Online awareness is associated with superior performance on assessments of functional cognition

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Timothy S. Marks, Gordon Muir Giles, Dorothy Farrar Edwards
{"title":"Online awareness is associated with superior performance on assessments of functional cognition","authors":"Timothy S. Marks, Gordon Muir Giles, Dorothy Farrar Edwards","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2024.1384812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundIntact awareness facilitates an individual’s adoption of strategies to support community living skills. However, most studies have not examined awareness during ongoing complex task performance. Objective: To examine whether community-dwelling adult’s Accuracy and Strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity 17-item version (WCPA-17), Total Cues on the Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills Checkbook Balancing and Shopping Task (PCST), and scores on the self-report Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study – Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL) differ between groups who do and do not demonstrate awareness of performance difficulties on the WCPA-17.MethodsUsing data collected as part of a larger study we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 274 community-dwelling adults aged 55 to 93 years. Two methods classified participants into groups aware or unaware of their performance. Independent sample <jats:italic>t</jats:italic>-tests examined group differences on four dependent variables: Accuracy and Strategy use on the WCPA-17, PCST Total Cues, and score on the ADCS-ADL.ResultsUsing one classification method, aware individuals showed superior Accuracy (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001), used more Strategies (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.002), needed fewer PCST Total Cues (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001), and reported greater independence on the ADCS-ADL (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.004), similar trends were observed with the other method in Accuracy (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001) and PCST Total Cues (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001) but Strategy use and ADCS-ADL differences failed to reach significance after Bonferroni correction.ConclusionGroups categorized as aware performed better on all measures. Intact awareness is critical to performance on complex everyday activities and can be evaluated with functional cognition assessments.","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1384812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIntact awareness facilitates an individual’s adoption of strategies to support community living skills. However, most studies have not examined awareness during ongoing complex task performance. Objective: To examine whether community-dwelling adult’s Accuracy and Strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity 17-item version (WCPA-17), Total Cues on the Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills Checkbook Balancing and Shopping Task (PCST), and scores on the self-report Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study – Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL) differ between groups who do and do not demonstrate awareness of performance difficulties on the WCPA-17.MethodsUsing data collected as part of a larger study we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 274 community-dwelling adults aged 55 to 93 years. Two methods classified participants into groups aware or unaware of their performance. Independent sample t-tests examined group differences on four dependent variables: Accuracy and Strategy use on the WCPA-17, PCST Total Cues, and score on the ADCS-ADL.ResultsUsing one classification method, aware individuals showed superior Accuracy (p &lt; 0.001), used more Strategies (p = 0.002), needed fewer PCST Total Cues (p &lt; 0.001), and reported greater independence on the ADCS-ADL (p &lt; 0.004), similar trends were observed with the other method in Accuracy (p &lt; 0.001) and PCST Total Cues (p &lt; 0.001) but Strategy use and ADCS-ADL differences failed to reach significance after Bonferroni correction.ConclusionGroups categorized as aware performed better on all measures. Intact awareness is critical to performance on complex everyday activities and can be evaluated with functional cognition assessments.
在线认知与功能认知评估中的优异表现有关
背景综合意识有助于个人采取支持社区生活技能的策略。然而,大多数研究都没有考察在执行复杂任务时的意识。研究目的研究社区居住的成年人在每周日历计划活动 17 个项目版(WCPA-17)中的准确性和策略使用、自理能力表现评估支票簿平衡和购物任务(PCST)中的总提示,以及自我报告的阿尔茨海默病合作研究--日常生活活动量表(ADCS-ADL)中的得分,在WCPA-17中表现出和未表现出意识到表现困难的群体之间是否存在差异。方法利用作为一项大型研究的一部分而收集的数据,我们对 274 名年龄在 55 岁至 93 岁之间、居住在社区的成年人进行了横断面分析。我们采用两种方法将参与者分为意识到或未意识到其表现的两组。独立样本 t 检验检查了四个因变量的组间差异:结果使用一种分类方法,意识到的个体显示出更高的准确性(p &;lt;0.001),使用了更多的策略(p = 0.002),需要更少的 PCST 总提示(p &;lt;0.001),并且在 ADCS-ADL 上报告了更大的独立性(p &;lt; 0.004),其他方法在准确性(p &;lt;0.001)和 PCST 总线索(p &;lt;0.001)方面观察到类似趋势,但策略使用和 ADCS-ADL 差异在 Bonferroni 校正后未达到显著性。完整的意识对于完成复杂的日常活动至关重要,可以通过功能认知评估进行评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信