{"title":"Comparative analysis of plasma affinity depletion methods: Impact on protein composition and phosphopeptide abundance in human plasma","authors":"Pallaprolu Nikhil, Dande Aishwarya, Sameer Dhingra, Krishna Pandey, V. Ravichandiran, Ramalingam Peraman","doi":"10.1002/elps.202400030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Affinity-based protein depletion and TiO<sub>2</sub> enrichment methods play a crucial role in detection of low-abundant proteins and phosphopeptides enrichment, respectively. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HSA/IgG (HU2) and Human 7 (HU7) depletion methods and their impact on phosphopeptides coverage through comparative proteome analysis, utilizing in-solution digestion and nano-LC-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (MS). Our results demonstrated that both HU2 and HU7 affinity depletion significantly decreased high-abundant proteins by 1.5–7.8-fold (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A total of 1491 proteins were identified, with 48 proteins showing significant expression in the depleted groups. Notably, cadherin-13, neutrophil defensin 1, APM1, and desmoplakin variant protein were exclusively detected in the HU2/HU7-depleted groups. Furthermore, study on effect of depletion on phosphopeptides revealed an increase in tandem MS spectral counts with notable decrease (∼50%) in peptide spectrum matching in depleted groups, which was attributed to significant reduction in protein counts. Our post translation modification workflow for phosphoproteomics detected 42 phosphorylated peptides, corresponding to 12 phosphoproteins with unique peptide match ≥2 (high false discovery rates confidence). Among them, 10 phosphorylated proteins are highly expressed in depleted groups. Overall, these findings offer valuable insights in selection of protein depletion methods for comprehensive plasma proteomics analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11596,"journal":{"name":"ELECTROPHORESIS","volume":"45 19-20","pages":"1860-1873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ELECTROPHORESIS","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.202400030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Affinity-based protein depletion and TiO2 enrichment methods play a crucial role in detection of low-abundant proteins and phosphopeptides enrichment, respectively. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of HSA/IgG (HU2) and Human 7 (HU7) depletion methods and their impact on phosphopeptides coverage through comparative proteome analysis, utilizing in-solution digestion and nano-LC-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (MS). Our results demonstrated that both HU2 and HU7 affinity depletion significantly decreased high-abundant proteins by 1.5–7.8-fold (p < 0.001). A total of 1491 proteins were identified, with 48 proteins showing significant expression in the depleted groups. Notably, cadherin-13, neutrophil defensin 1, APM1, and desmoplakin variant protein were exclusively detected in the HU2/HU7-depleted groups. Furthermore, study on effect of depletion on phosphopeptides revealed an increase in tandem MS spectral counts with notable decrease (∼50%) in peptide spectrum matching in depleted groups, which was attributed to significant reduction in protein counts. Our post translation modification workflow for phosphoproteomics detected 42 phosphorylated peptides, corresponding to 12 phosphoproteins with unique peptide match ≥2 (high false discovery rates confidence). Among them, 10 phosphorylated proteins are highly expressed in depleted groups. Overall, these findings offer valuable insights in selection of protein depletion methods for comprehensive plasma proteomics analysis.
期刊介绍:
ELECTROPHORESIS is an international journal that publishes original manuscripts on all aspects of electrophoresis, and liquid phase separations (e.g., HPLC, micro- and nano-LC, UHPLC, micro- and nano-fluidics, liquid-phase micro-extractions, etc.).
Topics include new or improved analytical and preparative methods, sample preparation, development of theory, and innovative applications of electrophoretic and liquid phase separations methods in the study of nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates natural products, pharmaceuticals, food analysis, environmental species and other compounds of importance to the life sciences.
Papers in the areas of microfluidics and proteomics, which are not limited to electrophoresis-based methods, will also be accepted for publication. Contributions focused on hyphenated and omics techniques are also of interest. Proteomics is within the scope, if related to its fundamentals and new technical approaches. Proteomics applications are only considered in particular cases.
Papers describing the application of standard electrophoretic methods will not be considered.
Papers on nanoanalysis intended for publication in ELECTROPHORESIS should focus on one or more of the following topics:
• Nanoscale electrokinetics and phenomena related to electric double layer and/or confinement in nano-sized geometry
• Single cell and subcellular analysis
• Nanosensors and ultrasensitive detection aspects (e.g., involving quantum dots, "nanoelectrodes" or nanospray MS)
• Nanoscale/nanopore DNA sequencing (next generation sequencing)
• Micro- and nanoscale sample preparation
• Nanoparticles and cells analyses by dielectrophoresis
• Separation-based analysis using nanoparticles, nanotubes and nanowires.