Satellite Derived Trait Data Slightly Improves Tropical Forest Biomass, NPP and GPP Estimates

IF 3.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Christopher E. Doughty, Camille Gaillard, Patrick Burns, Yadvinder Malhi, Alexander Shenkin, David Minor, Laura Duncanson, Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez, Scott Goetz, Hao Tang
{"title":"Satellite Derived Trait Data Slightly Improves Tropical Forest Biomass, NPP and GPP Estimates","authors":"Christopher E. Doughty,&nbsp;Camille Gaillard,&nbsp;Patrick Burns,&nbsp;Yadvinder Malhi,&nbsp;Alexander Shenkin,&nbsp;David Minor,&nbsp;Laura Duncanson,&nbsp;Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Scott Goetz,&nbsp;Hao Tang","doi":"10.1029/2024JG008108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improving tropical forest current biomass estimates can help more accurately evaluate ecosystem services in tropical forests. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar provides detailed 3D forest structure and height data, which can be used to improve above-ground biomass estimates. However, there is still debate on how best to predict tropical forest biomass using GEDI data. Here we compare stand biomass predicted by GEDI data with the observed data of 2,102 inventory plots in tropical forests and find that adding a remotely sensed (RS) trait map of leaf mass area (LMA) significantly (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) improves field biomass predictions, but by only a small amount (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.01). However, it may also help reduce the bias of the residuals because there was a negative relationship between both LMA (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.34) and percentage of phosphorus (%P, <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.31) and residuals. Leaf spectral data (400–1,075 nm) from 523 individual trees along a Peruvian tropical forest elevation gradient predicted Diameter at Breast height (DBH) (the critical measurement underlying plot biomass) with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.01 and LMA predicts DBH with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.04. Other data sets may offer further improvements and max temperature (<i>T</i><sub>max</sub>) predicts Amazonian biomass residuals with an <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> of 0.76 (<i>N</i> = 66). Finally, for a network of net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP) plots (<i>N</i> = 21), leaf traits predicted with remote sensing are better at predicting fluxes than structure variables. Overall, trait maps, especially future improved ones produced by Surface Biology Geology, may improve biomass and carbon flux predictions by a small but significant amount.</p>","PeriodicalId":16003,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JG008108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving tropical forest current biomass estimates can help more accurately evaluate ecosystem services in tropical forests. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar provides detailed 3D forest structure and height data, which can be used to improve above-ground biomass estimates. However, there is still debate on how best to predict tropical forest biomass using GEDI data. Here we compare stand biomass predicted by GEDI data with the observed data of 2,102 inventory plots in tropical forests and find that adding a remotely sensed (RS) trait map of leaf mass area (LMA) significantly (P < 0.001) improves field biomass predictions, but by only a small amount (r2 = 0.01). However, it may also help reduce the bias of the residuals because there was a negative relationship between both LMA (r2 of 0.34) and percentage of phosphorus (%P, r2 = 0.31) and residuals. Leaf spectral data (400–1,075 nm) from 523 individual trees along a Peruvian tropical forest elevation gradient predicted Diameter at Breast height (DBH) (the critical measurement underlying plot biomass) with an r2 = 0.01 and LMA predicts DBH with an r2 = 0.04. Other data sets may offer further improvements and max temperature (Tmax) predicts Amazonian biomass residuals with an r2 of 0.76 (N = 66). Finally, for a network of net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP) plots (N = 21), leaf traits predicted with remote sensing are better at predicting fluxes than structure variables. Overall, trait maps, especially future improved ones produced by Surface Biology Geology, may improve biomass and carbon flux predictions by a small but significant amount.

卫星推导出的性状数据略微改进了热带森林生物量、NPP 和 GPP 估算结果
改进热带森林当前生物量估算有助于更准确地评估热带森林的生态系统服务。全球生态系统动态调查(GEDI)激光雷达提供了详细的三维森林结构和高度数据,可用于改进地上生物量估算。然而,如何利用 GEDI 数据最好地预测热带森林生物量仍存在争议。在这里,我们将 GEDI 数据预测的林分生物量与 2,102 个热带雨林清查地块的观测数据进行了比较,结果发现,添加叶面积(LMA)的遥感(RS)性状图能显著(P < 0.001)改善实地生物量预测,但改善幅度很小(r2 = 0.01)。不过,这也可能有助于减少残差的偏差,因为 LMA(r2 为 0.34)和磷百分比(%P,r2 = 0.31)与残差之间存在负相关。来自秘鲁热带森林海拔梯度上 523 棵树的叶光谱数据(400-1,075 nm)对胸径(DBH)(地块生物量的关键测量指标)的预测结果为 r2 = 0.01,而 LMA 对 DBH 的预测结果为 r2 = 0.04。其他数据集可提供进一步改进,最高温度(Tmax)预测亚马逊生物量残差的 r2 为 0.76(N = 66)。最后,对于净初级生产量(NPP)和总初级生产量(GPP)地块网络(N = 21),利用遥感预测的叶片性状比结构变量更能预测通量。总体而言,性状图,尤其是未来由地表生物地质学公司制作的改进型性状图,可以在生物量和碳通量预测方面有微小但显著的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: JGR-Biogeosciences focuses on biogeosciences of the Earth system in the past, present, and future and the extension of this research to planetary studies. The emerging field of biogeosciences spans the intellectual interface between biology and the geosciences and attempts to understand the functions of the Earth system across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Studies in biogeosciences may use multiple lines of evidence drawn from diverse fields to gain a holistic understanding of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems and extreme environments. Specific topics within the scope of the section include process-based theoretical, experimental, and field studies of biogeochemistry, biogeophysics, atmosphere-, land-, and ocean-ecosystem interactions, biomineralization, life in extreme environments, astrobiology, microbial processes, geomicrobiology, and evolutionary geobiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信