Expired blood transfusion and mortality outcomes in combat trauma patients.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1111/trf.17943
Brian C Riley, Jimmy Phuong, Rida A Hasan, Lynn G Stansbury, John R Hess, Daniel J Roubik
{"title":"Expired blood transfusion and mortality outcomes in combat trauma patients.","authors":"Brian C Riley, Jimmy Phuong, Rida A Hasan, Lynn G Stansbury, John R Hess, Daniel J Roubik","doi":"10.1111/trf.17943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expired blood can be transfused if clinically indicated but outcome data do not exist. We hypothesized that modestly outdated blood can effectively support a hemorrhaging patient until surgical control is achieved. This study assessed whether expired blood was associated with mortality in combat trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of Armed Services Blood Program and Department of Defense Trauma Registry databases evaluated combat casualty records (2001-2023). The intervention of interest was transfusion of at least one unit of whole blood (WB), red blood cells (RBC), or platelets within one week past expiration. The outcome of interest was mortality at discharge. A control cohort that only received in-date blood was matched to the treatment cohort for logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred patients received expired RBCs (86), WB (11), and platelets (3). Mortality at discharge was 11.6% for expired RBC recipients and 13.4% for the control cohort (p = .97). After adjustment for injury severity, expired RBCs were not associated with mortality (OR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.14-1.16]; p = .09). Of 10 patients who received the most expired RBCs by volume or storage duration, two were deceased at discharge. All 14 expired WB and platelet recipients were alive at discharge, but sample sizes were underpowered for regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Transfusion of modestly outdated RBCs was not associated with mortality in combat trauma patients. Expired WB and platelet recipients did well, but sample sizes were too small to draw significant conclusions. Expired blood should be further investigated for possible use in extenuating circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.17943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Expired blood can be transfused if clinically indicated but outcome data do not exist. We hypothesized that modestly outdated blood can effectively support a hemorrhaging patient until surgical control is achieved. This study assessed whether expired blood was associated with mortality in combat trauma patients.

Study design and methods: A retrospective analysis of Armed Services Blood Program and Department of Defense Trauma Registry databases evaluated combat casualty records (2001-2023). The intervention of interest was transfusion of at least one unit of whole blood (WB), red blood cells (RBC), or platelets within one week past expiration. The outcome of interest was mortality at discharge. A control cohort that only received in-date blood was matched to the treatment cohort for logistic regression analysis.

Results: One hundred patients received expired RBCs (86), WB (11), and platelets (3). Mortality at discharge was 11.6% for expired RBC recipients and 13.4% for the control cohort (p = .97). After adjustment for injury severity, expired RBCs were not associated with mortality (OR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.14-1.16]; p = .09). Of 10 patients who received the most expired RBCs by volume or storage duration, two were deceased at discharge. All 14 expired WB and platelet recipients were alive at discharge, but sample sizes were underpowered for regression analysis.

Discussion: Transfusion of modestly outdated RBCs was not associated with mortality in combat trauma patients. Expired WB and platelet recipients did well, but sample sizes were too small to draw significant conclusions. Expired blood should be further investigated for possible use in extenuating circumstances.

战斗创伤患者的过期输血和死亡结果。
背景:如果临床需要,可以输注过期血液,但结果数据并不存在。我们假设,适度过期的血液可以有效地支持大出血患者,直到手术得到控制。本研究评估了过期血液是否与战斗创伤患者的死亡率有关:对武装部队血液计划和国防部创伤登记数据库进行了回顾性分析,评估了战斗伤亡记录(2001-2023 年)。所关注的干预措施是在过期一周内输注至少一个单位的全血(WB)、红细胞(RBC)或血小板。关注的结果是出院时的死亡率。仅接受过期血液的对照组与治疗组进行了匹配,以进行逻辑回归分析:结果:100 名患者接受了过期红细胞(86 例)、白细胞(11 例)和血小板(3 例)。过期红细胞接受者出院时的死亡率为 11.6%,对照组为 13.4%(p = .97)。对损伤严重程度进行调整后,过期红细胞与死亡率无关(OR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.14-1.16];P = 0.09)。在接受过期红细胞数量或储存时间最多的 10 名患者中,有两人在出院时已经死亡。所有 14 名过期白细胞和血小板接受者出院时均健在,但样本量不足以进行回归分析:讨论:输注适度过期的红细胞与战斗创伤患者的死亡率无关。讨论:输注适度过期的红细胞与战斗创伤患者的死亡率无关,过期白细胞和血小板接受者表现良好,但样本量太小,无法得出重要结论。应进一步研究在特殊情况下是否可以使用过期血液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信