Portfolio optimisation: bridging the gap between theory and practice

Cristiano Arbex Valle
{"title":"Portfolio optimisation: bridging the gap between theory and practice","authors":"Cristiano Arbex Valle","doi":"arxiv-2407.00887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portfolio optimisation is widely acknowledged for its significance in\ninvestment decision-making. Yet, existing methodologies face several\nlimitations, among them converting optimal theoretical portfolios into real\ninvestment is not always straightforward. Several classes of exogenous\n(real-world) constraints have been proposed in literature with the intent of\nreducing the gap between theory and practice, which have worked to an extent. In this paper, we propose an optimisation-based framework which attempts to\nfurther reduce this gap. We have the explicit intention of producing portfolios\nthat can be immediately converted into financial holdings. Our proposed\nframework is generic in the sense that it can be used in conjunction with any\nportfolio selection model, and consists of splitting the portfolio selection\nproblem into two-stages. The main motivation behind this approach is in\nenabling automated investing with minimal human intervention, and thus the\nframework was built in such a way that real-world market features can be\nincorporated with relative ease. Among the novel contributions of this paper,\nthis is the first work, to the best of our knowledge, to combine futures\ncontracts and equities in a single framework, and also the first to consider\nborrowing costs in short positions. We present extensive computational results to illustrate the applicability of\nour approach and to evaluate its overall quality. Among these experiments, we\nobserved that alternatives from literature are susceptible to numerical errors,\nwhereas our approach effectively mitigates this issue.","PeriodicalId":501045,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.00887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Portfolio optimisation is widely acknowledged for its significance in investment decision-making. Yet, existing methodologies face several limitations, among them converting optimal theoretical portfolios into real investment is not always straightforward. Several classes of exogenous (real-world) constraints have been proposed in literature with the intent of reducing the gap between theory and practice, which have worked to an extent. In this paper, we propose an optimisation-based framework which attempts to further reduce this gap. We have the explicit intention of producing portfolios that can be immediately converted into financial holdings. Our proposed framework is generic in the sense that it can be used in conjunction with any portfolio selection model, and consists of splitting the portfolio selection problem into two-stages. The main motivation behind this approach is in enabling automated investing with minimal human intervention, and thus the framework was built in such a way that real-world market features can be incorporated with relative ease. Among the novel contributions of this paper, this is the first work, to the best of our knowledge, to combine futures contracts and equities in a single framework, and also the first to consider borrowing costs in short positions. We present extensive computational results to illustrate the applicability of our approach and to evaluate its overall quality. Among these experiments, we observed that alternatives from literature are susceptible to numerical errors, whereas our approach effectively mitigates this issue.
优化投资组合:弥合理论与实践之间的差距
投资组合优化在投资决策中的重要性已得到广泛认可。然而,现有方法面临着诸多限制,其中包括将理论上的最优投资组合转化为实际投资并不总是那么简单。为了缩小理论与实践之间的差距,文献中提出了几类外生(现实世界)约束条件,这些约束条件在一定程度上起到了作用。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于优化的框架,试图进一步缩小这一差距。我们的目的很明确,就是制作出可以立即转化为金融持股的投资组合。我们提出的框架具有通用性,可以与任何投资组合选择模型结合使用,并将投资组合选择问题分为两个阶段。这种方法背后的主要动机是在最少人工干预的情况下实现自动投资,因此该框架的构建方式可以相对轻松地纳入现实世界的市场特征。在本文的新贡献中,据我们所知,这是第一项在单一框架中结合期货合约和股票的工作,也是第一项考虑空头头寸借款成本的工作。我们提供了大量计算结果,以说明我们方法的适用性,并评估其整体质量。在这些实验中,我们发现文献中的替代方法容易出现数字错误,而我们的方法有效地缓解了这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信