Efficacy and safety of different pharmacological interventions in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1007/s00228-024-03722-5
Omar Ismail, Karam Albdour, Yazan Jaber, Kamel Jaber, Ameen Alsaras
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of different pharmacological interventions in the treatment of tardive dyskinesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Omar Ismail, Karam Albdour, Yazan Jaber, Kamel Jaber, Ameen Alsaras","doi":"10.1007/s00228-024-03722-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to indirectly compare and rank the different drugs that have been studied in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with tardive dyskinesia (TD) in terms of their efficacy in ameliorating the symptoms of TD and safety.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A network meta-analysis and a systematic review were registered prospectively on PROSPERO under the ID: CRD42023407823 and were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-NMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Sciences, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched to identify relevant records.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: </strong>Any parallel randomized blinded controlled clinical trials that studied the use of any medications in treating TD and assessed the symptoms using a functional scale that has been previously validated.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>The standardized mean difference of improvement along with the reported adverse events for each drug was extracted from each trial, and a network meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand eight hundred seventeen patients in 33 RCTs were included in the analysis. Twenty-three different drugs were compared to placebo in terms of reduction in TD symptoms. Among these, valbenazine 80 mg (SMD =  - 1.66, 95%CI = [- 2.55; - 0.78]), valbenazine 40 mg (- 1.00, [- 1.89; - 0.11]), and vitamin E (- 0.77, [- 1.45; - 0.1]) significantly reduced TD symptoms in comparison to placebo, while deutetrabenazine 36 mg (- 1.00, [- 2.12; 0.11]) and reserpine (- 0.54, [- 1.09; 0.02]) did not significantly reduce symptoms. Some serious adverse events were reported for valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, which included mainly psychiatric symptoms such as depression, worsening of schizophrenia, and suicidal ideation, while mild adverse events were reported for other drugs, and their incidence in the treatment arms was comparable to those in the placebo arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Valbenazine (80 and 40 mg) and vitamin E demonstrated efficacy in treating tardive dyskinesia. However, the significant side effects of valbenazine should prompt further investigation of alternative treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-024-03722-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to indirectly compare and rank the different drugs that have been studied in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with tardive dyskinesia (TD) in terms of their efficacy in ameliorating the symptoms of TD and safety.

Design: A network meta-analysis and a systematic review were registered prospectively on PROSPERO under the ID: CRD42023407823 and were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-NMA guidelines.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Sciences, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched to identify relevant records.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Any parallel randomized blinded controlled clinical trials that studied the use of any medications in treating TD and assessed the symptoms using a functional scale that has been previously validated.

Data extraction: The standardized mean difference of improvement along with the reported adverse events for each drug was extracted from each trial, and a network meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

Results: One thousand eight hundred seventeen patients in 33 RCTs were included in the analysis. Twenty-three different drugs were compared to placebo in terms of reduction in TD symptoms. Among these, valbenazine 80 mg (SMD =  - 1.66, 95%CI = [- 2.55; - 0.78]), valbenazine 40 mg (- 1.00, [- 1.89; - 0.11]), and vitamin E (- 0.77, [- 1.45; - 0.1]) significantly reduced TD symptoms in comparison to placebo, while deutetrabenazine 36 mg (- 1.00, [- 2.12; 0.11]) and reserpine (- 0.54, [- 1.09; 0.02]) did not significantly reduce symptoms. Some serious adverse events were reported for valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, which included mainly psychiatric symptoms such as depression, worsening of schizophrenia, and suicidal ideation, while mild adverse events were reported for other drugs, and their incidence in the treatment arms was comparable to those in the placebo arm.

Conclusions: Valbenazine (80 and 40 mg) and vitamin E demonstrated efficacy in treating tardive dyskinesia. However, the significant side effects of valbenazine should prompt further investigation of alternative treatment modalities.

Abstract Image

不同药物干预治疗迟发性运动障碍的有效性和安全性:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
研究目的本研究旨在对随机临床试验(RCT)中针对迟发性运动障碍(TD)患者的不同药物在改善TD症状方面的疗效和安全性进行间接比较和排序:网络荟萃分析和系统综述在 PROSPERO 上进行了前瞻性登记,登记号为 CRD42023407823,并按照 PRISMA-NMA 指南进行:对 PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane 对照试验中央注册中心 (CENTRAL)、Web of Sciences 和 Clinicaltrials.gov 进行了检索,以确定相关记录:任何平行随机盲法对照临床试验,研究使用任何药物治疗 TD,并使用先前已验证的功能量表评估症状:从每项试验中提取每种药物的标准化平均改善差异和报告的不良事件,并使用随机效应模型进行网络荟萃分析:33项研究中的1817名患者被纳入分析。在减少 TD 症状方面,有 23 种不同的药物与安慰剂进行了比较。其中,缬苯嗪 80 毫克(SMD = - 1.66,95%CI = [- 2.55; - 0.78])、缬苯嗪 40 毫克(- 1.00,[- 1.89; - 0.11])和维生素 E(- 0.77,[- 1.45; - 0.1])与安慰剂相比可明显减轻 TD 症状,而去甲替拉嗪 36 毫克(- 1.00,[- 2.12; 0.11])和利血平(- 0.54,[- 1.09; 0.02])则不能明显减轻症状。缬苯嗪和去甲替拉嗪出现了一些严重的不良反应,主要包括抑郁、精神分裂症恶化和自杀意念等精神症状,而其他药物则出现了轻微的不良反应,其在治疗组的发生率与安慰剂组相当:结论:戊苯丙嗪(80 毫克和 40 毫克)和维生素 E 对治疗迟发性运动障碍具有疗效。结论:缬苯嗪(80 毫克和 40 毫克)和维生素 E 对治疗迟发性运动障碍有疗效,但缬苯嗪的副作用较大,应进一步研究其他治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信