Towards optimized methodological parameters for maximizing the behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Tyler Santander, Sara Leslie, Luna J. Li, Henri E. Skinner, Jessica M. Simonson, Patrick Sweeney, Kaitlyn P. Deen, Michael B. Miller, Tad T. Brunye
{"title":"Towards optimized methodological parameters for maximizing the behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation","authors":"Tyler Santander, Sara Leslie, Luna J. Li, Henri E. Skinner, Jessica M. Simonson, Patrick Sweeney, Kaitlyn P. Deen, Michael B. Miller, Tad T. Brunye","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1305446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) administers low-intensity direct current electrical stimulation to brain regions via electrodes arranged on the surface of the scalp. The core promise of tDCS is its ability to modulate brain activity and affect performance on diverse cognitive functions (affording <jats:italic>causal</jats:italic> inferences regarding regional brain activity and behavior), but the optimal methodological parameters for maximizing behavioral effects remain to be elucidated. Here we sought to examine the effects of 10 stimulation and experimental design factors across a series of five cognitive domains: motor performance, visual search, working memory, vigilance, and response inhibition. The objective was to identify a set of optimal parameter settings that consistently and reliably maximized the behavioral effects of tDCS within each cognitive domain.MethodsWe surveyed tDCS effects on these various cognitive functions in healthy young adults, ultimately resulting in 721 effects across 106 published reports. Hierarchical Bayesian meta-regression models were fit to characterize how (and to what extent) these design parameters differentially predict the likelihood of positive/negative behavioral outcomes.ResultsConsistent with many previous meta-analyses of tDCS effects, extensive variability was observed across tasks and measured outcomes. Consequently, most design parameters did not confer consistent advantages or disadvantages to behavioral effects—a domain-general model suggested an advantage to using within-subjects designs (versus between-subjects) and the tendency for cathodal stimulation (relative to anodal stimulation) to produce reduced behavioral effects, but these associations were scarcely-evident in domain-specific models.DiscussionThese findings highlight the urgent need for tDCS studies to more systematically probe the effects of these parameters on behavior to fulfill the promise of identifying causal links between brain function and cognition.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1305446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) administers low-intensity direct current electrical stimulation to brain regions via electrodes arranged on the surface of the scalp. The core promise of tDCS is its ability to modulate brain activity and affect performance on diverse cognitive functions (affording causal inferences regarding regional brain activity and behavior), but the optimal methodological parameters for maximizing behavioral effects remain to be elucidated. Here we sought to examine the effects of 10 stimulation and experimental design factors across a series of five cognitive domains: motor performance, visual search, working memory, vigilance, and response inhibition. The objective was to identify a set of optimal parameter settings that consistently and reliably maximized the behavioral effects of tDCS within each cognitive domain.MethodsWe surveyed tDCS effects on these various cognitive functions in healthy young adults, ultimately resulting in 721 effects across 106 published reports. Hierarchical Bayesian meta-regression models were fit to characterize how (and to what extent) these design parameters differentially predict the likelihood of positive/negative behavioral outcomes.ResultsConsistent with many previous meta-analyses of tDCS effects, extensive variability was observed across tasks and measured outcomes. Consequently, most design parameters did not confer consistent advantages or disadvantages to behavioral effects—a domain-general model suggested an advantage to using within-subjects designs (versus between-subjects) and the tendency for cathodal stimulation (relative to anodal stimulation) to produce reduced behavioral effects, but these associations were scarcely-evident in domain-specific models.DiscussionThese findings highlight the urgent need for tDCS studies to more systematically probe the effects of these parameters on behavior to fulfill the promise of identifying causal links between brain function and cognition.
优化方法参数,最大限度地发挥经颅直流电刺激的行为效应
引言 经颅直流电刺激(transcranial direct current stimulation,tDCS)是通过布置在头皮表面的电极对大脑区域进行低强度直流电刺激。tDCS 的核心功能是调节大脑活动并影响不同认知功能的表现(提供有关区域大脑活动和行为的因果推论),但最大化行为效果的最佳方法参数仍有待阐明。在这里,我们试图研究 10 种刺激和实验设计因素对以下五个认知领域的影响:运动表现、视觉搜索、工作记忆、警觉性和反应抑制。我们调查了 tDCS 对健康年轻人各种认知功能的影响,最终在 106 篇已发表的报告中发现了 721 种影响。我们拟合了层次贝叶斯元回归模型,以描述这些设计参数如何(以及在多大程度上)以不同方式预测积极/消极行为结果的可能性。结果与之前许多关于 tDCS 效果的元分析一致,在不同任务和测量结果之间观察到了广泛的变异性。因此,大多数设计参数并没有给行为效应带来一致的优势或劣势--领域一般模型表明,使用受试者内设计(相对于受试者间设计)具有优势,阴极刺激(相对于阳极刺激)倾向于产生较低的行为效应,但这些关联在特定领域模型中几乎不明显.讨论这些发现突出表明,tDCS研究迫切需要更系统地探究这些参数对行为的影响,以实现确定大脑功能与认知之间因果联系的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信