The Effect of Different Education Methods Before Invasive Urodynamics on Patients’ Anxiety, Pain, Readiness and Satisfaction Levels: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Abstract

Background

Urodynamic testing is an invasive procedure that causes pain and anxiety. Patient education is an evidence-based nursing intervention that relieves pain and anxiety and increases patient satisfaction.

Aims

This study was carried out to compare the effects of different education methods utilized before a urodynamic testing procedure on patients’ pain, anxiety, readiness for the procedure, and satisfaction.

Methods

The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants (n = 80) were randomly assigned to four groups. While patients in the control group were provided with routine clinical information, patients in the intervention group were given education with brochures, videos, and brochure-supported videos. The research data were collected by using a Data Collection Form with items about participants’ descriptive characteristics, the Visual Analog Scale, and the State Anxiety Inventory.

Results

It was determined that pain expectation before urodynamics and the severity of pain during urodynamics were lower in intervention groups than in the control group. Pain expectation before urodynamics was lower in the brochure-supported video education group than in the brochure education group. Anxiety levels were lower and satisfaction levels were higher in the video education and brochure-supported video education groups than in the control and brochure education groups.

Conclusions

Of the methods utilized, it was determined that the most effective one was brochure-supported video education as it affected all parameters positively.