Persistent effectiveness of CGRP antibody therapy in migraine and comorbid medication overuse or medication overuse headache - a retrospective real-world analysis.

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Armin Scheffler, Jale Basten, Lennart Menzel, Dominik Binz, Wolfgang Alexander Becker, Vincent Breunung, Hannah Schenk, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Michael Nsaka, Diana Lindner, Dagny Holle
{"title":"Persistent effectiveness of CGRP antibody therapy in migraine and comorbid medication overuse or medication overuse headache - a retrospective real-world analysis.","authors":"Armin Scheffler, Jale Basten, Lennart Menzel, Dominik Binz, Wolfgang Alexander Becker, Vincent Breunung, Hannah Schenk, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Michael Nsaka, Diana Lindner, Dagny Holle","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01813-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of patients with migraine who have concomitant medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) is a major problem in clinical practice. Detoxification of acute analgesics before or during initiation of prophylactic therapy has long been recommended although this concept has recently been questioned. Additionally, relapse after detoxification is a common problem. This real-world study analyses the initial and sustained effectiveness of prophylactic migraine therapy with CGRP (receptor) antibodies without prior detoxification in patients with comorbid MO or MOH for up to one year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective real-world analysis was performed on 291 patients (episodic migraine (EM) with MO (EM-MO; n = 35), EM without MO (EM-noMO; n = 77), chronic migraine (CM) with MOH (CM-MOH; n = 109), CM without MOH (CM-noMOH; n = 70). All patients began treatment with either erenumab (n = 173), fremanezumab (n = 70) or galcanezumab (n = 48) without prior detoxification. Data were available for up to 12 months of treatment. Responder rates for monthly headache days (MHD), monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly acute medication intake (AMD) were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups showed a significant reduction in MHD, MMD and AMD at the last observed time point compared to baseline. In patients with CM and MOH, 60.6% (66/109) no longer fulfilled the definition of MO or MOH and a further 13.8% (15/109) had only EM-MO. In the EM cohort, 89% (31/35) of MO patients lost their MO during therapy. MHD and AMD 30% responder rates were comparable for CM-MOH and CM-noMOH (MHD: CM-MOH: 56.0% vs. CM-noMOH: 41.4%, p = 0.058, AMD: CM-MOH: 66.1% vs. CM-noMOH: 52.9%, p = 0.077). MMD responder rate did not differ significantly (after Bonferroni adjustment) (CM-MOH: 62.4% vs. CM-noMOH: 47.1%, p = 0.045, α = 0.017). After successful initiation of therapy, 15.4% of the initial CM-MOH patients relapsed and met the criterion for CM-MOH at the end of follow-up. There were no antibody specific differences in response to therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data confirms the effectiveness of CGRP antibody treatment in migraine patients with additional MOH or MO in a real-world setting. Low relapse rates after initial successful therapy support an early start of CGRP antibody treatment in patients with MOH or MO.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>No registration, retrospective analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01813-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Management of patients with migraine who have concomitant medication overuse (MO) or medication overuse headache (MOH) is a major problem in clinical practice. Detoxification of acute analgesics before or during initiation of prophylactic therapy has long been recommended although this concept has recently been questioned. Additionally, relapse after detoxification is a common problem. This real-world study analyses the initial and sustained effectiveness of prophylactic migraine therapy with CGRP (receptor) antibodies without prior detoxification in patients with comorbid MO or MOH for up to one year.

Methods: A retrospective real-world analysis was performed on 291 patients (episodic migraine (EM) with MO (EM-MO; n = 35), EM without MO (EM-noMO; n = 77), chronic migraine (CM) with MOH (CM-MOH; n = 109), CM without MOH (CM-noMOH; n = 70). All patients began treatment with either erenumab (n = 173), fremanezumab (n = 70) or galcanezumab (n = 48) without prior detoxification. Data were available for up to 12 months of treatment. Responder rates for monthly headache days (MHD), monthly migraine days (MMD) and monthly acute medication intake (AMD) were analysed.

