Cost-effectiveness of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations: a 5-year analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Daniel Gómez Costas, Almudena Ribed, Alvaro Gimenez-Manzorro, Ignacio Garutti, Francisco Javier Sanz, Irene Taladriz-Sender, Sergio Herrero, Yeray Rioja, Anais Carrillo, Ana Herranz, María Sanjurjo-Saez
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations: a 5-year analysis.","authors":"Daniel Gómez Costas, Almudena Ribed, Alvaro Gimenez-Manzorro, Ignacio Garutti, Francisco Javier Sanz, Irene Taladriz-Sender, Sergio Herrero, Yeray Rioja, Anais Carrillo, Ana Herranz, María Sanjurjo-Saez","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Preoperative medication errors can be prevented by screening patients through a preoperative pharmaceutical care consultation. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of implementing such a consultation and to determine which patients would benefit most.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted that included all patients who underwent a preoperative pharmacy consultation between 2016 and 2020. During this consultation, two part-time pharmacists reviewed patients' appropriate preoperative chronic medication management. All prevented errors were collected and classified by therapeutic group and type of error. A team of pharmacists and anaesthetists assigned to each prevented medication error a probability of causing an adverse event 'p', following the methodology of Nesbit <i>et al</i> by establishing five different 'p' values: 0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.4, and 0.6. 'p' = 1 was not considered. The cost of an adverse event was determined to be between €4124 and €6946 according to current literature, and a sensitivity analysis was performed by increasing the interval by 20% above and below. The cost of employing two part-time specialist pharmacists was estimated to be €59 142. Savings per medication error prevented were calculated as (€4124 OR €6946) × 'p'. Total savings were the sum of all costs associated with prevented medication errors. Patients on chronic medications who were in therapeutic groups with a 0.6 probability of an adverse event or who were in therapeutic groups responsible for 50% of the prevented adverse events were considered prioritisable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>3105 patients attended the consultation and 1179 medication errors were prevented, corresponding to 300 adverse events. 42.2% of the errors had a 'p' of 0.4. The costs avoided by this consultation ranged from €1 237 200 to €2 083 800, while the cost of its implementation was €295 710. The cost-effectiveness ratio was between €4.2 and €7.0 saved per euro invested. In the sensitivity analysis, the ratios ranged from €3.3 to €8.5 per euro invested. Fifteen different therapeutic groups accounted for 90% of the medication errors prevented. The therapeutic groups 'Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system', 'Antidiabetics, non-insulin (excluding SGLT2)' and 'Antithrombotics: low molecular weight heparins' were responsible for 56% of the prevented adverse events. The therapeutic groups 'Antidiabetics: rapid-acting insulin' and 'Antithrombotic agents: vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparins, or direct oral anticoagulants' had a 'p' of 0.6. Therefore, patients in six therapeutic groups should be prioritised for preoperative pharmacy counselling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations in Spain has proven to be cost-effective. Incorporating the probability of a medication error causing an adverse event allowed the prioritisation of patients for these consultations. Patients taking anticoagulants, oral antidiabetics, rapid-acting insulins, and agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system benefited the most. This study could serve as a basis for implementing such consultations in other hospitals, as they are effective in reducing the cost of medication errors in surgical patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2024-004222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Preoperative medication errors can be prevented by screening patients through a preoperative pharmaceutical care consultation. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of implementing such a consultation and to determine which patients would benefit most.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted that included all patients who underwent a preoperative pharmacy consultation between 2016 and 2020. During this consultation, two part-time pharmacists reviewed patients' appropriate preoperative chronic medication management. All prevented errors were collected and classified by therapeutic group and type of error. A team of pharmacists and anaesthetists assigned to each prevented medication error a probability of causing an adverse event 'p', following the methodology of Nesbit et al by establishing five different 'p' values: 0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.4, and 0.6. 'p' = 1 was not considered. The cost of an adverse event was determined to be between €4124 and €6946 according to current literature, and a sensitivity analysis was performed by increasing the interval by 20% above and below. The cost of employing two part-time specialist pharmacists was estimated to be €59 142. Savings per medication error prevented were calculated as (€4124 OR €6946) × 'p'. Total savings were the sum of all costs associated with prevented medication errors. Patients on chronic medications who were in therapeutic groups with a 0.6 probability of an adverse event or who were in therapeutic groups responsible for 50% of the prevented adverse events were considered prioritisable.

