP 治疗。比较两组患者在入院、出院、出院后 2 周和 3 个月的呼吸功能、6 分钟步行距离、博格呼吸困难量表、生活质量、焦虑抑郁评分以及 PPCs 发生率:结果:两组患者出院时的 6 分钟步行距离和博格呼吸困难量表无明显差异(P > 0.05),而干预组患者在其余时间点的表现均有所改善(P 结论:SPREP 可为患者带来明显的益处:SPREP在提高运动能力、肺功能和生活质量方面有显著疗效,同时减少了PPCs的发生,减轻了焦虑和抑郁水平,未来的大型RCT需要进一步探讨其疗效:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR)注册,临床试验注册号为[ChiCTR2200066698]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信