Marta Dias, Pedro Pena, Bianca Gomes, Renata Cervante, Sara Gonçalves, Susana Viegas, Carla Viegas
{"title":"129 Sampling protocol to assess occupational exposure to microbial contamination in wood working environments","authors":"Marta Dias, Pedro Pena, Bianca Gomes, Renata Cervante, Sara Gonçalves, Susana Viegas, Carla Viegas","doi":"10.1093/annweh/wxae035.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sawmill market is driven by rising construction demand, with building and furniture gaining prominence. Workers in the sawmill industry may be exposed to wood derivatives, microorganisms, and their products, which can cause health effects such as decreased lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and various respiratory disorders. Exposure to wood dust infected with microorganisms, particularly fungi, can lead to allergic alveolitis and asthma in woodworkers. It is well known that there is a knowledge gap in the field of microbial occupational exposure assessment in sawmills, nevertheless, the importance of an accurate assessment and risk management should be emphasized. The sampling approach applied in this study comprehends several sampling methods that are used as a complement to overcome the advantages and disadvantages of each. Those methods are active sampling methods, such as Andersen six-stage, MAS-100 and Button Samplers, and passive sampling methods namely surface swabs, electrostatic dust cloths (EDC), EDC in t-shirts, settled dust, gloves and masks and filters from the vacuumed settled dust. This sampling approach was developed to be applied in wood working environment and it was meticulously developed using previously conducted bibliographic research and applied in sampling campaigns developed in “Do It Yourself” (DIY) stores with a wood cutting section, and in sawmills. With the application of this comprehensive protocol, it was possible to conclude that the use of all these sampling methods in parallel is crucial to overcome the constraints of each to allow a proper characterization of the risks to which these workers are exposed. Similar considerations should be taken to select the best lab approach.","PeriodicalId":8362,"journal":{"name":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals Of Work Exposures and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxae035.061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The sawmill market is driven by rising construction demand, with building and furniture gaining prominence. Workers in the sawmill industry may be exposed to wood derivatives, microorganisms, and their products, which can cause health effects such as decreased lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and various respiratory disorders. Exposure to wood dust infected with microorganisms, particularly fungi, can lead to allergic alveolitis and asthma in woodworkers. It is well known that there is a knowledge gap in the field of microbial occupational exposure assessment in sawmills, nevertheless, the importance of an accurate assessment and risk management should be emphasized. The sampling approach applied in this study comprehends several sampling methods that are used as a complement to overcome the advantages and disadvantages of each. Those methods are active sampling methods, such as Andersen six-stage, MAS-100 and Button Samplers, and passive sampling methods namely surface swabs, electrostatic dust cloths (EDC), EDC in t-shirts, settled dust, gloves and masks and filters from the vacuumed settled dust. This sampling approach was developed to be applied in wood working environment and it was meticulously developed using previously conducted bibliographic research and applied in sampling campaigns developed in “Do It Yourself” (DIY) stores with a wood cutting section, and in sawmills. With the application of this comprehensive protocol, it was possible to conclude that the use of all these sampling methods in parallel is crucial to overcome the constraints of each to allow a proper characterization of the risks to which these workers are exposed. Similar considerations should be taken to select the best lab approach.
期刊介绍:
About the Journal
Annals of Work Exposures and Health is dedicated to presenting advances in exposure science supporting the recognition, quantification, and control of exposures at work, and epidemiological studies on their effects on human health and well-being. A key question we apply to submission is, "Is this paper going to help readers better understand, quantify, and control conditions at work that adversely or positively affect health and well-being?"
We are interested in high quality scientific research addressing:
the quantification of work exposures, including chemical, biological, physical, biomechanical, and psychosocial, and the elements of work organization giving rise to such exposures;
the relationship between these exposures and the acute and chronic health consequences for those exposed and their families and communities;
populations at special risk of work-related exposures including women, under-represented minorities, immigrants, and other vulnerable groups such as temporary, contingent and informal sector workers;
the effectiveness of interventions addressing exposure and risk including production technologies, work process engineering, and personal protective systems;
policies and management approaches to reduce risk and improve health and well-being among workers, their families or communities;
methodologies and mechanisms that underlie the quantification and/or control of exposure and risk.
There is heavy pressure on space in the journal, and the above interests mean that we do not usually publish papers that simply report local conditions without generalizable results. We are also unlikely to publish reports on human health and well-being without information on the work exposure characteristics giving rise to the effects. We particularly welcome contributions from scientists based in, or addressing conditions in, developing economies that fall within the above scope.