Results: 3105 patients attended the consultation and 1179 medication errors were prevented, corresponding to 300 adverse events. 42.2% of the errors had a 'p' of 0.4. The costs avoided by this consultation ranged from €1 237 200 to €2 083 800, while the cost of its implementation was €295 710. The cost-effectiveness ratio was between €4.2 and €7.0 saved per euro invested. In the sensitivity analysis, the ratios ranged from €3.3 to €8.5 per euro invested. Fifteen different therapeutic groups accounted for 90% of the medication errors prevented. The therapeutic groups 'Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system', 'Antidiabetics, non-insulin (excluding SGLT2)' and 'Antithrombotics: low molecular weight heparins' were responsible for 56% of the prevented adverse events. The therapeutic groups 'Antidiabetics: rapid-acting insulin' and 'Antithrombotic agents: vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparins, or direct oral anticoagulants' had a 'p' of 0.6. Therefore, patients in six therapeutic groups should be prioritised for preoperative pharmacy counselling.

Conclusions: The implementation of preoperative pharmaceutical care consultations in Spain has proven to be cost-effective. Incorporating the probability of a medication error causing an adverse event allowed the prioritisation of patients for these consultations. Patients taking anticoagulants, oral antidiabetics, rapid-acting insulins, and agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system benefited the most. This study could serve as a basis for implementing such consultations in other hospitals, as they are effective in reducing the cost of medication errors in surgical patients.

术前药物护理咨询的成本效益:5 年分析。
目的:通过术前药物护理咨询对患者进行筛查,可以预防术前用药错误。本研究旨在分析实施此类咨询的成本效益,并确定哪些患者最能从中受益:我们开展了一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2016 年至 2020 年期间接受术前药学咨询的所有患者。在咨询过程中,两名兼职药剂师对患者术前适当的慢性药物管理进行了审查。收集了所有预防性错误,并按治疗组和错误类型进行了分类。由药剂师和麻醉师组成的团队按照 Nesbit 等人的方法,为每个预防性用药错误设定了导致不良事件的概率 "p",即设定五个不同的 "p "值:0、0.01、0.1、0.4 和 0.6。p' = 1 则不予考虑。根据目前的文献资料,不良事件的成本被确定为 4124 欧元至 6946 欧元,并进行了敏感性分析,将区间上下提高 20%。聘用两名兼职专业药剂师的成本估计为 59 142 欧元。每次避免用药错误所节省的费用计算公式为(4124 欧元或 6946 欧元)×"p"。节省的总费用是与预防用药错误相关的所有费用的总和。长期用药的患者如果属于发生不良事件概率为 0.6 的治疗组,或属于对 50%的预防不良事件负责的治疗组,则被视为可优先处理:结果:3105 名患者参加了会诊,预防了 1179 次用药错误,相当于 300 次不良事件。42.2%的错误 "p "值为 0.4。此次会诊避免的费用从 1 237 200 欧元到 2 083 800 欧元不等,而实施费用为 295 710 欧元。每投入 1 欧元可节省 4.2 至 7.0 欧元的成本效益比。在敏感性分析中,每投入 1 欧元的成本效益比为 3.3 欧元至 8.5 欧元。15 个不同的治疗组占所预防用药错误的 90%。作用于肾素-血管紧张素系统的制剂"、"抗糖尿病药,非胰岛素类(不包括 SGLT2)"和 "抗血栓药:低分子量肝素 "这三个治疗组占所预防不良事件的 56%。抗糖尿病药:速效胰岛素 "和 "抗血栓药:维生素 K 拮抗剂、低分子量肝素或直接口服抗凝剂 "治疗组的 "p "为 0.6。因此,六个治疗组的患者应优先进行术前药学咨询:在西班牙实施术前药学咨询被证明是符合成本效益的。将用药错误导致不良事件的概率纳入考虑范围后,就能确定患者接受咨询的优先顺序。服用抗凝剂、口服抗糖尿病药、速效胰岛素和肾素-血管紧张素系统药物的患者受益最大。这项研究可作为在其他医院开展此类会诊的基础,因为此类会诊能有效降低手术患者的用药错误成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信