Associations between PTSD and temporal discounting: The role of future thinking

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Mieke Verfaellie , Virginie Patt , Ginette Lafleche , Jennifer J. Vasterling
{"title":"Associations between PTSD and temporal discounting: The role of future thinking","authors":"Mieke Verfaellie ,&nbsp;Virginie Patt ,&nbsp;Ginette Lafleche ,&nbsp;Jennifer J. Vasterling","doi":"10.1016/j.jbtep.2024.101978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Despite documented alterations in future thinking in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), our understanding of how individuals with PTSD make future-oriented decisions is limited. We tested the hypothesis that increased discounting in association with PTSD reflects failure to spontaneously envision future rewarding situations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Thirty-seven trauma exposed war-zone veterans completed a standard temporal discounting task as well as a temporal discounting task accompanied by episodic future thinking cues.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Severity of PTSD symptoms was associated with preference for sooner, smaller rewards in the standard task. Consistent with our hypothesis, when participants engaged in future thinking, greater PTSD symptom severity was no longer associated with steeper discounting. Moreover, difficulty anticipating future events, as measured contemporaneously in a separate task (Verfaellie et al., 2024), mediated the relationship between PTSD symptom severity and degree of discounting in the standard task. Among PTSD symptom clusters, the severity of avoidance and negative alterations in cognition and mood was related to steeper discounting. Measures of depression and alcohol use were not associated with discounting.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>The sample included mostly male, predominantly White veterans who experienced primarily combat-related trauma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PTSD-associated alterations in temporal discounting reflect failure to spontaneously imagine future positive events. Two common correlates of PTSD, depression and alcohol use, could not account for the observed associations between PTSD and future-oriented decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 101978"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005791624000375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Despite documented alterations in future thinking in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), our understanding of how individuals with PTSD make future-oriented decisions is limited. We tested the hypothesis that increased discounting in association with PTSD reflects failure to spontaneously envision future rewarding situations.

Methods

Thirty-seven trauma exposed war-zone veterans completed a standard temporal discounting task as well as a temporal discounting task accompanied by episodic future thinking cues.

Results

Severity of PTSD symptoms was associated with preference for sooner, smaller rewards in the standard task. Consistent with our hypothesis, when participants engaged in future thinking, greater PTSD symptom severity was no longer associated with steeper discounting. Moreover, difficulty anticipating future events, as measured contemporaneously in a separate task (Verfaellie et al., 2024), mediated the relationship between PTSD symptom severity and degree of discounting in the standard task. Among PTSD symptom clusters, the severity of avoidance and negative alterations in cognition and mood was related to steeper discounting. Measures of depression and alcohol use were not associated with discounting.

Limitations

The sample included mostly male, predominantly White veterans who experienced primarily combat-related trauma.

Conclusions

PTSD-associated alterations in temporal discounting reflect failure to spontaneously imagine future positive events. Two common correlates of PTSD, depression and alcohol use, could not account for the observed associations between PTSD and future-oriented decisions.

创伤后应激障碍与时间折扣之间的关联:未来思维的作用
背景和目的:尽管有文献记载创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的未来思维会发生改变,但我们对创伤后应激障碍患者如何做出面向未来的决策的了解还很有限。我们测试了这样一个假设:与创伤后应激障碍相关的贴现增加反映了患者无法自发地设想未来有回报的情况:结果:创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度与创伤后应激障碍患者的未来决策有关:在标准任务中,创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度与偏好更快、更小的奖励有关。与我们的假设一致的是,当参与者进行未来思考时,创伤后应激障碍症状的严重程度不再与陡峭的折现相关联。此外,在另一项任务中同时测量的未来事件预测困难(Verfaellie 等人,2024 年),在标准任务中对创伤后应激障碍症状严重程度与折扣程度之间的关系起到了中介作用。在创伤后应激障碍症状群中,回避的严重程度以及认知和情绪的负面改变与更陡峭的折扣有关。抑郁和酗酒与折现无关:局限性:样本中的退伍军人大多为男性,以白人为主,主要经历过与战斗有关的创伤:与创伤后应激障碍相关的时间折现改变反映了人们无法自发地想象未来的积极事件。创伤后应激障碍的两个常见相关因素--抑郁和酗酒,无法解释创伤后应激障碍与面向未来的决策之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The publication of the book Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition (1958) by the co-founding editor of this Journal, Joseph Wolpe, marked a major change in the understanding and treatment of mental disorders. The book used principles from empirical behavioral science to explain psychopathological phenomena and the resulting explanations were critically tested and used to derive effective treatments. The second half of the 20th century saw this rigorous scientific approach come to fruition. Experimental approaches to psychopathology, in particular those used to test conditioning theories and cognitive theories, have steadily expanded, and experimental analysis of processes characterising and maintaining mental disorders have become an established research area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信