Do forest conservation policies undermine the soybean sector in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from the priority listing of municipalities

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Léa Crepin
{"title":"Do forest conservation policies undermine the soybean sector in the Brazilian Amazon? Evidence from the priority listing of municipalities","authors":"Léa Crepin","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Minimizing the trade-offs between agricultural production, development and forest conservation is key to ensure that conservation policies can achieve long-term positive impacts. Taking the case of the Brazilian Amazon in the context of the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon, I estimate the impact of the prioritizing of municipalities with high deforestation risk from soybean production (a major driver of deforestation), exports and land-use changes relying on a difference-in-differences and generalized synthetic control approach. I find that, although effective in reducing deforestation, the policy is unlikely to have undermined the soybean production and exports. On the contrary, the results suggest that the soybean sector benefited from the changes in land use following the implementation of the priority list. However, I do not find evidence that land restriction triggered the intensification of soybean production, which suggests that the soybean sector benefited from intra-crops reallocation and pasture conversion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924001095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimizing the trade-offs between agricultural production, development and forest conservation is key to ensure that conservation policies can achieve long-term positive impacts. Taking the case of the Brazilian Amazon in the context of the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon, I estimate the impact of the prioritizing of municipalities with high deforestation risk from soybean production (a major driver of deforestation), exports and land-use changes relying on a difference-in-differences and generalized synthetic control approach. I find that, although effective in reducing deforestation, the policy is unlikely to have undermined the soybean production and exports. On the contrary, the results suggest that the soybean sector benefited from the changes in land use following the implementation of the priority list. However, I do not find evidence that land restriction triggered the intensification of soybean production, which suggests that the soybean sector benefited from intra-crops reallocation and pasture conversion.

森林保护政策会损害巴西亚马逊地区的大豆产业吗?来自市镇优先名单的证据
尽量减少农业生产、发展和森林保护之间的权衡,是确保保护政策能够产生长期积极影响的关键。以巴西亚马逊地区的《预防和控制法定亚马逊地区毁林行动计划》为例,我采用差分法和广义合成控制法估算了优先考虑大豆生产(毁林的主要驱动因素)、出口和土地使用变化等毁林风险高的城市所产生的影响。我发现,尽管该政策有效地减少了森林砍伐,但不太可能破坏大豆生产和出口。相反,研究结果表明,在优先列表实施后,大豆产业从土地利用的变化中获益。然而,我没有发现土地限制引发大豆生产集约化的证据,这表明大豆部门受益于作物内部重新分配和牧场转换。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信