A Comparison of Sigma Phase Formation in Solubilized Hyper Duplex Stainless Steel and Super Duplex Stainless Steel Filler Metals

Andres Acuna, Kaue Correa Riffel, Antonio Ramirez
{"title":"A Comparison of Sigma Phase Formation in Solubilized Hyper Duplex Stainless Steel and Super Duplex Stainless Steel Filler Metals","authors":"Andres Acuna, Kaue Correa Riffel, Antonio Ramirez","doi":"10.1007/s11661-024-07442-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on the kinetic analysis of sigma phase formation in filler metal wires on Super Duplex Stainless Steel (SDSS) and Hyper Duplex Stainless Steel (HDSS). Precipitation data reveal that in the solubilized microstructure, sigma phase kinetics are more prominent in SDSS. This increased susceptibility is attributed to the greater number of nucleation sites, which is facilitated by the larger interface area/volume and the higher chromium content in the ferrite. The difference in interface area/volume is significantly more influential in determining kinetics than the composition difference, with nucleation sites playing a central role. The sigma phase transformation in both materials was modeled using the JMAK kinetic law. The JMAK plots exhibit a transition in kinetic mechanisms, evolving from discontinuous precipitation to diffusion-controlled growth. In SDSS, the JMAK values indicate “grain boundary nucleation after saturation,” followed by “thickening of large plates.” In contrast, HDSS values point to “grain edge nucleation after saturation,” followed by “thickening of large needles.” The higher kinetics in SDSS are characterized by a smaller nucleation activation energy of 56.4 kJ/mol, in contrast to HDSS's 490.0 kJ/mol. CALPHAD-based data support the JMAK results, aligning with the maximum kinetics temperature of SDSS (875 °C to 925 °C) and HDSS (900 °C to 925 °C). Therefore, the JMAK sigma phase kinetics effectively describe the experimental data and its dual kinetics behavior, even though CALPHAD-based TTT calculations often overestimate sigma formation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18504,"journal":{"name":"Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-024-07442-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on the kinetic analysis of sigma phase formation in filler metal wires on Super Duplex Stainless Steel (SDSS) and Hyper Duplex Stainless Steel (HDSS). Precipitation data reveal that in the solubilized microstructure, sigma phase kinetics are more prominent in SDSS. This increased susceptibility is attributed to the greater number of nucleation sites, which is facilitated by the larger interface area/volume and the higher chromium content in the ferrite. The difference in interface area/volume is significantly more influential in determining kinetics than the composition difference, with nucleation sites playing a central role. The sigma phase transformation in both materials was modeled using the JMAK kinetic law. The JMAK plots exhibit a transition in kinetic mechanisms, evolving from discontinuous precipitation to diffusion-controlled growth. In SDSS, the JMAK values indicate “grain boundary nucleation after saturation,” followed by “thickening of large plates.” In contrast, HDSS values point to “grain edge nucleation after saturation,” followed by “thickening of large needles.” The higher kinetics in SDSS are characterized by a smaller nucleation activation energy of 56.4 kJ/mol, in contrast to HDSS's 490.0 kJ/mol. CALPHAD-based data support the JMAK results, aligning with the maximum kinetics temperature of SDSS (875 °C to 925 °C) and HDSS (900 °C to 925 °C). Therefore, the JMAK sigma phase kinetics effectively describe the experimental data and its dual kinetics behavior, even though CALPHAD-based TTT calculations often overestimate sigma formation.

Abstract Image

溶解超双相不锈钢和超级双相不锈钢填充金属中西格玛相形成的比较
本研究的重点是超级双相不锈钢(SDSS)和超双相不锈钢(HDSS)填料金属丝中西格玛相形成的动力学分析。沉淀数据显示,在溶解微结构中,SDSS 的σ相动力学更为突出。这种敏感性的增加归因于成核点数量的增加,而较大的界面面积/体积和铁素体中较高的铬含量又促进了成核点的增加。在决定动力学方面,界面面积/体积的差异比成分差异的影响要大得多,而成核点则起着核心作用。这两种材料的σ相变都是用 JMAK 动力学定律模拟的。JMAK 图显示了动力学机制的转变,从不连续性沉淀演变为扩散控制生长。在 SDSS 中,JMAK 值表明 "饱和后晶界成核",随后是 "大板增厚"。与此相反,HDSS 的值表明 "饱和后晶粒边缘成核",然后是 "大针加厚"。在 SDSS 中,成核活化能为 56.4 kJ/mol,与 HDSS 的 490.0 kJ/mol 相比,成核活化能较小,这也是 SDSS 动力学较高的特点。基于 CALPHAD 的数据支持 JMAK 的结果,与 SDSS(875 ℃ 至 925 ℃)和 HDSS(900 ℃ 至 925 ℃)的最高动力学温度一致。因此,尽管基于 CALPHAD 的 TTT 计算常常高估了西格玛的形成,但 JMAK 西格玛相动力学还是有效地描述了实验数据及其双重动力学行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信