What are the neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth? A systematic literature review

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY
Angeliki Smyrli, Vishnuga Raveendran, Simone Walter, Waheeda Pagarkar, Nigel Field, Seilesh Kadambari, Hermione Lyall, Heather Bailey
{"title":"What are the neurodevelopmental outcomes of children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection at birth? A systematic literature review","authors":"Angeliki Smyrli, Vishnuga Raveendran, Simone Walter, Waheeda Pagarkar, Nigel Field, Seilesh Kadambari, Hermione Lyall, Heather Bailey","doi":"10.1002/rmv.2555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is among the most common congenital infections globally. Of 85%–90% cCMV‐infected infants without symptoms at birth, 10%–15% develop sequelae, most commonly sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL); their childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes are less well understood. Embase and MEDLINE were searched for publications from 16<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> September 2016 to 9th February 2024 to identify studies reporting primary data on neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with asymptomatic cCMV (AcCMV), measured using assessment tools or as evaluated by the study investigators, clinicians, educators, or parents. The Newcastle‐Ottawa scale was applied to studies to assess risk of bias. Of 28 studies from 18 mostly high‐income countries, there were 5‐109 children with AcCMV per study and 6/28 had a mean or median age at last follow‐up of ≥5 years. Children with AcCMV had better neurodevelopmental outcomes than children with symptomatic cCMV in 16/19 studies. Of 9/28 studies comparing AcCMV with CMV‐uninfected children, six reported similar outcomes whilst three reported differences limited to measures of full‐scale intelligence and receptive vocabulary among children with AcCMV and SNHL, or more generally in motor impairment. Common limitations of studies for our question were a lack of cCMV‐uninfected controls, heterogeneous definitions of AcCMV, lack of focus on neurodevelopment, selection bias and inadequate follow‐up. There was little evidence of children with AcCMV having worse neurodevelopmental outcomes than CMV‐uninfected children, but this conclusion is limited by study characteristics and quality; findings highlight the need for well‐designed and standardised approaches to investigate long‐term sequelae.","PeriodicalId":21180,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Virology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is among the most common congenital infections globally. Of 85%–90% cCMV‐infected infants without symptoms at birth, 10%–15% develop sequelae, most commonly sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL); their childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes are less well understood. Embase and MEDLINE were searched for publications from 16th September 2016 to 9th February 2024 to identify studies reporting primary data on neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with asymptomatic cCMV (AcCMV), measured using assessment tools or as evaluated by the study investigators, clinicians, educators, or parents. The Newcastle‐Ottawa scale was applied to studies to assess risk of bias. Of 28 studies from 18 mostly high‐income countries, there were 5‐109 children with AcCMV per study and 6/28 had a mean or median age at last follow‐up of ≥5 years. Children with AcCMV had better neurodevelopmental outcomes than children with symptomatic cCMV in 16/19 studies. Of 9/28 studies comparing AcCMV with CMV‐uninfected children, six reported similar outcomes whilst three reported differences limited to measures of full‐scale intelligence and receptive vocabulary among children with AcCMV and SNHL, or more generally in motor impairment. Common limitations of studies for our question were a lack of cCMV‐uninfected controls, heterogeneous definitions of AcCMV, lack of focus on neurodevelopment, selection bias and inadequate follow‐up. There was little evidence of children with AcCMV having worse neurodevelopmental outcomes than CMV‐uninfected children, but this conclusion is limited by study characteristics and quality; findings highlight the need for well‐designed and standardised approaches to investigate long‐term sequelae.
无症状先天性巨细胞病毒感染患儿的神经发育结局如何?系统性文献综述
先天性巨细胞病毒(cCMV)是全球最常见的先天性感染之一。85%-90%的巨细胞病毒感染婴儿在出生时无症状,其中10%-15%的婴儿会出现后遗症,最常见的是感音神经性听力损失(SNHL);而他们的儿童神经发育结果则不太清楚。研究人员检索了 Embase 和 MEDLINE 中从 2016 年 9 月 16 日至 2024 年 2 月 9 日的出版物,以确定报告无症状 cCMV(AcCMV)患儿神经发育结局的主要数据的研究,这些数据使用评估工具进行测量,或由研究调查人员、临床医生、教育工作者或家长进行评估。研究采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。在来自 18 个主要是高收入国家的 28 项研究中,每项研究有 5-109 名儿童患有 AcCMV,其中 6/28 项研究最后一次随访的平均年龄或中位年龄≥5 岁。在 16/19 项研究中,AcCMV 患儿的神经发育结果优于无症状 cCMV 患儿。在 9/28 项将 AcCMV 儿童与未感染 CMV 儿童进行比较的研究中,6 项报告了相似的结果,而 3 项报告的差异仅限于 AcCMV 儿童与 SNHL 儿童在全面智力和接受性词汇量方面的测量,或更普遍的运动障碍方面。就我们的问题而言,这些研究的共同局限是缺乏未感染 cCMV 的对照组、AcCMV 的定义不一致、缺乏对神经发育的关注、选择偏差和随访不足。几乎没有证据表明,与未感染 CMV 的儿童相比,AcCMV 患儿的神经发育结果更差,但这一结论受到研究特点和质量的限制;研究结果突出表明,有必要采用精心设计的标准化方法来调查长期后遗症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Virology
Reviews in Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Virology aims to provide articles reviewing conceptual or technological advances in diverse areas of virology. The journal covers topics such as molecular biology, cell biology, replication, pathogenesis, immunology, immunization, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment of viruses of medical importance, and COVID-19 research. The journal has an Impact Factor of 6.989 for the year 2020. The readership of the journal includes clinicians, virologists, medical microbiologists, molecular biologists, infectious disease specialists, and immunologists. Reviews in Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in databases such as CABI, Abstracts in Anthropology, ProQuest, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, ProQuest Central K-494, SCOPUS, and Web of Science et,al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信