Results: All groups showed a significant reduction in MHD, MMD and AMD at the last observed time point compared to baseline. In patients with CM and MOH, 60.6% (66/109) no longer fulfilled the definition of MO or MOH and a further 13.8% (15/109) had only EM-MO. In the EM cohort, 89% (31/35) of MO patients lost their MO during therapy. MHD and AMD 30% responder rates were comparable for CM-MOH and CM-noMOH (MHD: CM-MOH: 56.0% vs. CM-noMOH: 41.4%, p = 0.058, AMD: CM-MOH: 66.1% vs. CM-noMOH: 52.9%, p = 0.077). MMD responder rate did not differ significantly (after Bonferroni adjustment) (CM-MOH: 62.4% vs. CM-noMOH: 47.1%, p = 0.045, α = 0.017). After successful initiation of therapy, 15.4% of the initial CM-MOH patients relapsed and met the criterion for CM-MOH at the end of follow-up. There were no antibody specific differences in response to therapy.

Conclusions: Our data confirms the effectiveness of CGRP antibody treatment in migraine patients with additional MOH or MO in a real-world setting. Low relapse rates after initial successful therapy support an early start of CGRP antibody treatment in patients with MOH or MO.

Trial registration: No registration, retrospective analysis.

CGRP 抗体疗法对偏头痛和合并药物滥用或药物滥用性头痛的持续疗效--一项回顾性真实世界分析。
背景:偏头痛患者如果同时伴有药物过度使用(MO)或药物过度使用性头痛(MOH),其治疗是临床实践中的一个主要问题。长期以来,人们一直建议在开始预防性治疗之前或期间对急性镇痛药进行解毒,尽管这一概念最近受到质疑。此外,解毒后复发也是一个常见问题。这项真实世界研究分析了使用CGRP(受体)抗体预防性治疗偏头痛的初始疗效和持续疗效,该疗法无需事先对合并MO或MOH的患者进行长达一年的解毒治疗:对291名患者(伴有MO的发作性偏头痛(EM)(EM-MO;n = 35),不伴有MO的发作性偏头痛(EM-noMO;n = 77),伴有MOH的慢性偏头痛(CM)(CM-MOH;n = 109),不伴有MOH的慢性偏头痛(CM-noMOH;n = 70))进行了回顾性真实世界分析。所有患者均开始接受erenumab(n = 173)、fremanezumab(n = 70)或galcanezumab(n = 48)治疗,无需事先解毒。可获得长达 12 个月的治疗数据。对每月头痛天数(MHD)、每月偏头痛天数(MMD)和每月急性药物摄入量(AMD)的应答率进行了分析:结果:与基线相比,所有组别在最后观察时间点的每月头痛天数(MHD)、每月偏头痛天数(MMD)和每月急性药物摄入量(AMD)均明显减少。在患有CM和MOH的患者中,60.6%(66/109)不再符合MO或MOH的定义,另有13.8%(15/109)仅患有EM-MO。在EM队列中,89%(31/35)的MO患者在治疗期间丧失了MO。CM-MOH和CM-noMOH的MHD和AMD 30%应答率相当(MHD:CM-MOH:56.0% vs. CM-noMOH:41.4%,p = 0.058;AMD:CM-MOH:66.1% vs. CM-noMOH:52.9%,p = 0.077)。MMD应答率没有显著差异(经Bonferroni调整后)(CM-MOH:62.4% vs. CM-noMOH:47.1%,p = 0.045,α = 0.017)。在成功开始治疗后,15.4% 的初始 CM-MOH 患者复发,并在随访结束时达到 CM-MOH 标准。对治疗的反应没有抗体特异性差异:我们的数据证实了 CGRP 抗体治疗在实际环境中对伴有 MOH 或 MO 的偏头痛患者的有效性。初次治疗成功后的复发率较低,这支持对MOH或MO患者尽早开始CGRP抗体治疗:试验登记:未登记,回顾性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信