External validation of a 2-year all-cause mortality prediction tool developed using machine learning in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Dung N T Tran, Michel Ducher, Denis Fouque, Jean-Pierre Fauvel
{"title":"External validation of a 2-year all-cause mortality prediction tool developed using machine learning in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease.","authors":"Dung N T Tran, Michel Ducher, Denis Fouque, Jean-Pierre Fauvel","doi":"10.1007/s40620-024-02011-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased mortality. Individual mortality prediction could be of interest to improve individual clinical outcomes. Using an independent regional dataset, the aim of the present study was to externally validate the recently published 2-year all-cause mortality prediction tool developed using machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validation dataset of stage 4 or 5 CKD outpatients was used. External validation performance of the prediction tool at the optimal cutoff-point was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A survival analysis was then performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 527 outpatients with stage 4 or 5 CKD were analyzed. During the 2 years of follow-up, 91 patients died and 436 survived. Compared to the learning dataset, patients in the validation dataset were significantly younger, and the ratio of deceased patients in the validation dataset was significantly lower. The performance of the prediction tool at the optimal cutoff-point was: AUC-ROC = 0.72, accuracy = 63.6%, sensitivity = 72.5%, and specificity = 61.7%. The survival curves of the predicted survived and the predicted deceased groups were significantly different (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2-year all-cause mortality prediction tool for patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD showed satisfactory discriminatory capacity with emphasis on sensitivity. The proposed prediction tool appears to be of clinical interest for further development.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-024-02011-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased mortality. Individual mortality prediction could be of interest to improve individual clinical outcomes. Using an independent regional dataset, the aim of the present study was to externally validate the recently published 2-year all-cause mortality prediction tool developed using machine learning.

Methods: A validation dataset of stage 4 or 5 CKD outpatients was used. External validation performance of the prediction tool at the optimal cutoff-point was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A survival analysis was then performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: Data of 527 outpatients with stage 4 or 5 CKD were analyzed. During the 2 years of follow-up, 91 patients died and 436 survived. Compared to the learning dataset, patients in the validation dataset were significantly younger, and the ratio of deceased patients in the validation dataset was significantly lower. The performance of the prediction tool at the optimal cutoff-point was: AUC-ROC = 0.72, accuracy = 63.6%, sensitivity = 72.5%, and specificity = 61.7%. The survival curves of the predicted survived and the predicted deceased groups were significantly different (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The 2-year all-cause mortality prediction tool for patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD showed satisfactory discriminatory capacity with emphasis on sensitivity. The proposed prediction tool appears to be of clinical interest for further development.

Abstract Image

在 4-5 期慢性肾病患者中使用机器学习开发的 2 年全因死亡率预测工具的外部验证。
背景:慢性肾脏病(CKD)与死亡率升高有关。个人死亡率预测对改善个人临床预后很有意义。本研究利用一个独立的地区数据集,旨在从外部验证最近发表的利用机器学习开发的两年全因死亡率预测工具:方法:使用一个由 4 期或 5 期 CKD 门诊病人组成的验证数据集。通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)、准确性、灵敏度和特异性评估了预测工具在最佳截断点的外部验证性能。然后采用 Kaplan-Meier 法进行生存分析:结果:分析了 527 名 4 期或 5 期慢性肾脏病门诊患者的数据。在两年的随访期间,91名患者死亡,436名患者存活。与学习数据集相比,验证数据集中的患者明显更年轻,而且验证数据集中死亡患者的比例明显更低。预测工具在最佳截断点的性能为AUC-ROC = 0.72,准确率 = 63.6%,灵敏度 = 72.5%,特异性 = 61.7%。预测存活组和预测死亡组的生存曲线有显著差异(P针对 4 期或 5 期慢性肾脏病患者的 2 年全因死亡率预测工具显示出令人满意的判别能力,重点是灵敏度。所提出的预测工具似乎具有进一步开发的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信