Outcomes Among Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White Informal Stroke Caregivers.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047035
Lynda D Lisabeth, Linda C Gallo, Janet Prvu-Bettger, Madeline Kwicklis, Elizabeth M Almendarez, Lewis B Morgenstern
{"title":"Outcomes Among Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White Informal Stroke Caregivers.","authors":"Lynda D Lisabeth, Linda C Gallo, Janet Prvu-Bettger, Madeline Kwicklis, Elizabeth M Almendarez, Lewis B Morgenstern","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Informal home care is prevalent among Mexican American stroke survivors, but data on the impact on caregivers are not available. The aim was to assess ethnic differences in informal stroke caregiving and caregiver outcomes at 90 days poststroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Informal caregivers were recruited from the population-based Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project (2019-2023), conducted in a bi-ethnic community in Texas. Caregivers of community-dwelling stroke survivors who were not cognitively impaired and not employed by a formal caregiving agency were interviewed. Interviews included sociodemographics, dyad characteristics, Modified Caregiver Strain Index (range 0-26, higher more positive), Positive Aspects of Caregiving scale (range, 5-45, higher more), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (range, 0-30, higher worse), and PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)-10 physical (range, 16.2-67.7, higher better) and mental health (range, 21.2-67.6, higher better) summary scores. Stroke survivor data was from interviews and medical records. Propensity score methods were used to balance caregiver and patient factors among Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White caregivers by fitting a model with ethnicity of caregiver as the outcome and predictors being caregiver sociodemographics, patient-caregiver dyad characteristics, and patient sociodemographics and functional disability. Propensity scores were included as a covariate in regression models, considering the association between ethnicity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mexican American caregivers were younger, more likely female, and more likely a child of the stroke survivor than Non-Hispanic White caregivers. Mexican American caregiver ethnicity was associated with less caregiver strain (β, -1.87 [95% CI, -3.51 to -0.22]) and depressive symptoms (β, -2.02 [95% CI, -3.41 to -0.64]) and more favorable mental health (β, 4.90 [95% CI, 2.49-7.31]) and positive aspects of caregiving (β, 3.29 [95% CI, 1.35-5.23]) but not associated with physical health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the mechanisms behind more favorable caregiver outcomes in Mexican American people may aid in the design of culturally sensitive interventions to improve both caregiver and stroke survivor outcomes, potentially across all race and ethnic groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Informal home care is prevalent among Mexican American stroke survivors, but data on the impact on caregivers are not available. The aim was to assess ethnic differences in informal stroke caregiving and caregiver outcomes at 90 days poststroke.

Methods: Informal caregivers were recruited from the population-based Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project (2019-2023), conducted in a bi-ethnic community in Texas. Caregivers of community-dwelling stroke survivors who were not cognitively impaired and not employed by a formal caregiving agency were interviewed. Interviews included sociodemographics, dyad characteristics, Modified Caregiver Strain Index (range 0-26, higher more positive), Positive Aspects of Caregiving scale (range, 5-45, higher more), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (range, 0-30, higher worse), and PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System)-10 physical (range, 16.2-67.7, higher better) and mental health (range, 21.2-67.6, higher better) summary scores. Stroke survivor data was from interviews and medical records. Propensity score methods were used to balance caregiver and patient factors among Mexican American and Non-Hispanic White caregivers by fitting a model with ethnicity of caregiver as the outcome and predictors being caregiver sociodemographics, patient-caregiver dyad characteristics, and patient sociodemographics and functional disability. Propensity scores were included as a covariate in regression models, considering the association between ethnicity and outcomes.

Results: Mexican American caregivers were younger, more likely female, and more likely a child of the stroke survivor than Non-Hispanic White caregivers. Mexican American caregiver ethnicity was associated with less caregiver strain (β, -1.87 [95% CI, -3.51 to -0.22]) and depressive symptoms (β, -2.02 [95% CI, -3.41 to -0.64]) and more favorable mental health (β, 4.90 [95% CI, 2.49-7.31]) and positive aspects of caregiving (β, 3.29 [95% CI, 1.35-5.23]) but not associated with physical health.

Conclusions: Understanding the mechanisms behind more favorable caregiver outcomes in Mexican American people may aid in the design of culturally sensitive interventions to improve both caregiver and stroke survivor outcomes, potentially across all race and ethnic groups.

墨西哥裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人非正规中风护理人员的治疗效果。
背景:非正规家庭护理在墨西哥裔美国人中风幸存者中很普遍,但有关其对护理者影响的数据尚缺。本研究旨在评估中风后 90 天非正式护理的种族差异和护理者的结果:在得克萨斯州的一个双种族社区开展的科珀斯克里斯蒂脑卒中监测项目(2019-2023 年)招募了非正式护理人员。对居住在社区的中风幸存者的照顾者进行了访谈,这些照顾者没有认知障碍,也没有受雇于正规的照顾机构。访谈内容包括社会人口统计学、二人组特征、改良照护者压力指数(范围 0-26,越高越积极)、照护的积极方面量表(范围 5-45,越高越积极)、患者健康问卷-8(范围 0-30,越差越积极)和 PROMIS(患者报告结果测量信息系统)-10 身体健康(范围 16.2-67.7,越高越积极)和心理健康(范围 21.2-67.6,越高越积极)总分。中风幸存者数据来自访谈和医疗记录。在墨西哥裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人护理人员中使用倾向得分法来平衡护理人员和患者的因素,方法是拟合一个模型,以护理人员的种族为结果,预测因素为护理人员的社会人口统计学特征、患者-护理人员二人组特征以及患者的社会人口统计学特征和功能障碍。考虑到种族与结果之间的关联,倾向分数被作为协变量纳入回归模型:结果:与非西班牙裔白人护理者相比,墨西哥裔美国人护理者更年轻,更可能是女性,更可能是中风患者的子女。墨西哥裔美国人护理者的种族与较少的护理者压力(β,-1.87 [95% CI,-3.51 至 -0.22])和抑郁症状(β,-2.02 [95% CI,-3.41 至 -0.64])以及较好的心理健康(β,4.90 [95% CI,2.49 至 7.31])和积极的护理方面(β,3.29 [95% CI,1.35 至 5.23])相关,但与身体健康无关:结论:了解墨西哥裔美国人护理结果更佳背后的机制可能有助于设计文化敏感的干预措施,以改善护理者和中风幸存者的结果,这可能适用于所有种族和族裔群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信