Unsupervised Clustering of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis and C3 Glomerulopathy Patients Discovers Distinct Patient Groups unlike the Current Classification.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Nephron Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1159/000539893
Marja Kovala, Minna Seppälä, Mikolaj Wojnicki, Eero Honkanen, Seppo Meri, Kati Kaartinen, Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski
{"title":"Unsupervised Clustering of Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis and C3 Glomerulopathy Patients Discovers Distinct Patient Groups unlike the Current Classification.","authors":"Marja Kovala, Minna Seppälä, Mikolaj Wojnicki, Eero Honkanen, Seppo Meri, Kati Kaartinen, Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski","doi":"10.1159/000539893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis is currently divided into immunoglobulin-mediated glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G); however, the patients often overlap with histology, complement, clinical and prognostic factors. Our aim was to investigate if an unsupervised clustering method finds different patient groups in 44 IC-MPGN/C3G patients using only histological and clinical data available in everyday clinical work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary IC-MPGN/C3G adult patients were included whose diagnostic (baseline) native biopsy was obtained in 2006-2017. The biopsies were reassessed and the clinical data at baseline and during follow-up were obtained from the medical records. There were 39 baseline histological and clinical variables included in the unsupervised clustering. Follow-up information was combined with the clustering results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clustering resulted in two clusters (n = 24 and n = 20 patients for clusters 1-2, respectively), where cluster 1 had a significantly higher baseline plasma creatinine (mean 213 vs. 104, respectively, p value &lt;0.001) and a lower baseline eGFR than cluster 2 (mean 37 vs. 70, respectively, p value &lt;0.001). Regarding histology, chronic changes such as lobulated glomeruli, mesangial matrix expansion, and glomeruli double contours were more prevalent in cluster 1 (p value &lt;0.001). Biopsy morphology was more often crescentic and membranoproliferative in cluster 1 (p value &lt;0.001). Although the differences were insignificant, cluster 1 patients were in dialysis in the last follow-up or had a progressive disease more often than cluster 2 patients (21% vs. 5%, 38% vs. 10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that these patients share greater similarity than the current classification IC-MPGN versus C3G indicates.</p>","PeriodicalId":18998,"journal":{"name":"Nephron","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539893","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis is currently divided into immunoglobulin-mediated glomerulonephritis (IC-MPGN) and C3 glomerulopathy (C3G); however, the patients often overlap with histology, complement, clinical and prognostic factors. Our aim was to investigate if an unsupervised clustering method finds different patient groups in 44 IC-MPGN/C3G patients using only histological and clinical data available in everyday clinical work.

Methods: Primary IC-MPGN/C3G adult patients were included whose diagnostic (baseline) native biopsy was obtained in 2006-2017. The biopsies were reassessed and the clinical data at baseline and during follow-up were obtained from the medical records. There were 39 baseline histological and clinical variables included in the unsupervised clustering. Follow-up information was combined with the clustering results.

Results: The clustering resulted in two clusters (n = 24 and n = 20 patients for clusters 1-2, respectively), where cluster 1 had a significantly higher baseline plasma creatinine (mean 213 vs. 104, respectively, p value <0.001) and a lower baseline eGFR than cluster 2 (mean 37 vs. 70, respectively, p value <0.001). Regarding histology, chronic changes such as lobulated glomeruli, mesangial matrix expansion, and glomeruli double contours were more prevalent in cluster 1 (p value <0.001). Biopsy morphology was more often crescentic and membranoproliferative in cluster 1 (p value <0.001). Although the differences were insignificant, cluster 1 patients were in dialysis in the last follow-up or had a progressive disease more often than cluster 2 patients (21% vs. 5%, 38% vs. 10%).

Conclusions: Our results indicate that these patients share greater similarity than the current classification IC-MPGN versus C3G indicates.

对膜增生性肾小球肾炎和 C3 肾小球病患者进行无监督聚类,发现了与现有分类不同的患者群体。
导言:膜增生性肾小球肾炎目前被分为免疫球蛋白介导的肾小球肾炎(IC-MPGN)和C3肾小球病变(C3G),但患者往往在组织学、补体、临床和预后因素方面存在重叠。我们的目的是研究一种无监督聚类方法能否仅利用日常临床工作中获得的组织学和临床数据,在 44 名 IC-MPGN/C3G 患者中发现不同的患者群体:纳入2006-2017年期间获得诊断(基线)原位活检的原发性IC-MPGN/C3G成人患者。对活检结果进行重新评估,并从病历中获取基线和随访期间的临床数据。无监督聚类包含 39 个基线组织学和临床变量。随访信息与聚类结果相结合:聚类产生了两个群组(1-2群组分别有24名和20名患者),其中第1群组的基线血浆肌酐明显高于第2群组(分别为213和104,P值为0.001),基线eGFR也低于第2群组(分别为37和70,P值为0.001)。在组织学方面,第 1 组中分叶肾小球、系膜基质扩张和肾小球双轮廓等慢性变化更为普遍(P 值为 0.001)。第 1 组的活检形态多为新月体和膜增生(P 值为 0.001)。虽然差异不显著,但第 1 组患者在最后一次随访中接受透析或病情进展的比例高于第 2 组患者(21% 对 5%,38% 对 10%):我们的研究结果表明,这些患者的相似性比目前的 IC-MPGN 与 C3G 分类所显示的更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nephron
Nephron UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ''Nephron'' comprises three sections, which are each under the editorship of internationally recognized leaders and served by specialized Associate Editors. Apart from high-quality original research, ''Nephron'' publishes invited reviews/minireviews on up-to-date topics. Papers undergo an innovative and transparent peer review process encompassing a Presentation Report which assesses and summarizes the presentation of the paper in an unbiased and standardized way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信