Individualized time windows enhance TMS-EEG signal characterization and improve assessment of cortical function in schizophrenia.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gema Mijancos-Martínez, Alejandro Bachiller, Inés Fernández-Linsenbarth, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Vicente Molina, Miguel Ángel Mañanas
{"title":"Individualized time windows enhance TMS-EEG signal characterization and improve assessment of cortical function in schizophrenia.","authors":"Gema Mijancos-Martínez, Alejandro Bachiller, Inés Fernández-Linsenbarth, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Vicente Molina, Miguel Ángel Mañanas","doi":"10.1007/s00406-024-01859-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) recordings are crucial to directly assess cortical excitability and inhibition in a non-invasive and task-free manner. TMS-EEG signals are characterized by TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), which are employed to evaluate cortical function. Nonetheless, different time windows (TW) have been used to compute them over the years. Moreover, these TWs tend to be the same for all participants omitting the intersubject variability. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the effect of using different TWs to compute the TEPs, moving from a common fixed TW to more adaptive individualized TWs. Twenty-nine healthy (HC) controls and twenty schizophrenia patients (SCZ) underwent single-pulse (SP) TMS-EEG protocol. Firstly, only the HC were considered to evaluate the TEPs for three different TWs in terms of amplitude and topographical distribution. Secondly, the SCZ patients were included to determine which TW is better to characterize the brain alterations of SCZ. The results indicate that a more individualized TW provides a better characterization of the SP TMS-EEG signals, although all of them show the same tendency. Regarding the comparison between groups, the individualized TW is the one that provides a better differentiation between populations. They also provide further support to the possible imbalance of cortical excitability/inhibition in the SCZ population due to its reduced activity in the N45 TEP and greater amplitude values in the N100. Results also suggest that the SCZ brain has a baseline hyperactive state since the TEPs of the SCZ appear earlier than those of the HC.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01859-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) recordings are crucial to directly assess cortical excitability and inhibition in a non-invasive and task-free manner. TMS-EEG signals are characterized by TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), which are employed to evaluate cortical function. Nonetheless, different time windows (TW) have been used to compute them over the years. Moreover, these TWs tend to be the same for all participants omitting the intersubject variability. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the effect of using different TWs to compute the TEPs, moving from a common fixed TW to more adaptive individualized TWs. Twenty-nine healthy (HC) controls and twenty schizophrenia patients (SCZ) underwent single-pulse (SP) TMS-EEG protocol. Firstly, only the HC were considered to evaluate the TEPs for three different TWs in terms of amplitude and topographical distribution. Secondly, the SCZ patients were included to determine which TW is better to characterize the brain alterations of SCZ. The results indicate that a more individualized TW provides a better characterization of the SP TMS-EEG signals, although all of them show the same tendency. Regarding the comparison between groups, the individualized TW is the one that provides a better differentiation between populations. They also provide further support to the possible imbalance of cortical excitability/inhibition in the SCZ population due to its reduced activity in the N45 TEP and greater amplitude values in the N100. Results also suggest that the SCZ brain has a baseline hyperactive state since the TEPs of the SCZ appear earlier than those of the HC.

Abstract Image

个性化时间窗增强了 TMS-EEG 信号特征,并改善了对精神分裂症皮质功能的评估。
经颅磁刺激和脑电图(TMS-EEG)记录对于以非侵入性和无任务的方式直接评估大脑皮层的兴奋性和抑制性至关重要。TMS-EEG 信号以 TMS 诱发电位(TEP)为特征,可用于评估大脑皮层功能。然而,多年来人们一直使用不同的时间窗(TW)来计算 TEPs。而且,这些时间窗往往对所有参与者都是相同的,忽略了受试者之间的差异性。因此,本研究的目的是评估使用不同的时间窗计算 TEPs 的效果,即从通用的固定时间窗到更具适应性的个性化时间窗。二十九名健康对照组(HC)和二十名精神分裂症患者(SCZ)接受了单脉冲(SP)TMS-EEG 方案。首先,仅考虑健康对照组,以评估三种不同 TW 的 TEPs 振幅和地形分布。其次,将 SCZ 患者包括在内,以确定哪种 TW 更能描述 SCZ 的大脑改变。结果表明,尽管所有 TW 都显示出相同的趋势,但个性化程度更高的 TW 能更好地描述 SP TMS-EEG 信号。在组间比较方面,个性化 TW 能更好地区分不同人群。这些结果还进一步支持了 SCZ 患者大脑皮层兴奋/抑制可能失衡的观点,因为他们在 N45 TEP 中的活动减少,而在 N100 中的振幅值较大。研究结果还表明,由于 SCZ 的 TEPs 比 HC 的 TEPs 出现得早,因此 SCZ 的大脑具有基线亢奋状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信