Interpretation Bias Modification Affects Autobiographical Memory

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Daniel Mandelbaum, Eyal Kalanthroff
{"title":"Interpretation Bias Modification Affects Autobiographical Memory","authors":"Daniel Mandelbaum, Eyal Kalanthroff","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10505-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and Objectives</h3><p>Autobiographical memories have been found to be related to one’s current psychological state. Biases in autobiographical memories in terms of valence, content, and specificity are thought to be related to one’s well-being and mental health. Previous studies have shown that by using cognitive bias modification techniques that aim to alter one’s interpretation bias, memory valence bias could also be altered. The goal of the current study was to investigate if these techniques can also alter overgenerality of autobiographical memory, a phenomenon strongly associated with different psychopathologies. We hypothesized that creating a positive interpretation would decrease overgenerality of autobiographical memories while a negative interpretation bias would increase overgenerality.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Sixty participants were recruited and divided into two groups, positive vs. negative imagery Cognitive Bias Modification (i-CBM). Both groups completed an Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT) before and after undergoing one i-CBM session (positive or negative).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>positive i-CBM reduced overgenerality of autobiographical memories, while negative i-CBM increased it.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that changing one’s cognitive interpretation bias also changes one’s memory bias. Thus, the same task that reduces negative bias from autobiographical memories also reduces overgenerality of autobiographical memories. In addition, the results strengthen the suggestion that the use of imagery and the ability to generate specific autobiographical memories are related. These findings hold great potential for our understanding of the interconnection between the different cognitive memory biases that lay at the base of several psychopathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10505-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Autobiographical memories have been found to be related to one’s current psychological state. Biases in autobiographical memories in terms of valence, content, and specificity are thought to be related to one’s well-being and mental health. Previous studies have shown that by using cognitive bias modification techniques that aim to alter one’s interpretation bias, memory valence bias could also be altered. The goal of the current study was to investigate if these techniques can also alter overgenerality of autobiographical memory, a phenomenon strongly associated with different psychopathologies. We hypothesized that creating a positive interpretation would decrease overgenerality of autobiographical memories while a negative interpretation bias would increase overgenerality.

Methods

Sixty participants were recruited and divided into two groups, positive vs. negative imagery Cognitive Bias Modification (i-CBM). Both groups completed an Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT) before and after undergoing one i-CBM session (positive or negative).

Results

positive i-CBM reduced overgenerality of autobiographical memories, while negative i-CBM increased it.

Conclusions

These results suggest that changing one’s cognitive interpretation bias also changes one’s memory bias. Thus, the same task that reduces negative bias from autobiographical memories also reduces overgenerality of autobiographical memories. In addition, the results strengthen the suggestion that the use of imagery and the ability to generate specific autobiographical memories are related. These findings hold great potential for our understanding of the interconnection between the different cognitive memory biases that lay at the base of several psychopathologies.

Abstract Image

解释偏差修正影响自传体记忆
背景和目的人们发现,自传体记忆与个人当前的心理状态有关。自传体记忆在价值、内容和特异性方面的偏差被认为与一个人的幸福感和心理健康有关。以往的研究表明,通过使用旨在改变解释偏差的认知偏差修正技术,也可以改变记忆的价值偏差。本研究的目的是调查这些技术是否也能改变自传体记忆的过度泛化现象,这种现象与不同的精神病理学密切相关。我们假设,积极的解释会减少自传体记忆的过度泛化,而消极的解释偏差则会增加过度泛化。方法我们招募了 60 名参与者,将他们分为两组,即积极与消极意象认知偏差修正(i-CBM)组。结果积极的 i-CBM 会减少自传体记忆的过度概括性,而消极的 i-CBM 则会增加过度概括性。因此,减少自传体记忆负面偏差的同一任务也会减少自传体记忆的过度泛化。此外,研究结果还加强了一种观点,即意象的使用和产生特定自传记忆的能力是相关的。这些发现对于我们理解不同认知记忆偏差之间的相互联系具有巨大的潜力,而这些偏差正是多种精神病理学的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信