Enzyme immuno assay of the estrogen receptor in breast cancer biopsy samples. A comparison with isoelectric focusing.

M Fernö, A Borg, G Sellberg
{"title":"Enzyme immuno assay of the estrogen receptor in breast cancer biopsy samples. A comparison with isoelectric focusing.","authors":"M Fernö,&nbsp;A Borg,&nbsp;G Sellberg","doi":"10.3109/02841868609136398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The estrogen receptor (ER) was measured by isoelectric focusing (IF) and enzyme immuno assay (EIA) in 127 breast cancer samples. When comparing the two techniques quantitatively, a very high correlation coefficient was obtained (rs = 0.98; p less than 0.001). ER recovery increased, however, by a mean factor of 2.5 when EIA was used instead of IF. This increase seemed to be influenced by the ER concentration level, being lower at higher levels. The difference between IF and EIA did not seem to be due to menopausal status. A possible field of application for EIA might be measurement of ER in samples from patients on tamoxifen therapy. In five out of nine such samples, a considerably higher measurable amount of ER was found with EIA than with IF. EIA was also found to be a simpler and less time-consuming method than IF. These advantages should, however, be weighed against the present higher costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":77655,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica. Oncology","volume":"25 3","pages":"171-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/02841868609136398","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica. Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/02841868609136398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

The estrogen receptor (ER) was measured by isoelectric focusing (IF) and enzyme immuno assay (EIA) in 127 breast cancer samples. When comparing the two techniques quantitatively, a very high correlation coefficient was obtained (rs = 0.98; p less than 0.001). ER recovery increased, however, by a mean factor of 2.5 when EIA was used instead of IF. This increase seemed to be influenced by the ER concentration level, being lower at higher levels. The difference between IF and EIA did not seem to be due to menopausal status. A possible field of application for EIA might be measurement of ER in samples from patients on tamoxifen therapy. In five out of nine such samples, a considerably higher measurable amount of ER was found with EIA than with IF. EIA was also found to be a simpler and less time-consuming method than IF. These advantages should, however, be weighed against the present higher costs.

乳腺癌活检标本中雌激素受体的酶免疫测定。与等电聚焦的比较。
采用等电聚焦法(IF)和酶免疫法(EIA)检测127例乳腺癌患者的雌激素受体(ER)水平。在定量比较两种技术时,获得了非常高的相关系数(rs = 0.98;P < 0.001)。然而,当使用EIA代替IF时,ER回收率平均提高了2.5倍。这种增加似乎受到内质网浓度水平的影响,浓度越高越低。IF和EIA之间的差异似乎与绝经状态无关。EIA的一个可能应用领域可能是测量他莫昔芬治疗患者样本中的ER。在9个这样的样本中,有5个样本中,EIA发现的ER的可测量量明显高于IF。环评也被认为是一种比IF更简单、更省时的方法。然而,这些好处应该与目前较高的成本加以权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信